Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
23 Jun 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
23 Jun 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Willem Hanekom |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
23 Jun 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
25 Jul 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hans-Joachim Mollenkopf |
15 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Martin Vordermeier |
18 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Willem Hanekom |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
18 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
26 Jan 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Martin Vordermeier |
29 Jan 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hans-Joachim Mollenkopf |
11 Feb 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Willem Hanekom |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
11 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
13 Feb 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Willem Hanekom |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
13 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
24 Feb 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
24 Feb 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1755-8794-2-10 |
You can find further information about peer review here.