High-resolution analysis of copy number alterations and associated expression changes in ovarian tumors
© Haverty et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 23 October 2008
Accepted: 06 May 2009
Published: 06 May 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|23 Oct 2008||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Dec 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Philippe Broet|
|16 Dec 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Giovanni Tonon|
|22 Dec 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bauke Ylstra|
|11 Feb 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Peter Haverty|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|11 Feb 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|23 Feb 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bauke Ylstra|
|3 Mar 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Philippe Broet|
|10 Mar 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Giovanni Tonon|
|28 Apr 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Peter Haverty|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|28 Apr 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|6 May 2009||Editorially accepted|
|6 May 2009||Article published||10.1186/1755-8794-2-21|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.