Human difference in the genomic era: Facilitating a socially responsible dialogue
- Sarah Knerr†1, 3,
- Edward Ramos†1, 2Email author,
- Juleigh Nowinski1, 4,
- Keianna Dixon1, 5 and
- Vence L Bonham1
© Knerr et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 17 January 2010
Accepted: 26 May 2010
Published: 26 May 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|17 Jan 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|25 Jan 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Edward Ramos|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|25 Jan 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 Feb 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Timothy Caulfield|
|5 Mar 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stephen Scherer|
|19 Apr 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Edward Ramos|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|19 Apr 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 May 2010||Editorially accepted|
|26 May 2010||Article published||10.1186/1755-8794-3-20|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.