Enrichment of ultraconserved elements among genomic imbalances causing mental delay and congenital anomalies
© Martínez et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 13 December 2009
Accepted: 23 November 2010
Published: 23 November 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|13 Dec 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Feb 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Guy Froyen|
|21 Jun 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Xinghua Mindy Shi|
|14 Aug 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Francisco Martinez|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|14 Aug 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Aug 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Guy Froyen|
|3 Sep 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Xinghua Mindy Shi|
|21 Oct 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Francisco Martinez|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|21 Oct 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|23 Nov 2010||Editorially accepted|
|23 Nov 2010||Article published||10.1186/1755-8794-3-54|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.