mspecLINE: bridging knowledge of human disease with the proteome
© Handcock et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 23 October 2009
Accepted: 10 March 2010
Published: 10 March 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|23 Oct 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 Oct 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Jeremy Handcock|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|26 Oct 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Dec 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ugis Sarkans|
|19 Dec 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Xiang Zhang|
|22 Dec 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Springer|
|28 Jan 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Jeremy Handcock|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|28 Jan 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Feb 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Xiang Zhang|
|8 Mar 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Jeremy Handcock|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|8 Mar 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|10 Mar 2010||Editorially accepted|
|10 Mar 2010||Article published||10.1186/1755-8794-3-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.