Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Molecular sampling of prostate cancer: a dilemma for predicting disease progression

  • Andrea Sboner1,
  • Francesca Demichelis2, 3,
  • Stefano Calza4, 5,
  • Yudi Pawitan4,
  • Sunita R Setlur6,
  • Yujin Hoshida7, 8,
  • Sven Perner2,
  • Hans-Olov Adami4, 9,
  • Katja Fall4, 9,
  • Lorelei A Mucci9, 11, 12,
  • Philip W Kantoff8, 11,
  • Meir Stampfer9, 11, 12,
  • Swen-Olof Andersson10,
  • Eberhard Varenhorst13,
  • Jan-Erik Johansson10,
  • Mark B Gerstein1, 14, 15,
  • Todd R Golub7, 8, 16,
  • Mark A Rubin2, 7Email author and
  • Ove Andrén10
Contributed equally
BMC Medical Genomics20103:8

DOI: 10.1186/1755-8794-3-8

Received: 5 November 2009

Accepted: 16 March 2010

Published: 16 March 2010

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
5 Nov 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ken Hess
17 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - George Vasmatzis
24 Jan 2010 Author responded Author comments - Mark Rubin
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Jan 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
29 Jan 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ken Hess
21 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - George Vasmatzis
1 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Mark Rubin
Resubmission - Version 4
1 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
5 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Mark Rubin
Resubmission - Version 5
5 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
10 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Mark Rubin
Resubmission - Version 7
10 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
16 Mar 2010 Editorially accepted
16 Mar 2010 Article published 10.1186/1755-8794-3-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University
(2)
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical Center
(3)
Weill Cornell Medical Center, Institute for Computational Biomedicine
(4)
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet
(5)
Department of Biomedical Sciences and Biotechnologies, University of Brescia
(6)
Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital
(7)
The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
(8)
The Dana Farber Cancer Institute
(9)
Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health
(10)
Department of Urology, Örebro University Hospital
(11)
Harvard Medical School
(12)
Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital
(13)
Department of Urology, Linköping University Hospital
(14)
Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University
(15)
Department of Computer Science, Yale University
(16)
The Howard Hughes Medical Institute at The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard

Advertisement