Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Skeletal muscle alterations and exercise performance decrease in erythropoietin-deficient mice: a comparative study

  • Laurence Mille-Hamard1Email author,
  • Veronique L Billat1,
  • Elodie Henry1,
  • Blandine Bonnamy1,
  • Florence Joly2,
  • Philippe Benech2 and
  • Eric Barrey1, 3
BMC Medical Genomics20125:29

DOI: 10.1186/1755-8794-5-29

Received: 13 December 2011

Accepted: 21 June 2012

Published: 29 June 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
13 Dec 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Regien Schoemaker
15 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report -
17 Apr 2012 Author responded Author comments - Laurence Mille-Hamard
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Apr 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report -
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
21 Jun 2012 Editorially accepted
29 Jun 2012 Article published 10.1186/1755-8794-5-29

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Unité de Biologie Intégrative des Adaptations à l’Exercice – INSERM 902, Genopole
UMR1313 Génétique Animale et Biologie Intégrative, INRA