Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The role of disease characteristics in the ethical debate on personal genome testing

  • Eline M Bunnik1Email author,
  • Maartje HN Schermer1 and
  • A Cecile JW Janssens2
BMC Medical Genomics20125:4

DOI: 10.1186/1755-8794-5-4

Received: 8 September 2011

Accepted: 19 January 2012

Published: 19 January 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Sep 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stuart Hogarth
13 Dec 2011 Author responded Author comments - Eline Maria Bunnik
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Dec 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stuart Hogarth
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
18 Jan 2012 Author responded Author comments - Eline Maria Bunnik
Resubmission - Version 5
18 Jan 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
19 Jan 2012 Editorially accepted
19 Jan 2012 Article published 10.1186/1755-8794-5-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Dept. of Medical Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center
(2)
Dept. of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center

Advertisement