The role of disease characteristics in the ethical debate on personal genome testing
© Bunnik et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 8 September 2011
Accepted: 19 January 2012
Published: 19 January 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|8 Sep 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stuart Hogarth|
|13 Dec 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Eline Maria Bunnik|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|13 Dec 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stuart Hogarth|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Eline Maria Bunnik|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|18 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|19 Jan 2012||Editorially accepted|
|19 Jan 2012||Article published||10.1186/1755-8794-5-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.