Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Approaches to informed consent for hypothesis-testing and hypothesis-generating clinical genomics research

  • Flavia M Facio1,
  • Julie C Sapp1,
  • Amy Linn1, 2 and
  • Leslie G Biesecker1Email author
BMC Medical Genomics20125:45

DOI: 10.1186/1755-8794-5-45

Received: 7 November 2011

Accepted: 5 October 2012

Published: 10 October 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
7 Nov 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne-Marie Tassé
10 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Leslie Biesecker
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Oct 2012 Editorially accepted
10 Oct 2012 Article published 10.1186/1755-8794-5-45

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health
Kennedy Krieger Institute