Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Identification and characterization of alternative exon usage linked glioblastoma multiforme survival

  • Ahmed Sadeque1,
  • Nicola VL Serão1,
  • Bruce R Southey1,
  • Kristin R Delfino1 and
  • Sandra L Rodriguez-Zas1, 2, 3Email author
BMC Medical Genomics20125:59

DOI: 10.1186/1755-8794-5-59

Received: 6 July 2012

Accepted: 27 November 2012

Published: 4 December 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
6 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Erica Bell
10 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marcus Breese
14 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Sandra Rodriguez-Zas
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Nov 2012 Editorially accepted
4 Dec 2012 Article published 10.1186/1755-8794-5-59

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Department of Statistics, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Institute of Genomic Biology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign