Quantitative analysis of cryptic splicing associated with TDP-43 depletion
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 18 November 2016
Accepted: 17 May 2017
Published: 26 May 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Nov 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Donald Rio|
|1 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Justin Wong|
|20 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yoseph Barash|
|27 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Jack Humphrey|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|27 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Justin Wong|
|15 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yoseph Barash|
|16 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Jack Humphrey|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 May 2017||Editorially accepted|
|26 May 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12920-017-0274-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.