Skip to main content

Table 2 CN Performance of different FFPE and fresh frozen sets

From: High quality copy number and genotype data from FFPE samples using Molecular Inversion Probe (MIP) microarrays

Institution (type) # with sufficient DNA # passed (% of all) # high quality (% of passed) median 2p-RSE of passed
CHTN (FFPE) 13 13 (100%) 11 (85%) 0.139
CHTN (FF) 12 12 (100%) 12 (100%) 0.102
CRUK (FFPE) 17 16 (94%) 12 (75%) 0.163
CRUK (FF) 17 17 (100%) 17 (100%) 0.142
Dana Farber (FFPE) 6 6 (100%) 1 (17%) 0.201
Leader (FFPE) 13 7 (54%) 4 (57%) 0.155
MD Anderson set1 (FFPE) 8 8 (100%) 7 (88%) 0.163
MD Anderson set2 (FFPE) 27 23 (85%) 18 (78%) 0.167
UCSF (FFPE) 9 9 (100%) 9 (100%) 0.115
UCSF (FF) 10 10 (100%) 10 (100%) 0.116
All FFPE 93 82 (88%) 62 (76%) 0.16
All FF* 39 39 (100%) 39 (100%) 0.129
  1. * Fresh frozen