Table 2 CN Performance of different FFPE and fresh frozen sets
Institution (type) | # with sufficient DNA | # passed (% of all) | # high quality (% of passed) | median 2p-RSE of passed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHTN (FFPE) | 13 | 13 (100%) | 11 (85%) | 0.139 |
CHTN (FF) | 12 | 12 (100%) | 12 (100%) | 0.102 |
CRUK (FFPE) | 17 | 16 (94%) | 12 (75%) | 0.163 |
CRUK (FF) | 17 | 17 (100%) | 17 (100%) | 0.142 |
Dana Farber (FFPE) | 6 | 6 (100%) | 1 (17%) | 0.201 |
Leader (FFPE) | 13 | 7 (54%) | 4 (57%) | 0.155 |
MD Anderson set1 (FFPE) | 8 | 8 (100%) | 7 (88%) | 0.163 |
MD Anderson set2 (FFPE) | 27 | 23 (85%) | 18 (78%) | 0.167 |
UCSF (FFPE) | 9 | 9 (100%) | 9 (100%) | 0.115 |
UCSF (FF) | 10 | 10 (100%) | 10 (100%) | 0.116 |
All FFPE | 93 | 82 (88%) | 62 (76%) | 0.16 |
All FF* | 39 | 39 (100%) | 39 (100%) | 0.129 |