Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: MUC1-associated proliferation signature predicts outcomes in lung adenocarcinoma patients

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Oct 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Akinori Hisatsune
2 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brian Ring
27 Jan 2010 Author responded Author comments - Dhara MacDermed
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Jan 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Akinori Hisatsune
10 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brian Ring
10 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Dhara MacDermed
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Dhara MacDermed
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
14 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Dhara MacDermed
Resubmission - Version 5
14 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
26 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Dhara MacDermed
Resubmission - Version 7
26 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
6 May 2010 Editorially accepted
6 May 2010 Article published 10.1186/1755-8794-3-16

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement