Skip to main content

Table 1 Phenotypic description of analyzed study groups

From: Mutation screen in the GWAS derived obesity gene SH2B1including functional analyses of detected variants

Samplea

status

n

% male [%]

age [mean ± SD]

BMI [mean ± SD]

BMI SDSb [mean ± SD]

Mutation Screen

Cases

95

48.42

13.43 ± 3.37

31.87 ± 5.04

4.10 ± 1.71

S I : family-based GWAS

Cases

705

45.11

13.44 ± 3.02

32.02 ± 5.82

4.23 ± 1.96

 

Parents

1,410

50.00

42.54 ± 6.02

30.28 ± 6.33

1.65 ± 1.84

S II : case–control GWAS

Cases

453

42.60

14.37 ± 3.75

33.15 ± 6.68

4.51 ± 2.15

 

Controls

435

39.08

26.08 ± 5.75

18.09 ± 1.14

−1.45 ± 0.34

S III : subset of case–control GWAS  (for association testing)

Cases

179

49.16

14.27 ± 2.39

35.56 ± 6.13

5.3 ± 2.09

Controls

185

55.68

25.56 ± 3.94

18.39 ± 1.09

−1.47 ± 0.33

S IV : obese adults

Cases

988

37.25

47.17 ± 14.23

35.70 ± 5.43

3.22 ± 1.66

S V : DAPOC

Cases

1,185

44.22

10.72 ± 2.78

27.69 ± 5.11

3.07 ± 1.56

S VI : KORA

Cases

6.633

56,43

56.62 ± 13.13

29.42 ± 3.70

1.19 ± 1.09

 

Controls

3.444

36,76

47.18 ± 13.37

22.72 ± 1.68

−0.53 ± 0.51

S VII : Ulm children’s study 1

Cases

97

57.73

7.57 ± 0.42

20.68 ± 1.71

1.06 ± 0.46

 

Controls

685

54.31

7.56 ± 0.42

15.63 ± 1.38

−0.25 ± 0.37

S VIII : BEPOC

Cases

1,046

47.99

10.89 ± 3.57

29.46 ± 5.91

3.54 ± 1.82

S IX : Ulm children’s study 2

Cases

271

51.29

11.07 ± 3.69

29.75 ± 6.04

3.62 ± 1.88

S X : Ulm children’s study 3

Cases

129

43.41

14.90 ± 1.84

40.45 ± 8.00

7.05 ± 2.92

  1. aMutation Screen sample: part of the family-based and the case–control GWAS samples’ cases; Family-based GWAS sample: 705 index patients with early-onset extreme obesity and their biological parent; case–control GWAS sample: GWAS of early-onset extremely obese children and adolescents in comparison to lean, adult controls; case–control sample for association testing: early-onset extremely obese children and adolescents in comparison to lean, adult controls; independent of initial screening sample; subset of cases-control GWAS sample; DAPOC: Datteln Paediatric Obese Cohort (27); KORA: Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg (30); Ulm children’s study 1: Ulm Research on Metabolism, Exercise and Lifestyle in Children (31); BEPOC: Berlin Paediatric Obese Cohort (28); Ulm children’s study 2 and 3: Ulm Paediatric Obese Cohort A and B (INSULA) (29).
  2. bCalculation of the BMI SDS values has been based on population reference values following the National Nutrition Survey I (25).