This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Continuing difficulties in interpreting CNV data: lessons from a genome-wide CNV association study of Australian HNPCC/lynch syndrome patients
© Talseth-Palmer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 27 August 2012
Accepted: 18 March 2013
Published: 26 March 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|27 Aug 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|19 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Xueling Sim|
|15 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jiannis Ragoussis|
|6 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Bente Talseth-Palmer|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Xueling Sim|
|6 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jiannis Ragoussis|
|15 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Bente Talseth-Palmer|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|15 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Bente Talseth-Palmer|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|17 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|18 Mar 2013||Editorially accepted|
|26 Mar 2013||Article published||10.1186/1755-8794-6-10|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.