Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Association of SNPs in LCP1 and CTIF with hearing in 11 year old children: Findings from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) birth cohort and the G-EAR consortium

BMC Medical Genomics volume 8, Article number: 48 (2015) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The genetic basis of hearing loss in humans is relatively poorly understood. In recent years, experimental approaches including laboratory studies of early onset hearing loss in inbred mouse strains, or proteomic analyses of hair cells or hair bundles, have suggested new candidate molecules involved in hearing function. However, the relevance of these genes/gene products to hearing function in humans remains unknown. We investigated whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the human orthologues of genes of interest arising from the above-mentioned studies correlate with hearing function in children.

Methods

577 SNPs from 13 genes were each analysed by linear regression against averaged high (3, 4 and 8 kHz) or low frequency (0.5, 1 and 2 kHz) audiometry data from 4970 children in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) birth-cohort at age eleven years. Genes found to contain SNPs with low p-values were then investigated in 3417 adults in the G-EAR study of hearing.

Results

Genotypic data were available in ALSPAC for a total of 577 SNPs from 13 genes of interest. Two SNPs approached sample-wide significance (pre-specified at p = 0.00014): rs12959910 in CBP80/20-dependent translation initiation factor (CTIF) for averaged high frequency hearing (p = 0.00079, β = 0.61 dB per minor allele); and rs10492452 in L-plastin (LCP1) for averaged low frequency hearing (p = 0.00056, β = 0.45 dB). For low frequencies, rs9567638 in LCP1 also enhanced hearing in females (p = 0.0011, β = −1.76 dB; males p = 0.23, β = 0.61 dB, likelihood-ratio test p = 0.006). SNPs in LCP1 and CTIF were then examined against low and high frequency hearing data for adults in G-EAR. Although the ALSPAC results were not replicated, a SNP in LCP1, rs17601960, is in strong LD with rs9967638, and was associated with enhanced low frequency hearing in adult females in G-EAR (p = 0.00084).

Conclusions

There was evidence to suggest that multiple SNPs in CTIF may contribute a small detrimental effect to hearing, and that a sex-specific locus in LCP1 is protective of hearing. No individual SNPs reached sample-wide significance in both ALSPAC and G-EAR. This is the first report of a possible association between LCP1 and hearing function.

Peer Review reports

Background

Hearing impairment has a major impact on quality of life. The difficulties associated with progressive hearing loss are particularly apparent with regard to the growing population of older individuals [1, 2]. Nevertheless, even minimal hearing loss in school-age children, which can be detected in around 1 % of children [3], may affect performance at school [4]. It is recognised that progressive hearing loss relates to both genetic and environmental factors, and to the interaction between these factors [5, 6]. Greater knowledge of the genetic factors that contribute to hearing loss could assist early identification of susceptible individuals in the general population.

Over the last 10–15 years, major advances have been made in understanding the molecular basis of mechanotransduction of sound waves in the mammalian inner ear, largely from the study of inherited forms of deafness [7, 8]. In the inner ear, the auditory epithelium contains specialised hair cells with an elaborate morphology in which the apical surfaces are decorated with stereociliary or “hair” bundles. These make contact with the tectorial membrane, which is deflected by incoming sound waves. Each bundle is composed of a group of stereocilia, organised spatially such that they increase in length across the bundle. A protein complex, the tip link complex, is located at the tip of each stereocilium and makes contact with adjacent stereocilia such that the bundle is displaced in a coordinated way upon deflection of the tectorial membrane [7]. Each stereocilium is made rigid by a central bundle of cross-linked actin microfilaments (F-actin) that contains fascin-2 and other actin-binding proteins [7, 9]. Myosins and an intracellular protein complex provide linkage between the tip complex and the F-actin bundle. Movements of the stereocilia activate an as yet unknown mechanotransducer channel and Ca2+ ion movements; in inner ear hair cells this initiates intracellular signals and second messengers that activate impulses in adjacent nerve cells [7]. Mutations in multiple components of the tip link complex, for example, cadherin-23, are causal for the deafness/blindness syndrome, Usher syndrome type I [7, 8, 10–12].

A less-utilised route towards the identification of genetic factors associated with hearing in humans is to build on recent studies of the proteome of hair cells and new identifications of hearing-associated genes in inbred strains of laboratory mice [13–15]. The proteomic studies in several species have revealed more comprehensively the complexity of inner ear cells and have identified previously unsuspected protein components of hair bundles [13]. Similarly, studies of early-onset hearing loss in laboratory mice have implicated a number of genes in hearing function for the first time [13, 15]. The relevance of many of these gene products or their encoding genes to human hearing function remains unclear. Furthermore, to our knowledge, genomic association studies of hearing function in humans, to date, have examined only adult populations.

In this study, we selected a suite of genes on the basis of recent published experimental evidence of localisation of their transcripts or protein products in hair cells, or new functional data that associate these genes with hearing function in mice [13–15]. To examine whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the selected genes are associated with variation in hearing function in children at age 11 years, we analysed the large Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) birth cohort [16] for possible associations. The results were further examined and validated with reference to a study of hearing function in European adults from isolated villages that was conducted within the international G-EAR consortium [17].

Methods

ALSPAC is a population-based prospective cohort study investigating factors that affect the health and development of children and their parents. The study methods are described in detail elsewhere [16, 18]. The study website contains details of all the data that is available through a searchable data dictionary http://www.bris.ac.uk/alspac/researchers/data-access/data-dictionary/. In brief, 14, 541 women who had an expected delivery date between April 1991 and December 1992 were enrolled in the study. 13,988 live born infants survived to at least one year of age. Children eligible for inclusion in our analysis had at least one audiometry test at 11 years of age (n = 7082); were of white ethnicity (n = 6212); and had DNA genotyping data available (n = 4970). The ALSPAC children have been genotyped previously using the Illumina HumanHap550 quad chip (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA) according to the stated protocol [19]. SNPs with a minor allele frequency of < 1 % or a call rate of < 95 % were removed from the dataset. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the ALSPAC Ethics and Law Committee and the Local Research Ethics Committees.

Genes of interest were identified on the basis of recent studies of hair cell or hair bundle proteomics and/or studies of early-onset hearing loss in inbred strains of laboratory mice [13–15] and genotyping data for all SNPs listed in these genes in NCBI dbSNP [20] were requested from ALSPAC. Information on SNPs was available for thirteen genes of interest (Table 1, which also indicates the rationale for including each gene in the analysis). CHD23 and PCDH15 were included in the set because of their known roles in inherited forms of deafness [11, 12, 21]. SNPs that had been genotyped within ALSPAC were made available in anonymised form (ALSPAC service level agreement B1480). Genotypic dosage for all SNPs of interest, which represents the expected number of the rare (SNP) allele in the range from 0 to 2 (where 0 is the most common allele and 2 represents homozygous for the rare allele), was used in the association analysis. Genotypes were checked for deviation from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium using the hwsnp function implemented in Stata (StataCorp LP, 2012, College Station, TX). Any SNP with evidence of violations of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p < 8.65×10−5), >5 % missing, or incorrect imputations, (as defined by a genotypic dosage more than 0.05 away from 0, 1 or 2), was discarded.

Table 1 Summary of the genes analysed in this study
Full size table

Population stratification

The top 10 principal components (PCs) that reflect the genetic structure of the population were estimated according to Price et al. [22] from genome-wide SNPs genotyped, imputed and cleaned in ALSPAC children, as described above. All 10 PCs were included as covariates in the regression models to account for confounding by population stratification.

Measures of hearing function

Hearing function of the cohort was examined using air conduction pure tone audiometry and an objective measure of cochlear function, otoacoustic emissions (OAE), at age 11 years. All tests were conducted by audiologists or trained physiology staff and measurements were carried out as described in Hall et al., 2012 [23]. Hearing thresholds were measured in both ears at 0.5 – 8 kHz according to the British Society of Audiology recommended procedure for audiometry [24]. For our analysis, the lowest threshold for each frequency, i.e., the ear with the best hearing, was used to create 2 new pure tone averages (PTA) by taking the PTA of the high/medium (3, 4 and 8 kHz) or the low/medium (0.5, 1 and 2 kHz) frequency hearing thresholds. This is standard practice in epidemiological studies of hearing [25].

Transient evoked OAE were measured in both ears and the OAE response level was measured from the unfiltered recordings and at 1, 2, 3 and 4 kHz as described in detail in Hall et al., 2012 [23]. In our analysis, to preserve statistical power, the unfiltered (broadband) recordings were used. Large OAE amplitudes are associated with better hearing function. The hearing levels of the ALSPAC subjects are listed in Table 2.

Table 2 Summary of hearing threshold levels and otoacoustic emission amplitudes in ALSPAC children
Full size table

Statistical methods

Haploview was used to calculate the number of LD blocks in the SNPs studied, using the solid spine of LD option [26]. A Bonferroni correction was applied by using the number of LD blocks across all the SNPs studied as an estimate of the number of independent tests in the sample, because linkage disequilibrium in association studies results in non-independent tests and an over-correction for Type 1 errors [27]. This method of correction has been criticised as insufficiently conservative for genome-wide association studies, but our study uses a limited number of SNPs from a relatively small set of genes [28].

Linear regression was used to determine if any of the SNPs correlated with an effect on the high- or low-frequency PTAs or the broadband OAE results, using the 10 principal components as co-variables. The analyses were also stratified by gender, because evidence from our validation study (see below) suggested that the observed effects were gender specific. The a priori threshold for significance to which the p-values were compared was calculated as 0.05/([the number of frequencies tested]*[the number of independent tests]); however, it is noted that this may still be conservative because the high and low frequency PTAs might be associated, making them non-independent tests. All analyses were carried out in Stata version 13 (StataCorp LP, 2012, College Station, TX). In the reporting of the effect sizes of the minor (SNP) alleles, a positive value represents reduced hearing and a negative value represents enhanced hearing.

External validation and combination of data

The most interesting results from our analysis of 11-year old children in ALSPAC were compared with an external genome-wide association study (GWAS) G-EAR, on the basis of the p-values and directions of effects. The full G-EAR study is described elsewhere [17], briefly, 3417 subjects within G-EAR aged 18 years or older were recruited from isolated villages in Italy and Croatia and underwent pure-tone audiometry, tympanometry, and acoustic reflex testing in both ears after any acoustically obstructing ear-wax had been removed. Analysis of hearing function was undertaken by calculating the PTA of air conduction using the best ear at the lower (0.25, 0.5, and 1 kHz), medium (0.5, 1, and 2 kHz), and high frequencies (4, 8 kHz). Each trait was regressed against age, sex and genomic kinship prior to analysis. For our study, the audiometry results in G-EAR were rank transformed because the data were skewed, unlike the data from ALSPAC which were approximately normally distributed.

The rank transformation of the G-EAR data limited the possible merging of results and comparison of effect sizes: rank transformations rank the data smallest to largest and force each data point’s rank value to a normal distribution with minimum value 0 and maximum value 1. Thus, the effect sizes in the G-EAR study related to an artificially created normal curve, but they were consistent with the ALSPAC study: i.e., positive effects imply worse hearing function.

Genomic loci of SNPs

The position of SNPs of interest within CTIF and LCP1 was examined with reference to dbSNP at NCBI and by BLASTN searches of the NCBI human genome GRCh38 primary assembly [29]. SNP positions were identified on reference assembly annotation release 105 using the table of reference sequence transcripts in the Map view function. Diagrams of gene structure for LCP1 and CTIF were prepared from exports from Ensembl 2014 [30], (CTIF from entry ENSG00000134030 and LCP1 from entry ENSG00000136167), and are presented in fancyGENE 1.4 [31].

Results

Identification of SNPs in CTIF and LCP1 that correlate with altered hearing in ALSPAC children

For the 7082 children for whom hearing data had been obtained at 11 years of age, 4970 (70.2 %) were of white ethnicity and had full genotypic data. 49 % (n = 2445) of the children were male. The data on hearing function for the 4970 children are summarised in Table 2. Genotypic data were available for 602 SNPs from the 13 genes of interest: 24 SNPs had >5 % incorrect imputations (defined as being >0.05 away from a whole number, where 0 was homozygous for the major allele, 1 was heterozygous and 2 was homozygous for the minor allele) and were removed and 1 SNP was out of HW equilibrium (no minor allele homozygotes), leaving a total of 577 SNPs from 13 genes for our analysis (Table 3).

Table 3 Summary of the study SNPs from ALSPAC
Full size table

Haploview’s solid spine of LD computed 118 groups of LD, which gave a sample-wide SNP threshold p-value of 0.00014 [0.05/(3*118) = 0.00014]. The effect size (β) of the regression represents the decibel (dB) change in the hearing threshold for the averaged frequencies for each copy of the minor allele; an increase indicates a detrimental effect on hearing function.

Two SNPs in the analysis achieved near-significance at the sample-wide level: rs12959910 in CTIF for the high frequency PTA (p = 0.00079, β = 0.61 dB, 95 % CI: 0.26-0.97) and rs10492452 in LCP1 for the low frequency PTA (p = 0.00056, β = 0.45 dB, 95 % CI: 0.20-0.71) (Table 4 and Additional file 1).

Table 4 Effect sizes of SNPs with the lowest p-values from the analysis of ALSPAC children
Full size table

CTIF SNPs and analysis of high frequency hearing function in ALSPAC children

In the analysis of high-frequency hearing function, eight out of the top ten smallest p-values were from SNPs in CTIF (Table 4). This finding, combined with the very low p-value of rs12959910, prompted us to seek validation for the results with CTIF for high frequencies in the G-EAR cohort. No other gene in either the non-stratified or the subgroup analyses warranted further investigation from the analysis of high-frequency hearing function (Additional file 1).

Examination of CTIF SNPs and high frequency hearing function in the G-EAR adult cohort

To our knowledge, a GWAS of hearing function in children has not been conducted. Therefore, we attempted validation of our findings from ALSPAC within the G-EAR cohort of adults over 18 years of age in isolated European populations, which had been designed to assess the hearing function and thresholds of isolated European populations within the international G-EAR consortium [17]. The 10 lowest p-values from the ALSPAC results for SNPs in CTIF are reported in Table 5 with the corresponding p-value from G-EAR. No SNP was found to have a clear effect in either the non-stratified or the sub-group analyses. The low p-value of rs12959910 was not replicated in the G-EAR cohort (p = 0.11).

Table 5 Effect sizes of SNPs in CTIF or LCP1 for averaged high or low frequency hearing compared between ALSPAC and G-EAR
Full size table

CTIF SNPs and analysis of otoacoustic emissions data from ALSPAC children and in the G-EAR cohort

From the 13 genes examined, only one SNP, rs7233521 in CTIF, showed a relationship with broadband OAE in the non-stratified and sub-group analyses of the ALSPAC cohort. The effect was specific to females and correlated with smaller amplitude OAE, i.e., poorer hearing function (females, p = 0.00000037, β = −1.64 dB, 95 % CI: −2.27 to −1.01; males, p = 0.46, β = 0.22 dB, 95 % CI: −0.36-0.80) (see Additional file 1 for OAE results). Notably, this SNP had the lowest p-value in females for low frequency hearing function (Table 4). No other SNP in CTIF had an effect on low frequency hearing in the ALSPAC cohort. However, in G-EAR, a possible sex-specific effect of rs7233521 on high frequency hearing was noted (p = 0.04 in females, p = 0.32 in males) (Additional file 1).

LCP1 SNPs and analysis of low frequency hearing function in ALSPAC children

In the non-stratified analysis of low frequency hearing for the ALSPAC children, 3 of the 10 lowest p-values were from SNPs in the LCP1 gene, including the SNP with the lowest p-value in our analysis, rs10492452 (p = 0.00056, β = 0.45 dB, 95 % CI: 0.20-0.71) (Table 4). Furthermore, LCP1 seemed to have some gender specificity, as the LCP1 SNP with the largest effect size, rs9567638, had a negative, (i.e., enhanced hearing), effect in girls (p = 0.0011, β = −1.76 dB, 95 % CI: −2.81 to −0.71) (Table 4) but a positive (i.e., reduced hearing) or null effect in boys (p = 0.23, β = 0.61 dB, 95 % CI: −0.41-1.6, likelihood ratio test p = 0.006). There were no differences in the proportion of minor (SNP) alleles between the genders (Tables 4 and 5). No other gene warranted further investigation in either the overall or the subgroup analyses of the low frequency hearing data in ALSPAC children.

Examination of LCP1 SNPs and low frequency hearing function in the G-EAR adult cohort

Given that only 3 % of the SNPs (18/577) under investigation are in LCP1, the above possible association prompted us to attempt to validate the LCP1 results for low frequency hearing against the G-EAR cohort. A notable result was obtained from the female subjects in G-EAR: rs17601960 in LCP1 had a large, sex-specific effect for averaged low frequencies of hearing. These included 0.125 kHz, a frequency that was not studied in ALSPAC (p = 0.0008432, see Additional file 1). This SNP is in the same LD group as rs9567638, which correlated with a large effect on low hearing frequencies in girls in ALSPAC (Table 4). Both SNPs have low minor allele frequencies (rs9567638 = 0.02, rs17601960 = 0.036), and reduce (i.e., improve) the low frequency hearing threshold. No other results were replicated in G-EAR (Table 5).

Genomic loci of identified SNPs of interest in CTIF and LCP1

The genomic loci of the SNPs of most interest from CTIF and LCP1 were identified in dbSNP and examined with regard to the human genome reference assembly. All five SNPs of interest: rs12959910 and rs7233521 in CTIF and rs10492452, rs17601960 and rs9567638 in LCP1, are intronic variants. The two SNPs in CTIF have distinct locations within the gene (Fig. 1a). Interestingly, rs17601960 and rs9567638 in LCP1, which are in the same LD group, are located in the same large intron. SNP rs10492452 has a distinct location in intron 12–13 (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Genomic loci of SNPs in CTIF and LCP1 found to correlate with altered hearing function in children and/or adult women. a, diagram of CTIF with the positions of implicated SNPs marked. b, diagram of LCP1 with the positions of implicated SNPs marked

Full size image

Discussion

This study demonstrates for the first time that SNPs in CTIF and LCP1 correlate with effects on hearing function in children at age 11. No individual SNP achieved our a priori overall sample-wide significance threshold, despite the size of the sample studied, although single SNPs from LCP1 and CTIF came close to this threshold. External validation against an adult population did not confirm a general involvement of CTIF or LCP1 in hearing function in adults. However, there was evidence of many SNPs in CTIF being detrimental to high frequency hearing in children, and evidence of a specific LD block in LCP1 being correlated with enhanced low frequency hearing in girls and adult women. No effect was observed on otoacoustic emissions, except for SNP rs7233521 in CTIF in females; this SNP had the lowest p-value for low frequency hearing results in ALSPAC. This SNP was not validated in the analysis of data from G-EAR. Nevertheless, given the extremely low p-value obtained in the ALSPAC cohort, this SNP may be a worthwhile target for future research.

In mice, Ctif is within the interval of ahl9, a quantitative trait locus correlated with early-onset, low frequency (4 kHz) hearing loss in BXD recombinant inbred mice [15]: mice hear between 1 to 70 kHz, whereas humans hear between 20 Hz to 20 kHz. So 4 kHz is “low frequency” for mice but not for humans. Ctif was demonstrated to be expressed in the mouse cochlea with an expression level that is influenced by the parental allele, but the exact sites of expression have yet to be established [15]. The CTIF protein is peri-nuclear and is expressed in many cell types. It is a component of the CBP80/20 translation initiation complex that has a role in nonsense-mediated mRNA decay [33]. Thus, alterations in CTIF levels or functionality could potentially affect many target mRNAs. Further research will be needed to establish the expression patterns and functional significance of CTIF in the inner ear.

The protein product of LCP1, designated plastin-2 or L-plastin, is a member of the plastin family of actin-binding proteins. The mammalian family also includes plastin-1, also known as I-plastin or fimbrin, which is highly expressed in intestine and kidney, and plastin-3 or T-plastin, which is expressed in most solid tissues [34, 35]. Plastin-2 has been characterised principally as a protein present in cells of haematopoietic lineages. In leukocytes, plastin-2 interacts with LFA-1 integrin and is important for leukocyte polarisation, migration and innate and adaptive immune responses. Lcp1−/− mice are viable but show defects in B cell development and immune responses [36, 37]. Up-regulation of plastin-2 occurs in various human cancers and a coding SNP in LCP1 has been correlated with gender- and tumour-stage specific prognostic significance in colorectal cancer recurrence [38, 39]. There are multiple reports that plastin-1 and plastin-3 are present in hair cells; specifically, in the F-actin bundles of stereocilia. Whereas plastin-1 is present in mature stereocilia, plastin-3 has been detected transiently in rat cochlea during hair cell differentiation [40–42]. Subsequent proteomics of hair bundles purified from chicken utricles demonstrated that plastin-1 and fascin-2 are the most abundant cross-linking proteins in these bundles; in addition, both plastin-2 and plastin-3 are present in low abundance [13, 32]. To our knowledge, these are the only data on plastin-2 in hair cells. Recently, plastin-1 (Pls1) gene knockout mice were found to have moderate, progressive hearing loss across all frequencies that correlated with morphological abnormalities of stereocilia in mature hair cells [43]. Investigations of Lcp1 gene knockout mice have focused on immunological functions.

In our study, the SNPs in LCP1 appeared to be sex-specific, were protective and had low minor allele frequencies, which could possibly represent a relatively new set of mutations. Because these are intronic SNPs, it is possible that their effects relate to mRNA stability. It would be helpful to conduct audiometry testing on Lcp1 knockout mice to determine if there is a causal relationship between Lcp1 and hearing function.

CTIF had an influence on high frequency but not low frequency hearing, whereas LCP1 affected only low frequency hearing; these differential frequency effects will require further investigation. It is interesting that the associations were observed with audiometry but not with otoacoustic emissions. Otoacoustic emissions are sensitive to the cochlear amplification function of the outer hair cells [44]. In this study, the lack of an association with OAEs implies that there is no measurable effect of the genes studied on outer hair cell cochlear amplification processes, with the possible exception of rs7233521 in CTIF in females.

CDH23 or PCDH15 were included in our study set of genes due to their known causal roles in inherited forms of deafness [1, 3, 24]. Whereas SNPs in PCDH15 were amongst those with the lowest p values for effects on high or low frequency hearing in ALSPAC (Table 4), no SNPs were returned from CDH23. This is likely because only a small number of CDH23 SNPs have been genotyped in ALSPAC. In comparison to CTIF, the other candidate genes examined from the syntenic region of human chromosome 18, ACAA2, C18orf32, DYM, MYO5B and SMAD7 (Table 1), did not show effects on hearing, although this could be explained by limitations in the study. The causes of sensorineural hearing loss are not known for individual children in ALSPAC; indeed, this is expected given that ALSPAC is a population study. To date, two genes known to be associated with hearing loss have been specifically examined within the cohort. The most common genetic cause of sensorineural hearing loss is the 35delG mutation of GJB2, which encodes the gap junction protein, connexin 26. No children with genotypic data within the cohort are homozygous for 35delG [16]. Also, none of the children in the cohort with the known mitochondrial DNA mutation 1555A- > G have hearing loss [45].

The major strengths of this study are the large number of children with accurate audiometry tests and full genotypic data, resulting in precise associations between SNPs and phenotype. To our knowledge, this is one of few studies to assess genetic contributions to hearing variation in children.

Several limitations are recognised. Due to the genotyping chip used, some of the selected genes were poorly represented by SNPs in ALSPAC to draw information from (e.g., FSCN-2, 1 SNP; HCN2, 3 SNPs; ESPNL, 5 SNPs; CDH23, 7 SNPs). Due to the above-mentioned scarcity of genome-wide association studies that have examined hearing in children, replication of our results could not be attempted in a dataset that tested children. The G-EAR dataset used for replication comprised adults with varying degrees of hearing loss, likely to be caused by age and environmental effects. The ALSPAC cohort at age 11 mostly had hearing thresholds within the normal range. The effect sizes of the G-EAR dataset could not be compared to ALSPAC due to differences in analysis methods. It is possible that effects on hearing of other genes studied were not detected due to: small effect sizes; the effect appearing after 11 years of age; the demographics of our study; or that functionally important regions of the genes were not covered by the SNPs examined.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates, for the first time, suggestive associations of SNPs in CTIF and LCP1 with effects on hearing function in children at age 11. Although these findings were not validated against an independent adult population, there was evidence of a sex-specific locus in LCP1 being correlated with enhanced low frequency hearing function in girls and adult women. Further studies of CTIF and LCP1 in relation to hearing function and hair cell physiology would be warranted.

Abbreviations

ALSPAC:

Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children

OAE:

Otoacoustic emissions

PTA:

Pure tone average

SNP:

Single nucleotide polymorphism

References

  1. Lin FR, Thorpe R, Gordon-Salant S, Ferrucci L. Hearing loss prevalence and risk factors among older adults in the United States. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011;66:582–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yamasoba T, Lin FR, Someya S, Kashio A, Sakamoto T, Kondo K. Current concepts in age-related hearing loss: epidemiology and mechanistic pathways. Hear Res. 2013;303:30–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Wake M, Tobin S, Cone-Wesson B, Dahl HH, Gillam L, McCormick L, et al. Slight/mild sensorineural hearing loss in children. Pediatrics. 2006;118:1842–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tharpe AM. Unilateral and mild bilateral hearing loss in children: past and current perspectives. Trends Amplif. 2008;12:7–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Mutai H, Suzuki N, Shimizu A, Torii C, Namba K, Morimoto N, et al. Diverse spectrum of rare deafness genes underlies early-childhood hearing loss in Japanese patients: a cross-sectional, multi-center next-generation sequencing study. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013;8:172.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Van Eyken E, Van Camp G, Van Laer L. The complexity of age-related hearing impairment: contributing environmental and genetic factors. Audiol Neurootol. 2007;12:345–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Richardson GP, de Monvel JB, Petit C. How the genetics of deafness illuminates auditory physiology. Annu Rev Physiol. 2011;73:311–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Camp G SR: Hereditary Hearing Loss Homepage [http://hereditaryhearingloss.org].

  9. Chou SW, Hwang P, Gomez G, Fernando CA, West MC, Pollock LM, et al. Fascin 2b is a component of stereocilia that lengthens actin-based protrusions. PLoS One. 2011;6, e14807.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Bonnet C, El-Amraoui A. Usher syndrome (sensorineural deafness and retinitis pigmentosa): pathogenesis, molecular diagnosis and therapeutic approaches. Curr Opin Neurol. 2012;25:42–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Miyagawa M, Nishio SY, Usami S. Prevalence and clinical features of hearing loss patients with CDH23 mutations: a large cohort study. PLoS One. 2012;7:e40366.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Noben-Trauth K, Zheng QY, Johnson KR. Association of cadherin 23 with polygenic inheritance and genetic modification of sensorineural hearing loss. Nat Genet. 2003;35:21–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Shin JB, Longo-Guess CM, Gagnon LH, Saylor KW, Dumont RA, Spinelli KJ, et al. The R109H variant of fascin-2, a developmentally regulated actin crosslinker in hair-cell stereocilia, underlies early-onset hearing loss of DBA/2J mice. J Neurosci. 2010;30:9683–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Torres AA, Rzadzinska AK, Ribeiro AF, Silva DA, Guenet JL, Massironi SM, et al. The circling mutant Pcdh15roda is a new mouse model for hearing loss. Mutat Res. 2013;751–752:29–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nagtegaal AP, Spijker S, Crins TT, Neuro-Bsik Mouse Phenomics C, Borst JG: A novel QTL underlying early-onset, low-frequency hearing loss in BXD recombinant inbred strains. Genes Brain Behav 2012;11(8):911–20.

  16. Boyd A, Golding J, Macleod J, Lawlor DA, Fraser A, Henderson J, et al. Cohort Profile: the 'children of the 90s' - the offspring index of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42:111–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Girotto G, Pirastu N, Sorice R, Biino G, Campbell H, d'Adamo AP, et al. Hearing function and thresholds: a genome-wide association study in European isolated populations identifies new loci and pathways. J Med Genet. 2011;48:369–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Golding J, Pembrey M, Jones R, Team AS. ALSPAC--the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. I Study methodology Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2001;15:74–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bristol University - ALSPAC GWAS data Generation [http://www.bristol.ac.uk/media-library/sites/alspac/migrated/documents/gwas-data-generation.pdf].

  20. NCBI SNP home page [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/].

  21. Ahmed ZM, Riazuddin S, Aye S, Ali RA, Venselaar H, Anwar S, et al. Gene structure and mutant alleles of PCDH15: nonsyndromic deafness DFNB23 and type 1 Usher syndrome. Hum Genet. 2008;124:215–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, Weinblatt ME, Shadick NA, Reich D. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2006;38:904–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hall A, Pembrey M, Lutman M, Steer C, Bitner-Glindzicz M. Prevalence and audiological features in carriers of GJB2 mutations, c.35delG and c.101T>C (p.M34T), in a UK population study. BMJ Open. 2012;2(4):3–8.

  24. British Society of Audiology Recommended Procedure: Pure tone air and bone conduction threshold audiometry with and without masking and determination of uncomfortable loudness levels. 2012, [http://www.thebsa.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/BSA_RP_PTA_FINAL_24Sept11_MinorAmend06Feb12.pdf].

  25. Niskar AS, Kieszak SM, Holmes A, Esteban E, Rubin C, Brody DJ. Prevalence of hearing loss among children 6 to 19 years of age: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. JAMA. 1998;279:1071–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. International HapMap C, Frazer KA, Ballinger DG, Cox DR, Hinds DA, Stuve LL, et al. A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs. Nature. 2007;449:851–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Duggal P, Gillanders EM, Holmes TN, Bailey-Wilson JE. Establishing an adjusted p-value threshold to control the family-wide type 1 error in genome wide association studies. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:516.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Johnson RC, Nelson GW, Troyer JL, Lautenberger JA, Kessing BD, Winkler CA, et al. Accounting for multiple comparisons in a genome-wide association study (GWAS). BMC Genomics. 2010;11:724.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kitts P: Genome Assembly and Annotation Process. 2002 Oct 9 [Updated 2003 Aug 13]. In: McEntyre J, Ostell J, editors. The NCBI Handbook [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Center for Biotechnology Information (US); 2002-. Chapter 14. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK21086/

  30. Flicek P, Amode MR, Barrell D, Beal K, Billis K, Brent S, et al. Ensembl 2014. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(Database issue):D749–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rambaldi D, CFD. FancyGene: dynamic visualization of gene structures and protein domain architectures on genomic loci. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2281–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Shin JB, Krey JF, Hassan A, Metlagel Z, Tauscher AN, Pagana JM, et al. Molecular architecture of the chick vestibular hair bundle. Nat Neurosci. 2013;16:365–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim KM, Cho H, Choi K, Kim J, Kim BW, Ko YG, et al. A new MIF4G domain-containing protein, CTIF, directs nuclear cap-binding protein CBP80/20-dependent translation. Genes Dev. 2009;23:2033–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Delanote V, Vandekerckhove J, Gettemans J. Plastins: versatile modulators of actin organization in (patho)physiological cellular processes. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2005;26:769–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Shinomiya H. Plastin family of actin-bundling proteins: its functions in leukocytes, neurons, intestines, and cancer. Int J Cell Biol. 2012;2012:213492.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Chen H, Mocsai A, Zhang H, Ding RX, Morisaki JH, White M, et al. Role for plastin in host defense distinguishes integrin signaling from cell adhesion and spreading. Immunity. 2003;19:95–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Morley SC. The actin-bundling protein L-plastin supports T-cell motility and activation. Immunol Rev. 2013;256:48–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Ning Y, Gerger A, Zhang W, Hanna DL, Yang D, Winder T, et al. Plastin polymorphisms predict gender- and stage-specific colon cancer recurrence after adjuvant chemotherapy. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13:528–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Park T, Chen ZP, Leavitt J. Activation of the leukocyte plastin gene occurs in most human cancer cells. Cancer Res. 1994;54:1775–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Daudet N, Lebart MC. Transient expression of the t-isoform of plastins/fimbrin in the stereocilia of developing auditory hair cells. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2002;53:326–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Drenckhahn D, Engel K, Hofer D, Merte C, Tilney L, Tilney M. Three different actin filament assemblies occur in every hair cell: each contains a specific actin crosslinking protein. J Cell Biol. 1991;112:641–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lee KH, Cotanche DA. Localization of the hair-cell-specific protein fimbrin during regeneration in the chicken cochlea. Audiol Neurootol. 1996;1:41–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Taylor R, Bullen A, Johnson SL, Grimm-Gunter EM, Rivero F, Marcotti W, et al. Absence of plastin 1 causes abnormal maintenance of hair cell stereocilia and a moderate form of hearing loss in mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24:37–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Schmiedt R. The Physiology of the Cochlear Presbycusis. In: Spinger Handbook of Auditory Research The Aging Auditory System, vol. 34. New York: Springer; 2010. p. 9–38.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bitner-Glindzicz M, Pembrey M, Duncan A, Heron J, Ring SM, Hall A, et al. Prevalence of mitochondrial 1555A-G mutation in European children. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:640–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ramakrishnan NA, Drescher MJ, Khan KM, Hatfield JS, Drescher DG. HCN1 and HCN2 proteins are expressed in cochlear hair cells: HCN1 can form a ternary complex with protocadherin 15 CD3 and F-actin-binding filamin A or can interact with HCN2. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:37628–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Horwitz GC, Lelli A, Géléoc GS, Holt JR. HCN channels are not required for mechanotransduction in sensory hair cells of the mouse inner ear. PLoS One. 2010;5:e8627.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the families who took part in ALSPAC, the midwives for their help in recruiting them, and the whole ALSPAC team that includes interviewers, computer and laboratory technicians, clerical workers, research scientists, volunteers, managers, receptionists and nurses. We thank Kate Northstone for acting as ALSPAC data buddy. Child GWAS data was generated by Sample Logistics and Genotyping Facilities at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute and LabCorp (Laboratory Corporation of America) with support from 23andMe. The UK Medical Research Council and the Wellcome Trust (Grant number102215/2/13/2) and the University of Bristol provide core support for ALSPAC. This publication is the work of the listed authors who will serve as guarantors for the contents of this paper. SH is funded by the Wellcome Trust Ph.D. programme in Molecular, Genetic and Lifecourse Epidemiology, grant number 102432/Z/13/Z.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK

    Sean Harrison, Sarah J. Lewis, Amanda J. Hall & Richard M. Martin

  2. Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34100, Trieste, Italy

    Dragana Vuckovic & Giorgia Girotto

  3. School of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK

    Josephine C. Adams

Authors
  1. Sean Harrison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sarah J. Lewis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amanda J. Hall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dragana Vuckovic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Giorgia Girotto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Richard M. Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Josephine C. Adams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Josephine C. Adams.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

Designed the study: JCA, AJH, SJL, RRM; contributed G-EAR data: DV, GG; analysed data: SH, SJL, AJH, RRM, JCA; prepared figure and tables: JCA, SH, AJH, SJL; drafted the paper: SH, SJL, AJH, RRM, JCA. All authors commented on the manuscript and all approved the final submission.

Additional file

Additional file 1:

Results for all the SNPs included in the analyses of data from ALSPAC or G-EAR.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harrison, S., Lewis, S.J., Hall, A.J. et al. Association of SNPs in LCP1 and CTIF with hearing in 11 year old children: Findings from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) birth cohort and the G-EAR consortium. BMC Med Genomics 8, 48 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-015-0112-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-015-0112-2

Keywords

BMC Medical Genomics

ISSN: 1755-8794

Contact us