This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
A unified analytic framework for prioritization of non-coding variants of uncertain significance in heritable breast and ovarian cancer
© Mucaki et al. 2016
Received: 11 August 2015
Accepted: 15 March 2016
Published: 11 April 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|11 Aug 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|28 Sep 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Zhi Han|
|24 Nov 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amanda Toland|
|29 Feb 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Eliseos Mucaki|
|17 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Salvador Pita-Fernandez|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|29 Feb 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amanda Toland|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Mar 2016||Editorially accepted|
|11 Apr 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12920-016-0178-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.