Attitudes to incorporating genomic risk assessments into population screening programs: the importance of purpose, context and deliberation
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|14 Dec 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cecelia A. Bellcross|
|24 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nora Pashayan|
|26 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christopher Gignoux|
|13 Mar 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Stuart Nicholls|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|13 Mar 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nora Pashayan|
|6 Apr 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cecelia A. Bellcross|
|29 Apr 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Stuart Nicholls|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Apr 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 May 2016||Editorially accepted|
|23 May 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12920-016-0186-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.