Skip to main content

Table 2 Self-reported diet and exercise changes after PGT

From: Diet and exercise changes following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing

  Full Sample
(n = 1,002)
Poor/Fair/Good
SRH (n = 449)
Very Good/Excellent SRH (n = 551) Tukey-Kramer adjusted p-valuea
Change % Paired t-test % Paired t-test % Paired t-test  
Fruit servings per days
 Decrease 24.0 Δ = 0.06
(-0.005, 0.12)
p = 0.07
21.2 Δ = 0.11
(0.02, 0.21)
p = 0.0148
26.1 Δ = 0.01
(-0.07, 0.10)
p = 0.77
0.7191
 No Change 49.0 50.1 48.3
 Increase 27.0 28.7 25.6
Vegetable servings per day
 Decrease 21.2 Δ = 0.11
(0.05, 0.17)
p = 0.0003
19.8 Δ = 0.16
(0.07, 0.25)
p = 0.0005
22.3 Δ = 0.06
(-0.01, 0.14)
p = 0.11
0.7032
 No Change 49.8 50.6 49.0
 Increase 29.0 29.6 28.7
Light exercise
 Decrease 35.2 Δ = -0.02
(-0.16, 0.13)
p = 0.80
31.2 Δ = 0.25
(0.03, 0.47)
p = 0.0263
38.7 Δ = -0.25
(-0.06, -0.44)
p = 0.0111
0.0452
 No Change 31.0 32.3 30.0
 Increase 33.8 36.5 31.3
Vigorous exercise
 Decrease 28.7 Δ = 0.09
(-0.02, 0.21)
p = 0.11
24.5 Δ = 0.23
(0.06, 0.41)
p = 0.0097
32.3 Δ = -0.02
(-0.18, 0.13)
p = 0.76
0.1236
 No Change 40.6 44.5 37.4
 Increase 30.7 31.0 30.3
Strength exercise
 Decrease 21.6 Δ = 0.14
(0.03, 0.25)
p = 0.0153
17.4 Δ = 0.19
(0.01, 0.37)
p = 0.0369
25.1 Δ = 0.10
(-0.05, 0.24)
p = 0.18
0.2690
 No Change 53.2 57.2 49.7
 Increase 25.2 25.4 25.2
  1. aAdjusted for baseline behavior, company, age, gender, education, income, race, ethnicity, baseline BMI, baseline self-reported health, season change