Clinical providers’ experiences with returning results from genomic sequencing: an interview study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|26 Jul 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|25 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Galen Joseph|
|10 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jan Lowery|
|15 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Deborah Cragun|
|5 Jan 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Julia Wynn|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 Jan 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Feb 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Galen Joseph|
|9 Feb 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jan Lowery|
|23 Feb 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Julia Wynn|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 Feb 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Apr 2018||Editorially accepted|
|8 May 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12920-018-0360-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.