Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Clinical providers’ experiences with returning results from genomic sequencing: an interview study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Jul 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Galen Joseph
10 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan Lowery
15 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Deborah Cragun
5 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Julia Wynn
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Galen Joseph
9 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan Lowery
23 Feb 2018 Author responded Author comments - Julia Wynn
Resubmission - Version 3
23 Feb 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
19 Apr 2018 Editorially accepted
8 May 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12920-018-0360-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement