Comprehensive analysis of prognostic value and immune infiltration of kindlin family members in non-small cell lung cancer

Table 1 The significant changes of Kindlis in transcription level (ONCOMINE database)

	Comparison groups	Fold change	P value	t-test	Sample size	References
FERMT1	LUSC versus Normal	11.152	1.76E−24	23.513	92	[28]
	LUAD versus Normal	3.430	1.57E−10	7.780	110	[28]
	LUAD versus Normal	2.190	1.26E−6	5.426	57	[29]
	LUAD versus Normal	2.058	1.39E−11	9.585	246	[30]
	LUSC versus Normal	2.993	2.20E−4	7.925	10	[31]
FERMT2	LUAD versus Normal	− 2.029	5.71E−13	− 8.760	110	[28]
	LCC versus Normal	− 2.873	6.81E−8	− 7.776	84	[28]
	LUSC versus Normal	− 3.049	1.22E−10	− 9.147	94	[28]
	LUAD versus Normal	− 2.571	5.08E−30	− 15.496	116	[32]
	LUAD versus Normal	− 3.053	9.39E−11	− 8.536	57	[29]
	LUAD versus Normal	− 2.417	6.56E−24	− 13.005	107	[33]
	LUAD versus Normal	− 2.590	3.44E−8	− 8.11	39	[34]
	LUSC versus Normal	− 4.045	1.21E−4	− 6.837	10	[31]
FERMT3	LCC versus Normal	− 3.541	8.33E−8	− 7.916	84	[28]

LUAD, lung adenocarcinoma; LUSC, lung squamous cell carcinoma. LCC, lung large cell carcinoma. Significant p-value in bold (threshold p ≤ 0.05)

ISSN: 1755-8794