Skip to main content

Table 2 Homozygous mutations and clinical phenotypes in five Pakistani CMT patients

From: Novel homozygous mutations in Pakistani families with Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease

Family ID

Gene

Mutationa

Type

Onset age (year)

Other symptom

Allele frequency

GERP

In silico predictionb

Note

1000G

gnomAD

PP2

MU

PRO

Fath

PaC2

SH3TC2

c.2599C > T;p.Q867*

CMT4C

3

Scoliosis

UR

UR

2.17

P

PaC3

SH3TC2

c.3650G > A;p.G1217D

CMT4C

3

Scoliosis, short stature

UR

1.6E−5

6.17

1.00*

0.10

− 5.79*

− 2.66*

P

PaC4

HK1

c.19C > T;p.R7*

CMT4G

1

 

UR

2.0E−5

1.13

P

PaC6

REEP1

c.247delG;p.G83Afs*44

SMARD/dHMN5B

 < 1

 

UR

UR

5.33

LP

PaC14

MFN2

c.334G > A;p.V112M

CMT2A2B

5

Vocal cord hoarseness

UR

1.6E−5

4.70

1.00*

0.32

− 2.76*

− 3.86*

P

  1. 1000G: 1000 Genomes Project, CMT: Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease, GERP: genomic evolutionary rate profiling score, gnomAD: Genome Aggregation Database, LP: likely pathogenic, P: pathogenic, LP: likely pathogenic, UR: unreported
  2. aReference DNA and protein sequences: SH3TC2: NM_024577.4 and NP_078853.2, HK1: NM_033498.3 and NP_277033.1, REEP1: NM_022912.3 and NP_075063.1, MFN2: NM_014874.3 and NP_055689.1
  3. bScores of PolyPhen-2 (PP2) ~ 1, MUpro (MU) < 0, PROVEAN (PRO) <  − 2.5, and Fathmm (Fath) <  − 1.5 indicate pathogenic prediction (*denotes a pathogenic prediction)