Peer Review reports
From: Molecular sampling of prostate cancer: a dilemma for predicting disease progression
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 3 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ken Hess |
| 17 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - George Vasmatzis |
| 24 Jan 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Rubin |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 24 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 29 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ken Hess |
| 21 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - George Vasmatzis |
| 1 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Rubin |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 1 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 5 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Rubin |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 5 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 10 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Rubin |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 10 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 16 Mar 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 16 Mar 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1755-8794-3-8 |
You can find further information about peer review here.