Table 2 Performance (AUC) comparison of the five predictive models
From: A coupling approach of a predictor and a descriptor for breast cancer prognosis
Data Set | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Avg. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DT | 0.74 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.82 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.73 |
ANN | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.70 |
SVM | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.80 |
SSL | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.8 | 0.78 | 0.8 | 0.78 |
SSL Co-training | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.81 |