Peer Review reports
From: MetaCNV - a consensus approach to infer accurate copy numbers from low coverage data
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
25 Sep 2019 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
12 Nov 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jesper Eisfeldt |
31 Jan 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Stefanie Friedrich |
24 Feb 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jesper Eisfeldt |
3 Mar 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Stefanie Friedrich |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
31 Jan 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
10 Mar 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jesper Eisfeldt |
31 Mar 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Stefanie Friedrich |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
31 Mar 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
2 Apr 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Stefanie Friedrich |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
2 Apr 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
2 May 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Stefanie Friedrich |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
2 May 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
12 May 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Stefanie Friedrich |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
12 May 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
18 May 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Stefanie Friedrich |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
18 May 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
20 May 2020 | Editorially accepted | |
1 Jun 2020 | Article published | 10.1186/s12920-020-00731-y |
You can find further information about peer review here.