Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: MetaCNV - a consensus approach to infer accurate copy numbers from low coverage data

Original Submission
25 Sep 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
31 Jan 2020 Author responded Author comments - Stefanie Friedrich
3 Mar 2020 Author responded Author comments - Stefanie Friedrich
12 Nov 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jesper Eisfeldt
24 Feb 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jesper Eisfeldt
Resubmission - Version 2
31 Jan 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 2
31 Mar 2020 Author responded Author comments - Stefanie Friedrich
10 Mar 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jesper Eisfeldt
Resubmission - Version 3
31 Mar 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Apr 2020 Author responded Author comments - Stefanie Friedrich
Resubmission - Version 4
2 Apr 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 4
2 May 2020 Author responded Author comments - Stefanie Friedrich
Resubmission - Version 5
2 May 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 5
12 May 2020 Author responded Author comments - Stefanie Friedrich
Resubmission - Version 6
12 May 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 6
18 May 2020 Author responded Author comments - Stefanie Friedrich
Resubmission - Version 7
18 May 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
20 May 2020 Editorially accepted
1 Jun 2020 Article published 10.1186/s12920-020-00731-y

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page
\