Peer Review reports
From: MetaCNV - a consensus approach to infer accurate copy numbers from low coverage data
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sep 2019 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 12 Nov 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jesper Eisfeldt |
| 31 Jan 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Stefanie Friedrich |
| 24 Feb 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jesper Eisfeldt |
| 3 Mar 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Stefanie Friedrich |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 31 Jan 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 10 Mar 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jesper Eisfeldt |
| 31 Mar 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Stefanie Friedrich |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 31 Mar 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 2 Apr 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Stefanie Friedrich |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 2 Apr 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 2 May 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Stefanie Friedrich |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 2 May 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 12 May 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Stefanie Friedrich |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 12 May 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 18 May 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Stefanie Friedrich |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 18 May 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 20 May 2020 | Editorially accepted | |
| 1 Jun 2020 | Article published | 10.1186/s12920-020-00731-y |
You can find further information about peer review here.