Skip to main content

Table 1 Detailed information on cancer types involved in this study

From: Conditional transcriptional relationships may serve as cancer prognostic markers

Cancer type (abbreviated)

Cancer type (full name)

Sample size in paired comparison

Sample size in survival analysis

Percentage of censored samples (%)

BRCA

Breast invasive carcinoma

112

980

89.1

COAD

Colon adenocarcinoma

26

N/A*

N/A*

COADREAD§

Colorectal adenocarcinoma

32

N/A*

N/A*

HNSC

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

43

477

60.6

KICH

Kidney chromophobe

25

N/A*

N/A*

KIPAN§

Pan-kidney cohort (KICH + KIRC + KIRP)

129

759

74.8

KIRC

Kidney renal clear cell carcinoma

72

461

67.9

KIRP

Kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma

32

257

85.6

LIHC

Liver hepatocellular carcinoma

50

320

70.0

LUAD

Lung adenocarcinoma

58

449

65.0

LUSC

Lung squamous cell carcinoma

51

444

59.5

PRAD

Prostate adenocarcinoma

52

445

97.8

THCA

Thyroid carcinoma

59

442

97.3

  1. §COADREAD and KIPAN were not among original TCGA panel of cancer types; they were complex cancer types derived by authors of R package TCGA2STAT
  2. *Three cancer types did not return at least ten significant DCLs in their respective CILP analysis, so they were not screened for prognosis DCLs via survival analysis