Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Clinicopathological investigation of secretory carcinoma cases including a successful treatment outcome using entrectinib for high-grade transformation: a case report

Original Submission
26 Jul 2020 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Nov 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
3 Nov 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
13 Nov 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
4 Jan 2021 Author responded Author comments - Kensuke Suzuki
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Jan 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Jan 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
26 Jan 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
19 Feb 2021 Author responded Author comments - Kensuke Suzuki
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Feb 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Apr 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
15 Jul 2021 Author responded Author comments - Kensuke Suzuki
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Jul 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 4
6 Aug 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
22 Aug 2021 Author responded Author comments - Kensuke Suzuki
Resubmission - Version 5
22 Aug 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 5
8 Sep 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
2 Dec 2021 Author responded Author comments - Kensuke Suzuki
Resubmission - Version 6
2 Dec 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 6
22 Dec 2021 Author responded Author comments - Kensuke Suzuki
Resubmission - Version 7
22 Dec 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
1 Jan 2022 Editorially accepted
6 Jan 2022 Article published 10.1186/s12920-022-01155-6

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page