Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Direct comparison of the next-generation sequencing and iTERT PCR methods for the diagnosis of TERT hotspot mutations in advanced solid cancers

Original Submission
3 Aug 2021 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Sep 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
12 Nov 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
6 Dec 2021 Author responded Author comments - Kyoung-Mee Kim
Resubmission - Version 4
6 Dec 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 4
15 Dec 2021 Author responded Author comments - Kyoung-Mee Kim
Resubmission - Version 5
15 Dec 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 5
27 Dec 2021 Author responded Author comments - Kyoung-Mee Kim
Resubmission - Version 6
27 Dec 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 6
5 Jan 2022 Author responded Author comments - Kyoung-Mee Kim
Resubmission - Version 7
5 Jan 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 7
13 Jan 2022 Author responded Author comments - Kyoung-Mee Kim
Resubmission - Version 8
13 Jan 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 8
31 Jan 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
31 Jan 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
2 Feb 2022 Editorially accepted
9 Feb 2022 Article published 10.1186/s12920-022-01175-2

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page