Skip to main content

Table 2 Genetic signals for VMS from primary GWAS analysis and secondary analyses of HRT proxy phenotypes

From: Insights into the genetics of menopausal vasomotor symptoms: genome-wide analyses of routinely-collected primary care health records

Analysis

Variant id

Chr:pos (b37)

EA/OA (EAF)

Phenotypea

Effect (95% CI) per allele

P

Distance to nearest gene

Primary discovery

rs34867104

chr4:104561892

AT/A (0.055)

VMS

OR = 0.78 (0.74,0.82)

1.7 × 10–20

TACR3 (0)

Meta-analysesb

rs112390256

chr4:104575473

A/G (0.055)

VMS

OR = 0.76 (0.72,0.80)

3.7 × 10–27

TACR3 (0)

Secondary discovery

rs34867104

chr4:104561892

AT/A (0.055)

Ever taken HRT

OR = 0.85 (0.82,0.87)

1.1 × 10–26

TACR3 (0)

Secondary discovery

rs146705358

chr4:104579107

AGGAATGTGCACAT/A (0.036)

Age ended HRT

-0.07 (-0.1,-0.05)

2.8 × 10–8

TACR3 (0)

Secondary discovery

rs200480420

chr6:135016903

A/AT (0.999)

Time taken HRT

-0.51 (-0.69,-0.33)

4.3 × 10–8

LINC01010 (+ 191.7 kb)

Secondary discovery

rs7830431

chr8:10700317

G/A (0.597)

Age started HRT

0.03 (0.02,0.04)

2.9 × 10–8

PINX1 (+2.9 kb)

  1. Chr chromosome, CI confidence interval, EA effect allele, EAF effect allele frequency, HRT hormone replacement therapy, OA other allele, OR odds ratio, pos position, VMS vasomotor symptoms
  2. aUnits for age started, ended and time taken HRT are standard deviations of the inverse rank transformed phenotype
  3. bVariant rs112390256 represents the same genetic signal in TACR3 as that identified from the primary discovery analysis since it is in linkage disequilibrium with rs34867104 (LD r2 = 0.99), which was not analysed in the earlier study