Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparisons of genotype distribution, allele frequency, and genetic models of rs10754558, rs7525979, rs35829419 and rs4612666 between the COM patients and healthy controls

From: Chronic osteomyelitis risk is associated with NLRP3 gene rs10754558 polymorphism in a Chinese Han Population

SNPs

Item

Allele or genotype

Patients

Controls

P values

OR (95% CI)

rs10754558

Genotype (n, %)

CC

139 (32.48)

135 (36.68)

0.053

NA

 

CG

232 (54.21)

169 (45.92)

 

GG

57 (13.32)

64 (17.39)

Allele frequency

C vs. G

510/346

439/297

0.978

0.997 (0.816–1.219)

Dominant model

CC + CG vs. GG

371/57

304/64

0.110

1.370 (0.930–2.019)

Recessive model

CC vs. CG + GG

139/289

135/233

0.213

0.830 (0.619–1.113)

Homozygous model

CC vs. GG

139/57

135/64

0.507

1.156 (0.753–1.774)

Heterozygous model

CG vs. GG

232/57

169/64

0.037

1.541 (1.025–2.319)

rs7525979

Genotype (n, %)

TT

8 (1.87)

14 (3.84)

0.120

NA

CT

106 (24.77)

102 (27.95)

CC

314 (73.36)

249 (68.22)

Allele frequency

T vs. C

122/734

130/600

0.054

0.767 (0.586–1.004)

Dominant model

TT + CT vs. CC

114/314

116/249

0.112

0.779 (0.573–1.060)

Recessive model

TT vs. CT + CC

8/420

14/351

0.093

0.478 (0.198–1.151)

Homozygous model

TT vs. CC

8/314

14/249

0.073

0.453 (0.187–1.097)

Heterozygous model

CT vs. CC

106/314

102/249

0.234

0.824 (0.599–1.133)

rs35829419

Genotype (n, %)

AA

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

NA

NA

AC

3 (0.70)

1 (0.27)

CC

424 (99.30)

367 (99.73)

Allele frequency

A vs. C

3/851

1/735

0.724

2.591 (0.269–24.963)

Dominant model

AA + AC vs. CC

3/424

1/367

0.724

2.597 (0.269– 25.071)

Recessive model

AA vs. AC + CC

0/427

0/368

NA

NA

Homozygous model

AA vs. CC

0/424

0/367

NA

NA

Heterozygous model

AC vs. CC

3/424

1/367

0.724

2.597 (0.269–25.071)

rs4612666

Genotype (n, %)

CC

114 (26.64)

98 (26.63)

0.422

NA

CT

224 (52.34)

179 (48.64)

TT

90 (21.03)

91 (24.73)

Allele frequency

C vs. T

452/404

375/361

0.461

1.077 (0.884–1.312)

Dominant model

CC + CT vs. TT

338/90

277/91

0.214

1.234 (0.885–1.719)

Recessive model

CC vs. GT + TT

114/314

98/270

0.999

1.000 (0.730–1.371)

Homozygous model

CC vs. TT

114/90

98/91

0.423

1.176 (0.791–1.750)

Heterozygous model

CT vs. TT

224/90

179/91

0.189

1.265 (0.890–1.798)

  1. COM: Chronic osteomyelitis; OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval, NA: not available