Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Generalizability of polygenic prediction models: how is the R2 defined on test data?

Original Submission
1 Sep 2023 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Nov 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
18 Mar 2024 Author responded Author comments - Christian Staerk
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Mar 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Mar 2024 Author responded Author comments - Christian Staerk
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Mar 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 3
21 Mar 2024 Author responded Author comments - Christian Staerk
Resubmission - Version 4
21 Mar 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 4
24 Apr 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
2 May 2024 Author responded Author comments - Christian Staerk
Resubmission - Version 5
2 May 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 5
3 May 2024 Author responded Author comments - Christian Staerk
Resubmission - Version 6
3 May 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 6
4 May 2024 Author responded Author comments - Christian Staerk
Resubmission - Version 7
4 May 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 7
7 May 2024 Author responded Author comments - Christian Staerk
Resubmission - Version 8
7 May 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
8 May 2024 Editorially accepted
16 May 2024 Article published 10.1186/s12920-024-01905-8

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page