Skip to main content

A sporadic case of congenital aniridia caused by pericentric inversion inv(11)(p13q14) associated with a 977 kb deletion in the 11p13 region



Because of the significant occurrence of “WAGR-region” deletions among de novo mutations detected in congenital aniridia, DNA diagnosis is critical for all sporadic cases of aniridia due to its help in making an early diagnosis of WAGR syndrome. Standard cytogenetic karyotype study is a necessary step of molecular diagnostics in patients with deletions and in the patients’ parents as it reveals complex chromosomal rearrangements and the risk of having another affected child, as well as to provide prenatal and/or preimplantation diagnostics.

Case presentation

DNA samples were obtained from the proband (a 2-year-old boy) and his two healthy parents. Molecular analysis revealed a 977.065 kb deletion that removed loci of the ELP4, PAX6, and RCN1 genes but did not affect the coding sequence of the WT1 gene. The deletion occurred de novo on the paternal allele. The patient had normal karyotype 46,XY and a de novo pericentric inversion of chromosome 11, inv(11)(p13q14).


We confirmed the diagnosis of congenital aniridia at the molecular level. For the patient, the risk of developing Wilms’ tumor is similar to that in the general population. The recurrence risk for sibs in the family is low, but considering the possibility of gonadal mosaicism, it is higher than in the general population.


Aniridia (OMIM #106210 [1]) is a Mendelian autosomal dominant complex congenital developmental disorder that can affect all eye structures as well as central nervous system, the endocrine system, and other systems and organs [2, 3]. Congenital aniridia (AN) is caused by heterozygous mutations in the PAX6 gene (OMIM *607108; 11p13) or 11p13 deletions. Small intragenic mutations have been found in about 50–70% of aniridia cases, and large chromosome rearrangements are found in about 30–40%. Deletions can involve one or more exons, the entire PAX6 gene and several neighboring genes, as well as 3′-cis-regulatory region, with some expanded deletions capture area including genes PAX6 and WT1 [4, 5]. This last type of 11p13 chromosome region deletions is known as WAGR-region deletions. They occur in 7–12% of all cases and in approximately 30% of sporadic cases of congenital aniridia, and they lead to WAGR syndrome (OMIM #194072, Wilms’ tumor, Aniridia, Genitourinary anomalies, and development Retardation) [6].

The median age of development of WAGR-associated kidney tumor is about 2 years old. In newborns, WAGR syndrome can be manifested by a single sign – aniridia or hypoplasia of the iris. De novo chromosome deletion of the “WAGR-region” determined in a patient with sporadic aniridia increases the risk of Wilms’ tumor dramatically. Wilms’ tumor develops in 40–60% of patients with “WAGR-region” deletions [7, 8].

Molecular diagnostics is therefore needed to be taken as soon as possible. In addition, some chromosome rearrangements involving 11p13 are known to be more complex than simple interstitial deletions [9]. If healthy parents have balanced chromosome rearrangements, the risk of having another affected child increases significantly. In this scenario deletions are formed because of inversions or translocations. Such deletions constitute as many as 10–17% of all detected 11p13 chromosome rearrangements [9, 10].

Here we present comprehensive DNA diagnosis of a sporadic case of congenital aniridia with hydrocephalus and early CNS damage associated with pericentric chromosome 11 inversion with an approximately 1-Mb deletion at the breakpoint in the 11p13 region. The applied approaches in this and other cases of complex 11p13 chromosome rearrangements help to make early differential diagnosis of WAGR syndrome and to determine the risk having the parents having another affected child.

Case presentation

The patient is a 2-year-old boy, the second child in the family. His elder brother and parents are healthy. Ophthalmological, neurological, and ultrasonographic examination of the patient showed complete aniridia, cataract, optic disc hypoplasia and partial atrophy of the optic nerves, foveal hypoplasia, nystagmus, hypotalamia (shallow anterior chamber), high hypermetropia, and strabismus; (Fig. 1), as well as early organic CNS damage, hydrocephalus, brain vascular plexus cysts, developmental delay, myotonic syndrome, pes valgus, ataxia, and emotional lability. In addition, short stature, gallbladder dysfunction, reactive pancreatitis, iodine deficiency, anemia, celiac disease, atopic dermatitis, open oval window, and umbilical hernia were observed.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Slit lamp view of left and right eye (top); Single fundus photograph of left and right eye (bottom)

Initial cytogenetic study revealed the normal karyotype 46,XY and pericentric inversion of chromosome 11, inv(11)(p13q14) (Fig. 2 a, b). The best resolution of the karyotyping was about 10 Mb. Inversion was not identified in the healthy parents of the proband with normal karyotype (data not shown) thus it was assumed to occur de novo. Such an inversion could lead to the patient’s phenotype with aniridia in two ways: either through the so-called position effect earlier described for AN [11], or through the loss of genomic material at the rearrangement break points. In the latter case the refinement of the deletion boundaries is crucial due to the vicinity of the WT1 gene.

Fig. 2
figure 2

a. Patient’s karyotype. b. Detailed view on derivative chromosome 11 and ideogram view. c. FISH analysis on WT1 locus. d. MLPA analysis for the 11p13 region. e. CMA analysis of the 11p13 region

To determine a possible chromosome disbalance in the 11p13 region, multiplex ligase-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) analysis was applied using the SALSA MLPA of P219-B2 PAX6 probes (MRC-Holland, Amsterdam, the Netherlands). The MLPA analysis showed a deletion stretched for at least 668 kb in 11p13 region (hg19::chr11:g.(30255690_31671656)_(32339851_32410037)del) and removed loci of the ELP4, PAX6, and RCN1 genes, and it did not affect the WT1 gene (Fig. 2d). This was confirmed by normal fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) pattern with a specific probe for the WT1 gene locus (FA0275, Abnova, Taiwan) and 11p region (CEN11p, FC0096, Abnova). (Fig. 2c). Further high-resolution chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) with CytoScan HD array (2.67 M probes, ThermoFisher Scientific, MA USA) specified the deletion region to be 977.065 kb (arr [GRCh37] 11p13(31400114_32377179)×1) (Fig. 2e). The CMA revealed no meaningful disbalance of more than 10 kb in the 11q14 region at the other side of the inversion.

Discussion and conclusions

Thus, we have established molecular-genetic confirmation of the congenital aniridia diagnosis of the proband. The deletion and inversion identified in the proband was not found in his parents, and the risk of the birth of another child with aniridia in the family is slightly higher than in the general population (0.001%) considering the possibility of gonadal mosaicism and, thus, requires the prenatal diagnosis if needed. For the patient, the risk of development of Wilms’ tumor is similar to the risk in the general population (0.01%) [12].

Balanced chromosomal rearrangement is a possible mechanism for the formation of the 11p13 deletion, because such chromosomal deletion is a very frequent cause of AN (determined in one third of cases) [6]. Nevertheless, there are only a few descriptions of chromosome 11 inversions in the literature [13].

Our proband, like some other aniridic patients, exhibits complex congenital eye malformation accompanied by the involvement of the central nervous system and other systems. About 10% of patients with aniridia have been described to have systemic features, such as: myotonic syndrome, developmental delay, sleep disturbance, and emotional lability, and less often (< 10%) seizures, epilepsy, and other neurological complications, as well as endocrine dysfunction of the pituitary gland, thyroid, and pancreas, malformations of the kidneys and urinary and gall bladders, immune diseases, and connective tissue and skeletal defects [14].

All these observations point to syndromic character of the hereditary disorder of congenital aniridia. For this reason, the term “PAX6 syndrome” has recently come into use, as it is more appropriate than just “congenital aniridia” [6, 15]. Thus, our patient has severe syndromic character of congenital aniridia. On one hand, the severity of aniridia phenotype including systemic complications is not determined solely by the type of mutation, and it can be different for all types of mutations, including large deletions of the 11p13 region [16]. On the other hand, while a causative mutation is chromosomal deletion, decrease of function of several genes captured within the deleted region could be responsible for systemic complications observed in patients. The question of the contribution of PAX6 neighboring genes in the 11p13 region to the manifestation of congenital aniridia remains open. Additionally, when chromosome rearrangements are complex, spatial genomic disorganization could worsen the severity of systemic complications [17, 18]. It was recently shown that chromosomal aberrations might not lead to disbalance due to gain or loss of genetic material but rather to the disruption of topologically associating domains (TADs), when a large structural variant might disrupt a CTCF-binding boundary, leading to changes in regulation of unaffected genes [19].

This reported case of congenital aniridia in our patient with a pericentric inversion associated with a 977.065-kb deletion at the breakpoint in the 11p13 region demonstrates the need for thorough genetic analyses in all cases of congenital aniridia caused by chromosomal disbalance in 11p13 for both probands and their parents.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.



Congenital aniridia


Chromosomal microarray analysis


Central nervous system


Fluorescence in situ hybridization


Multiplex ligase-dependent probe amplification


Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man


Topologically associating domains

WAGR syndrome:

Wilms’ tumor, Aniridia, Genitourinary anomalies, and development Retardation


  1. Amberger JS, Bocchini CA, Scott AF, Hamosh A. leveraging knowledge across phenotype-gene relationships. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D1038–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dansault A, David G, Schwartz C, et al. Three new PAX6 mutations including one causing an unusual ophthalmic phenotype associated with neurodevelopmental abnormalities. Mol Vis. 2007;13:511–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Vasilyeva TA, Voskresenskaya AA, Khlebnikova OV, et al. Genetic approaches to differential diagnosis of hereditary forms of congenital Aniridia. Vestn Ross Akad Med Nauk. 2017;72(4):233–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Miller RW, Fraumeni JF Jr, Manning MD. Association of Wilms’s tumor with aniridia, hemihypertrophy and other congenital malformations. N Engl J Med. 1964;270:922–7.

  5. Yamamoto T, Togawa M, Shimada S, et al. Narrowing of the responsible region for severe developmental delay and autistic behaviors in WAGR syndrome down to 1.6 Mb including PAX6, WT1, and PRRG4. Am J Med Genet A. 2014;164A(3):634–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vasilyeva TA, Voskresenskaya AA, Käsmann-Kellner B, et al. Molecular analysis of patients with aniridia in Russian Federation broadens the spectrum of PAX6 mutations. Clin Genet. 2017;92(6):639–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Grønskov K, Olsen JH, Sand A, et al. Population-based risk estimates of Wilms tumor in sporadic aniridia. A comprehensive mutation screening procedure of PAX6 identifies 80% of mutations in aniridia. Hum Genet. 2001;109(1):11–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Marakhonov AV, Vasilyeva TA, Voskresenskaya AA, et al. LMO2 gene deletions significantly worsen the prognosis of Wilms’ tumor development in patients with WAGR syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2019;28(19):3323–6.

  9. Robinson DO, Howarth RJ, Williamson KA, et al. Genetic analysis of chromosome 11p13 and the PAX6 gene in a series of 125 cases referred with aniridia. Am J Med Genet A. 2008;146A(5):558–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Crolla JA, van Heyningen V. Frequent chromosome aberrations revealed by molecular cytogenetic studies in patients with aniridia. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;71(5):1138–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fantes J, Redeker B, Breen M, et al. Aniridia-associated cytogenetic rearrangements suggest that a position effect may cause the mutant phenotype. Hum Mol Genet. 1995;4(3):415–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Orphanet Report Series - Prevalence of rare diseases: Bibliographic data - January 2019 - Number 1 : Diseases listed in alphabetical order. 2019.

  13. Balay L, Totten E, Okada L, et al. A familial pericentric inversion of chromosome 11 associated with a microdeletion of 163 kb and microduplication of 288 kb at 11p13 and 11q22.3 without aniridia or eye anomalies. Am J Med Genet A. 2016;170A(1):202–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Netland PA, Scott ML, Boyle JWT, Lauderdale JD. Ocular and systemic findings in a survey of aniridia subjects. J AAPOS. 2011;15(6):562–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Käsmann-Kellner B, Seitz B. Aniridia syndrome: clinical findings, problematic courses and suggestions for optimization of care (“aniridia guide”). Ophthalmologe. 2014;111(12):1145–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tzoulaki I, White IM, Hanson IM. PAX6 mutations: genotype-phenotype correlations. BMC Genet. 2005;6:27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sazer S, Schiessel H. The biology and polymer physics underlying large-scale chromosome organization. Traffic. 2018;19(2):87–104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Aristidou C, Theodosiou A, Bak M, et al. Position effect, cryptic complexity, and direct gene disruption as disease mechanisms in de novo apparently balanced translocation cases. PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0205298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Spielmann M, Lupianez DG, Mundlos S. Structural variation in the 3D genome. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19(7):453–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Dr. Richard H. Lozier for interest in our work and useful editorial assistance. We also are thankful patient’s family and physicians at the “Regional Children Hospital”, Nizhnevartovsk city, Russia.

About the supplement

This article has been published as part of BMC Medical Genomics Volume 13 Supplement 8, 2020: Selected Topics in “Systems Biology and Bioinformatics” - 2019: medical genomics. The full contents of the supplement are available online at


Publication costs have been funded by the Russian Science Foundation (RSF grant № 17-15-01051) and the state assignment of Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



TAV performed molecular genetic analysis, interpreted the patient’s data, and participated in the writing of the manuscript; AVM interpreted the patient’s CMA data, and participated in writing the manuscript; MEM, ZGM, NVSh, IAK performed karyotyping; NVP performed molecular genetic analysis; PAK, DVP, IVK, SAK performed molecular cytogenetic analyses; NVS and VVK performed ophthalmological and medical genetic examination; SIK and RAZ designed the study and helped supervise the project. All authors read and approved the final draft of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tatyana A. Vasilyeva or Andrey V. Marakhonov.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The clinical and molecular genetic study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Research Centre for Medical Genetics, Moscow, Russia, with written informed consent obtained from each participant and/or their legal representative as appropriate.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s parent or guardian for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vasilyeva, T.A., Marakhonov, A.V., Minzhenkova, M.E. et al. A sporadic case of congenital aniridia caused by pericentric inversion inv(11)(p13q14) associated with a 977 kb deletion in the 11p13 region. BMC Med Genomics 13 (Suppl 8), 130 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: