Skip to main content

A novel USH2A variant in a patient with hearing loss and prenatal diagnosis of a familial fetus: a case report

Abstract

Background

Usher syndrome (USH) is the most common cause of inherited deaf-blindness. The current study aimed to identify pathogenic variants in a Chinese patient with hearing loss and to report the identification of a novel p.(Phe1583Leufs*10) variant in USH2A, which met the needs of prenatal diagnosis of the patient's mother.

Case presentation

Genomic DNA obtained from a five-year-old girl with hearing loss was analyzed via the hearing loss-targeted gene panels. We identified the compound heterozygous variants c.8559-2A>G and c.4749delT in Usher syndrome type 2A (USH2A) gene as the underlying cause of the patient; the former variation has been reported in the literature, but not the latter. The parents of the girl were heterozygous carriers. The two variants were classified as pathogenic. Based on these findings, amniotic fluid samples were used for prenatal diagnosis of the couple's fetus, which was found to carry c.4749delT but not c.8559-2A>G variation. During the follow-up period of more than 9 months after the birth of the fetus, it was confirmed that the infant was healthy.

Conclusions

The results of the present study identified two compound heterozygous USH2A variants in a patient with hearing loss and reported a novel USH2A variant which expands the spectrum of USH2A variants in USH.

Peer Review reports

Background

Usher syndrome (USH) is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous autosomal recessive disorder characterized by deafness and vision loss. Clinically, USH is divided into Type I (USH1), Type II (USH2), and Type III (USH3) [1]. The phenotypes of USH1 patients include congenital severe-to-profound deafness, vestibular areflexia, and onset of retinitis pigmentosa (RP) within the first decade of life; USH2 manifests as moderate-to-severe hearing loss, normal vestibular function, and onset of RP within the second decade of life; and USH3 is characterized by hearing loss, vestibular dysfunction, and onset of progressive, sporadic, and variable RP [2]. USH2 is the most common form of USH, and the Usher syndrome type 2A (USH2A) gene is thought to be involved in 74–90% of USH2 cases [3,4,5]. The USH2A gene was mapped to chromosome 1q41, with 72 exons and coding integral membrane protein usherin of 5202 amino acids (NM_206933.4). There are two isoforms of USH2A: a 170 kDa short isoform translated from 21 exons and a 580 kDa long isoform translated from an additional 51 exons [6].

In this study, two compound heterozygous pathogenic variants were identified in the proband, who presented bilateral moderate deafness. Based on the needs of the mother for prenatal diagnosis of deafness and the results of this study, we provide prenatal diagnosis for the fetus in this family. At the same time, we reviewed the relevant literature and explored the main clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of USH2. The findings of this study can further enrich the database of pathogenic variation of the USH2A gene in the Chinese population and provide important information for carrier screening, molecular diagnosis, and prenatal diagnosis of USH2A patients.

Case presentation

Clinical findings

A four-month pregnant, 35-year-old G3P1+1 Chinese woman came to the genetic consulting clinic of West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University. The woman informed the doctor that she had an artificial abortion during her first pregnancy. She gave birth to a girl (the proband) at term following her second pregnancy; the child, who is now five years old, failed to pass otoacoustic emission bilaterally hearing screening at birth. We know from her medical records that she was examined in another hospital and diagnosed with moderate hearing loss in both ears (55 dB / 60 dB) more than one year ago; she subsequently began to wear hearing aids. The proband without absence of vestibular dysfunction, vision, or visual field involvement as her medical records. At present, the proband can communicate normally, without any other abnormal clinical manifestations. The parents of the girl are healthy and do not have a consanguineous marriage. The mother denied exposure to teratogenic environmental factors during pregnancy. The pedigree of this family is shown in Fig. 1. The woman asked for prenatal diagnosis of the fetus in the current pregnancy.

Fig. 1
figure1

Pedigree of the patient’s family. There is only one affected individual. Males are represented by squares, females are represented by circles, and triangle refers to abortion in early pregnancy

Disease-targeted gene panel and Sanger sequence

Genomic DNA (gDNA) from the proband and her parents were extracted from leucocytes of peripheral blood samples using the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen bioinformatics, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's standard extraction procedures. The quality and concentration of gDNA were assessed with the NanoDrop 1000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilimington, USA). For the proband, targeted gDNA was captured and enriched using two disease-targeted gene panels, the CM1132 Targeted Exome Capture Kit and M113 Mitochondrial Whole Gene Capture Kit (MyGenostics, Beijing, China), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The CM1132 kit targeted 162 genes (Additional file 1: Table S1) known to cause deafness (include the genes’ whole exome, Coding + flanking intronic regions (10 bp) + deep intronic variants included in HGMD database), while the M113 kit (include the whole mitochondrial gene) contained two pathogenic hot-spot variants (NC_01292.1: m.1494C>T; NC_01292.1: m.1555A>G in MT-RNR1) that cause deafness. The captured and enriched gDNA libraries were sequenced using the NextSeq 500 platform (Illumina, California, USA) to generate paired-end reads for 150 cycles per reads. Adaptor, low quality, multiple N and short reads (< 40 bp) were removed by Cutadapt, and then the reads were mapped to the human genome reference (UCSCGRCh37/hg19) by the Burrows–Wheeler Aligner (BWA-MEM, version 0.7.10; https://www.plob.org/tag/bwa). Variants were called using the Genome Analysis Tool Kit (GaTK,version 4.0.8.1; https://www.broadinstitute.org/gatk/). annovar (version 1; http://annovar.openbioinformatics.org/en/latest/) was used to annotate the variants. After that, all the variants were filtered based on their frequency in public databases 1000 Genomes Project (http://browser.1000genomes.org), ExAC (http://exac.broadinstitute.org/), gnomad (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/), Esp6500.

(http://evs.gs.washington.edu/eVS) and human genome variant database (HGMD; https://portal.biobase-international.com/cgi-bin/portal/login.cgi). The variants with MAF < 0.05 were retained. Then, we applied several variant prediction tools including SIFT (http://provean.jcvi.org/), PolyPhen2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/), MuatationTaster (http://www.mutationtaster.org/),GERP++ (http://mendel.stanford.edu/sidowlab/downloads/gerp/index.html) and SPIDEX (http://tools.genes.toronto.edu/), to predict the functional impact of candidate variants.

Finally, the pathogenicities of the detected sequence variations were analyzed according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines [7] and Expert Specification of the ACMG/AMP Variant interpretation Guidelines for genetic Hearing Loss [8]. To confirm the variations found in the USH2A gene, Sanger sequencing was performed for the patient and her parents. The variation sites and amplification primers were as follows: c.8559-2 (forward 5′-GCCCAGAACTAAATGCCAGC-3′, reverse 5′-CCACGCATATATCACACGCA-3′) and c.4749 (forward 5′-CCTCAGTACCAGGCACCTAC-3′, reverse 5′-GCATTAAGGCCAGCTTTCGA-3′). The Sanger sequencing data were analyzed using Chromas software (http://technelysium.com.au/wp/chromas/).

Prenatal diagnosis

Amniocentesis was performed at 20+5 weeks of gestation. Then, 20 ml amniotic fluid was collected, of which 16 ml was used for G-banding karyotype analysis (due to advanced maternal age) and the remaining 4 ml was used for prenatal diagnosis of the USH2A gene. The gDNA of amniotic fluid cells was extracted by DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen bioinformatics, Hilden, Germany) [9]. First, the relationship between the family samples was confirmed by short tandem repeat analysis (DAAN gene, Guangzhou, China), which revealed that there was no maternal cell contamination in the amniotic fluid. Then, the nucleotide sequences of c.8559-2 and c.4749 position of USH2A genes in amniotic fluid cells were analyzed by Sanger sequencing.

Genetic findings

The average sequencing depth of the mitochondrial whole gene region was 4211X and no variant related to hearing loss was found in the M113 panel. With an average sequencing depth of 789X on the targeted regions, we identified 1610 genetic variants in the CM1132 panel. After extensive bioinformatics analysis, the two variants of the USH2A gene (c.4749delT in exon 22 and c.8559-2A>G in exon 43, NM_206933.4) of the proband needed further Sanger sequencing and family verification. Sanger sequencing of the family members showed that the proband was compound heterozygous, and that the parents were heterozygous carriers (Fig. 2a, b). The c.4749delT variant had not been reported in the general population databases and our results demonstrated that the deletion of the T nucleotides at exon 22 of USH2A is predicted to leads to a frameshift variant. This novel frameshift variant results in a premature stop-codon downstream of the variant p.(Phe1583Leufs*10), which has not been reported in the literature or databases. The frequency of c.8559-2A>G variant in gnomAD is ALL:0.0032%–EAS:0.043% (found in 8 individuals from East Asia). The variant is reported 10 times in the ClinVar (Variation ID:48604) database and published 16 times regarding to HGMD Professional 2020.4, several reports from China. Furthermore, RT-PCR analysis from a patient has been carrying out [10].

Fig. 2
figure2

Sanger sequencing confirmation of the variants in USH2A identified in this study. a Sequences of the heterozygous splicing variant c.8559-2A>G and the corresponding wild-type sequence. b Sequences of the heterozygous frameshift variant c.4749delT (p.(Phe1583Leufs*10)) and the corresponding wild-type sequence

The result of the G-banding karyotype analysis of amniotic fluid cells showed 46, XY. The gene analysis of USH2A in amniotic fluid cells showed that there was a heterozygous variation (c.4749delT), but no variant at c.8559-2 (Fig. 2a, b). We followed up the fetus for 13 months; the mother of the proband delivered a baby boy with a height of 52 cm and weight of 4.4 kg at 40+ 1 weeks of gestation. The baby had normal hearing screening response after birth. He was checked regularly at the children's health care department and has not displayed any hearing problem or other abnormal phenotypes so far (9 months old).

Discussion and conclusions

Usher syndrome is a severe disease resulting in significant vision and hearing impairments. Based on the phenotypic characterization, the disease has been classified into three subtypes [11]. USH2 patients show moderate-to-severe hearing loss, intact vestibular function, and onset of Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) within the second decade of life [12]. The patient in our study was five years old and exhibited bilateral moderate deafness, without absence of vestibular dysfunction, vision, or visual field involvement. Because RP in USH2 patients usually occurs after puberty, this proband cannot be excluded as USH2. However, there is considerable variability within the subtypes resulting in overlapping phenotypes between USH1, USH2, and USH3 [3,4,5]. Therefore, the diagnosis of USH in childhood may be difficult because although some features exist at birth, others appear as the child matures. Genetic testing should be undertaken when the clinical phenotype does not enable clear clinical diagnosis.

To date, sixteen genes have been reported to be associated with USH: nine are involved in USH1, three in USH2, two in USH3, and two are not specified. The USH2A, USH2C and USH2D genes are responsible for USH2 [13]. Due to the large number of coding exons existing in these genes, Sanger sequencing is not feasible for clinical application. In this study, we therefore attempted to target a group of genes responsible for hearing loss, including the USH2A, USH2C, and USH2D genes. As a result, we have proven that targeted deep exome sequencing of 162 known causative genes of hearing loss can serve as a fast and efficient way to diagnose USH2. Compared with whole exome sequencing and whole genome sequencing, the cost of the disease-targeted gene panel was much lower and the workload was lesser [14].

The USH2A gene, located on chromosome 1q41, consists of 72 exons. In mammalian photoreceptors, usherin is localized to a spatially restricted membrane microdomain at the apical inner segment recess that wraps around the connecting cilia, corresponding to the periciliary ridge complex described in amphibian photoreceptors [12]. USH2A gene variants have been implicated in the disease etiology of several inherited diseases, including USH2, nonsyndromic RP, and nonsyndromic deafness [15]. To date, 1348 variants in the USH2A gene have been reported in patients with USH2 or RP in the HGMD Professional 2020.4. Here, we reported two variants of USH2A, including one frameshift variant (c.4749delT, p.(Phe1583Leufs*10)) and one splicing variant (c.8559-2A>G),in the patient with hearing loss; the former variant was novel,while the later has been previously reported [16]. According to the criteria of ACMG and the Expert Specification of the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines for Genetic Hearing Loss, the frameshift variant was pathogenic and the evidence include: (1) very strong evidence of pathogenicity (PVS1): frameshift; (2) Moderate evidence of pathogenicity (PM2): absent from controls in the general population databases; (3) Supporting evidence of pathogenicity (PP4): Patient's phenotype is highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology [7, 8]; the splicing variant was pathogenic and the evidence include: (1) very strong evidence of pathogenicity (PVS1): canonical splice site variants (− 2); (2) Strong evidence of pathogenicity (PS1): the same nucleotide in the splice consensus sequence as a known pathogenic variant; (3) Moderate evidence of pathogenicity (PM3): detected in trans with a pathogenic variant; (4)Supporting evidence of pathogenicity (PP4): Patient's phenotype is highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology [7, 8].

The variant c.8559-2A>G has been reported 10 times in the ClinVar database and published 16 times regarding to HGMD Professional 2020.4, several reports from China. The variant c.8559-2A>G in USH2A accounts for 19.1% of variants in a Chinese USH2 cohort [17, 18] and 26% in all Western Japanese USH patients. Furthermore, RT-PCR analysis from a patient has been carrying out [9]. Bioinformatic analysis predicted that the variant c.8559-2A>G would cause shearing abnormality, resulting in the skipping of exon 43 during transcription [2, 16, 19]. These results suggested that c.8559-2A>G may be one of the hot spot variants of the USH2A gene in Asian populations. Hence, variant screening for c.8559-2A>G in USH2A may prove very effective for the early diagnosis of USH2.

At present, the main abnormal phenotypes of USH are RP and sensorineural deafness. Despite the lack of cure for USH, cochlear implants can help improve the hearing functions of USH2 patients. Moreover, cochlear implants and sensory prosthesis implantation can improve the symptoms of hearing loss or retinal degeneration [2, 13]. At present, although there is no effective cure for human USH patients, virus vector and antisense oligonucleotide targeting therapies have been successfully used to treat USH in animal experiments [15].

In this report, we successfully performed genetic diagnosis of Usher syndrome by disease-targeted gene panel and have thus proven that this method can serve as a rapid, high-throughput, and efficient screening strategy. We describe a Chinese patient presenting clinical features compatible with USH2. Using a disease-targeted gene panel, we identified novel compound heterozygous variants in exons 22 and 43. The novel variant expands the spectrum of USH2A variants in USH. According to the criteria of ACMG, both variants were pathogenic. Specific DNA sequencing of the two variant sites was carried out in the fetus of the proband's mother. Subsequently, the mother of the proband gave birth to a healthy baby without any abnormal phenotype.

Availability of data and materials

The raw sequence data reported in the paper have been deposited in the Genome Sequence Archive (Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics 2017) in National Genomics Data Center (Nucleic Acid Res 2021), China National Center for Bioinformation/Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Science, under accession number HRA001084 at https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/search/?dbId=hra&q=HRA001084. For the considerations about the security of human genetic resources and the confidentiality of participant, the data is not publicly available, but can be applied from the website or obtained from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

RP:

Retinitis pigmentosa

USH:

Usher syndrome

USH1:

Usher syndrome Type I

USH2:

Usher syndrome Type II

USH3:

Usher syndrome Type III

USH2A :

Usher syndrome type 2A

gDNA:

Genomic DNA

ACMG:

The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics

DM:

Disease variant

UCSC:

The University of California Santa Cruz Genome Browser database

References

  1. 1.

    Bolz HJ, Roux AF. Clinical utility gene card for: usher syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011;19:931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Millán JM, Aller E, Jaijo T, Blanco-Kelly F, Gimenez-Pardo A, Ayuso C. An update on the genetics of usher syndrome. J Ophthalmol. 2011;66:417217.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Blanco-Kelly F, Jaijo T, Aller E, Avila-Fernandez A, López-Molina MI, Giménez A, García-Sandoval B, Millán JM, Ayuso C. Clinical aspects of usher syndrome and the USH2A gene in a cohort of 433 patients. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133:157–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Dreyer B, Tranebjaerg L, Rosenberg T, Weston MD, Kimberling WJ, Nilssen O. Identification of novel USH2A mutations: implications for the structure of USH2A protein. Eur J Hum Genet. 2000;8:500–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Pennings RJ, Te Brinke H, Weston MD, Claassen A, Orten DJ, Weekamp H, Van Aarem A, Huygen PL, Deutman AF, Hoefsloot LH, Cremers FP, Cremers CW, Kimberling WJ, Kremer H. USH2A mutation analysis in 70 Dutch families with Usher syndrome type II. Hum Mutat. 2004;24:185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Baux D, Larrieu L, Blanchet C, Hamel C, Ben Salah S, Vielle A, Gilbert-Dussardier B, Holder M, Calvas P, Philip N, Edery P, Bonneau D, Claustres M, Malcolm S, Roux AF. Molecular and in silico analyses of the full-length isoform of usherin identify new pathogenic alleles in Usher type II patients. Hum Mutat. 2007;28:781–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde M, Lyon E, Spector E, Voelkerding K, Rehm HL. ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensusrecommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Oza AM, DiStefano MT, Hemphill SE, Cushman BJ, Grant AR, Siegert RK, Shen J, Chapin A, Boczek NJ, Schimmenti LA, Murry JB, Hasadsri L, Nara K, Kenna M, Booth KT, Azaiez H, Griffith A, Avraham KB, Kremer H, Rehm HL, Amr SS, Abou Tayoun AN; ClinGen Hearing Loss Clinical Domain Working Group. Expert specification of the ACMG/AMP variant interpretation guidelines for genetic hearing loss. Hum Mutat. 2018; 39(11):1593–613.

  9. 9.

    Faucher B, Miermont F, Ranque S, Franck J, Piarroux R. Optimization of Toxoplasma gondii DNA extraction from amniotic fluid using NucliSENS easyMAG and comparison with QIAamp DNA minikit. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31:1035–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Nakanishi H, Ohtsubo M, Iwasaki S, Hotta Y, Mizuta K, Mineta H, Minoshima S. Hair roots as an mRNA source for mutation analysis of Usher syndrome-causing genes. J Hum Genet. 2010;55(10):701–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Edwards A, Fishman GA, Anderson RJ, Grover S, Derlacki DJ. Visual acuity and visual field impairment in usher syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:165–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Fishman GA, Bozbeyoglu S, Massof RW, Kimberling W. Natural course of visual field loss in patients with type 2 usher syndrome. Retina. 2007;27:601–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Keats BJ, Corey DP. The usher syndromes. Am J Med Genet. 1999;89:158–66.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Adams DR, Eng CM. Next-generation sequencing to diagnose suspected genetic disorders. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1353–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Mathur P, Yang J. Usher syndrome: hearing loss, retinal degeneration and associated abnormalities. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1852:406–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Dai H, Zhang X, Zhao X, Deng T, Dong B, Wang J, Li Y. Identification of five novel mutations in the long isoform of the USH2A gene in Chinese families with Usher syndrome type II. Mol Vis. 2008;14:2067–75.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Garcia-Garcia G, Aparisi MJ, Jaijo T, Rodrigo R, Leon AM, Avila-Fernandez A, Blanco-Kelly F, Bernal S, Navarro R, Diaz-Llopis M, Baiget M, Ayuso C, Millan JM, Aller E. mutational screening of the USH2A gene in Spanish USH patients reveals 23 novel pathogenic mutations. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011;6:65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Lenassi E, Saihan Z, Bitner-Glindzicz M, Webster AR. The effect of the common c. 2299 delG mutation in USH2A on RNA splicing. Exp Eye Res. 2014;122:9–12.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wang L, Zhang J, Chen N, Wang L, Zhang F, Ma Z, Li G, Yang L. Application of whole exome and targeted panel sequencing in the clinical molecular diagnosis of 319 Chinese families with inherited retinal dystrophy and comparison study. Genes. 2018;9(7):19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by The National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC1002200) and The Program of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province (No.2020YFS0095).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CZ, SL and JW designed the study. CZ, YX and HX performed the experiments. CZ and JW conducted data analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shanling Liu or Jing Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Written informed consent was obtained from the parents, who agreed to join this study.

Consent for publication

The patient’s parents provided the written consent for the case report to be published. Informed consent from parents regarding data and clinical details for publication has been obtained.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1. Table S1

: 162 genes of the hearing loss-targeted gene panels.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, C., Xiao, Y., Xie, H. et al. A novel USH2A variant in a patient with hearing loss and prenatal diagnosis of a familial fetus: a case report. BMC Med Genomics 14, 200 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-021-01052-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Hearing loss
  • USH2A
  • Variant
  • Disease-targeted gene panel
  • Next generation sequencing
  • Prenatal diagnosis