Skip to main content
Download PDF

Prognostic signature for hepatocellular carcinoma based on 4 pyroptosis-related genes

BMC Medical Genomics volume 15, Article number: 166 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a cancer with a poor prognosis. Many recent studies have suggested that pyroptosis is important in tumour progression. However, the role of pyroptosis-related genes (PRGs) in HCC remains unclear.

Materials and methods

We identified differentially expressed PRGs in tumours versus normal tissues. Through univariate, LASSO, and multivariate Cox regression analyses, a prognostic PRG signature was established. The signature effectiveness was evaluated by time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (t-ROC) curve and Kaplan–Meier (KM) survival analysis. The signature was validated in the ICGC (LIRI-JP) cohort. In addition, single-sample gene enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) showed the infiltration of major immune cell types and the activity of common immune pathways in different subgroups.

Results

Twenty-nine pyroptosis-related DEGs from The Cancer Genome Atlas-Liver Hepatocellular Carcinoma (TCGA-LIHC) dataset were detected, and four genes (CTSV, CXCL8, MKI67 and PRF1) among them were selected to construct a prognostic signature. Then, the patients were divided into high- and low-risk groups. The pyroptosis-related signature was significantly associated with overall survival (OS). In addition, the patients in the high-risk group had lower levels of immune infiltration.

Conclusion

The prognostic signature for HCC based on 4 pyroptosis-related genes has reliable prognostic and predictive value for HCC patients.

Peer Review reports

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers, and its outlook is very poor. Worldwide, it is a leading cancer type in 11 countries and regions and is the third leading cause of cancer-related death in 23 countries after lung cancer and colorectal cancer. According to GLOBCAN 2020, 830,180 new deaths from HCC occur every year [1].In most patients, surgery is only an option for those in the early stages of liver cancer (less than stage IIIB and Child–Pugh stage A) [2]. Patients with advanced liver cancer often take conservative treatments and have a poor prognosis. However, the early clinical manifestations of HCC are often atypical, and it is difficult to diagnose HCC only from the clinical manifestations. AFP is a common serum molecular marker used to diagnose liver cancer. However, normal AFP levels may be present in approximately 30% of patients with HCC [3]. Accordingly, the establishment of a multigene classifier to predict HCC outcomes is important. Such a classifier could have important reference value for predicting the survival and treatment outcomes of patients with liver cancer.

Pyroptosis is a form of regulated cell death (RCD), and the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death recommended that it be recognized as a type of RCD that critically depends on the formation of plasma membrane pores by members of the gasdermin (GSDM) protein family, often (but not always) as a consequence of inflammatory caspase activation [4]. GSDM pores formed in the plasma membrane eventually lead to cell lysis, and a large number of damage-related molecular patterns (DAMPs), such as ATP, IL-1β, and HMGB1, are released at different times and stages [5], resulting in inflammation. Studies have shown that certain inflammatory factors, such as IL-1β, play a role in promoting tumour invasion. Solid tumours that have been shown to upregulate IL-1β include breast, colon, lung, and head and neck cancers and melanoma, and patients with these IL-1β-upregulated tumours generally show a poor prognosis [6]. In many tumours, IL-1β may increase tumour cell metastasis by promoting angiogenesis [7, 8]. However, IL-1β has also been shown to inhibit cancer. Haabeth et al. demonstrated that IL-1β can drive tumour-specific Th1 response activation to inhibit the progression of B-cell myeloma and lymphoma [9, 10]. However, there are few studies on pyroptosis in HCC.

Here, we conducted a systematic study of pyroptosis-related genes (PRGs) in HCC to determine differences in the expression of these genes between tumour patients and nontumour patients, to assess the correlation between their expression and patient prognosis and to study the effects of these PRGs on the tumour-immune microenvironment.

Materials and methods

Data collection

The mRNA expression profiles (mRNA-seq) and corresponding clinical data of patients were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. We downloaded TCGA-liver hepatocellular cancer (LIHC) sample information after log2 (FPKM + 1) processing from the Xena platform (https://xena.ucsc.edu/) [11]. Our inclusion criteria for patients were as follows: histologically diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma [12]; available expression profiles; patients with survival information. Consequently, we extracted 267 tumour samples from the TCGA dataset for subsequent analysis (Table 1). Under the same criteria, 240 primary tumour solid tissue samples (Table 2) were included as the external validation dataset from the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC), and 184 PRGs were retrieved from the GeneCards database (25th August 2021. https://www.genecards.org/) with the keyword “pyroptosis”. The above three databases are publicly available and accessible.

Table 1 Clinicopathologic characteristics of HCC patients in TCGA database
Full size table
Table 2 Clinicopathologic characteristics of HCC patients in ICGC database
Full size table

Consensus clustering (CC) analysis

Unsupervised class discovery is a highly useful technique in cancer research, where intrinsic groups sharing biological characteristics may exist but are unknown. The CC method provides quantitative and visual stability evidence for estimating the number of unsupervised classes in a dataset [13]. We used the “ConsensusClusterPlus” R package (version 1.52.0) to duplicate tumour samples in TCGA 1000 times to find the optimal classification cluster of tumour samples, and approximately 80% of the samples were selected in each iteration.

Search for differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the TCGA-LIHC dataset

We used the empirical Bayesian approach of the “limma” R package (version 3.44.3) to obtain DEGs [14]. DEGs with |log2-fold change (FC)|≥ 1 and adj P-value (FDR) < 0.05 were used for subsequent analysis.

Construction of the prognostic PRG signature

Univariate Cox regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox regression and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify the genes associated with pyroptosis and establish a prognostic PRG signature for HCC. In the univariate Cox regression analysis, P < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance, indicating that the gene is associated with overall survival (OS). The LASSO Cox regression model was then utilized to narrow down the candidate genes by using tenfold cross validation via the “glmnet” R package [15]. Then, we carried out multivariate Cox regression analysis and established the risk scoring equation according to the standardized regression coefficients of the factors.

$${\text{Risk Score}} = \Sigma {\text{i}}({\text{Coefi}} \cdot {\text{Expi}})$$

To evaluate the predictive ability of the prognostic PRG signature, we used the median risk score to divide the sample into high- and low-risk groups. Kaplan–Meier (KM) survival curves were drawn with the "survival" R package (version 3.2-13), and the P value was calculated. In addition, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (t-ROC) curve analyses were performed to determine how accurately the signature predicted patient survival at six months, one year, two years, and three years [16]. The risk curve was also used to verify the relationship between the risk score and patient survival status. Principal component analysis (PCA) integrated the risk score and patient survival information through dimensionality reduction and presented relevant information in a low-dimensional manner, which could verify the signature's ability to distinguish between high- and low-risk groups [17]. In addition, we performed a similar process with data from the ICGC database, and the prognostic PRG signature was further validated in this independent cohort.

Validation of prognostic genes in an external database

The mRNA expression levels of four marker genes were verified with the Tumour Immune Estimation Resource (TIMER) database (https://cistrome.shinyapps.io/timer/). In addition, we used the cBioPortal database (https://www.cbioportal.org/) to investigate the genetic alterations of the related genes. The above two databases are publicly available and accessible.

Construction of the nomogram and evaluation of its predictive value

The expression levels of the four marker genes in the risk scoring equation were included in the nomogram to assess the 1-year, 2-year and 3-year survival rates of the patients, and calibration curves were drawn to assess the prognostic performance of the nomogram.

Validation of the independence of the risk scores from other clinical variables

The clinical information, including sex, age, tumour grade, tumour stage and risk scores, of patients providing the samples was included in the univariate Cox regression analysis, and bilateral P values < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. The clinical features were also incorporated into the multivariate Cox regression analysis to determine whether the prognostic model prediction ability was independent of the conventional clinical features. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

Gene enrichment analysis

We next investigated the biological processes involving the DEGs between the high- and low-risk patient groups. DEGs with P < 0.05 and absolute value of log2 FC > 1 were selected for enrichment analysis. For the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) [18,19,20] and gene ontology (GO) analyses, P < 0.05 and false discovery rate (q) < 1 were considered indicators of statistical significance.

Immune infiltration analysis

The "GSVA" package (version 1.32.3) was used to calculate the immune score of the samples, explore the infiltration of 16 major immune cell types and investigate the activity of 13 common immune pathways in different subgroups in the high- and low-risk groups.

Statistical analysis

Single-factor analysis of variance was applied to compare the gene expression of 184 PRGs between the normal and HCC tissues. Independent prognostic factors were identified by univariate and multivariate Cox regression. Differences in OS between high- and low-risk groups were assessed using Kaplan–Meier analysis and two-sided log-rank test. When comparing the immune cell infiltration and immune pathway activation between the two groups, the Mann–Whitney test was used. All statistical P values are two-side and P < 0.05 represents statistical significance. Besides, R software (Version 4.0.2) was employed for all statistical data analyses. The flowchart of the whole study is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The flowchart of the whole study. Flowchart for establishing and verifying prognostic signature

Full size image

Results

CC analysis to explore patient differences

To effectively distinguish liver cancer patients by PRGs, we conducted CC analysis on all HCC patients in the TCGA cohort. The cluster variable K was increased from 2 to 10; when K = 2, the correlation within subgroups was the highest, while the correlation between groups was the lowest. However, the samples could not be well distinguished (Additional file 1: Fig. S1a). In addition, when KM survival curves were generated for the two subgroups, we found no significant difference between the two groups (Additional file 1: Fig. S1b).

Identification of differentially expressed PRGs between tumour and normal tissue

Overall, 184 genes related to pyroptosis were retrieved from the GeneCards database, and 29 differentially expressed genes with |Log2 FC|> 1 were screened by the "limma" package (Fig. 2a,b). P < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistically significant DEGs. Of the DEGs, 8 PRGs were upregulated in liver cancer tissues, and 21 PRGs were downregulated in tumour tissues.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Searching for PRGs and links between them. Volcano plot of all DEGs between HCC and normal samples. Red: upregulated DEGs; Black: nonsignificant genes; Green: downregulated DEGs (a). Overall, 29 PRGs were found in DEGs (b). PPI analysis and the correlation network were drawn to explore the relationship between 29 genes (c, d)

Full size image

To further explore the association between these PRGs, protein–protein interaction (PPI) analysis was performed, setting the minimum required interaction score at 0.4 (medium confidence). Cytoscape software (Version 3.7.2) was employed for visualization (Fig. 2c), and we found that IL1B interacts with many genes at the protein level. In addition, we mapped the correlation network containing these 29 genes and explored their relationships at the gene level (Fig. 2d).

Construction and development of a prognostic signature for HCC

Through univariate Cox regression analysis, we found 10 DEGs related to the prognosis of HCC among 29 PRGs (Fig. 3a). High expression of ANXA2, CTSV, CXCL8, IL13RA2, MKI67, TLR2 and TREM2 may promote survival, while high expression of CD14, MST1 and NLRP6 may adversely affect survival. LASSO regression analysis further narrowed ten genes down to seven (ANXA2, CTSV, CXCL8, MKI67, NLRP6, NLRP6, and PRF1) (Fig. 3b, c). Finally, we obtained 4 key prognosis-related PRGs—CTSV, CXCL8, MKI67 and PRF1—by stepwise multivariate regression analysis (Fig. 3d, e). The prognostic PRG signature was constructed as follows: risk score = (0.249* CTSV expression) + (0.137* CXCL8 expression) + (0.264* MKI67 expression) + (− 0.224* PRF1 expression). CTSV, CXCL8 and MKI67 were high-risk factors (HR > 1), and PRF1 was a protective factor (HR > 1). After calculating the risk scores of all samples, the median was used to divide the samples into two subgroups (high and low risk), with a cut-off value of 0.384. Patients in the high- and low-risk groups were well distinguished by PCA (Fig. 4a), and the high-risk score group had a higher mortality rate and shorter survival time (Fig. 4b, c). By plotting t-ROC curves, we found that risk scores also had certain significance in differentiating patients’ half-year, 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year survival (Fig. 4d). The area under the t-ROC curve (AUC) was 0.691 at 6 months, 0.725 at 1 year, 0.694 at 2 years and 0.681 at 3 years. In addition, multivariate Cox regression proved that our prognostic signature was an independent prognostic factor for HCC (Fig. 4e).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Construction and development of a prognostic signature for HCC. Univariate Cox regression was used to identify genes associated with OS (a). LASSO regression of the 10 OS-related genes (b, c). The prognostic signature was established based on multivariate Cox regression (d, e)

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Internal validation of the TCGA cohort. PCA plot for samples based on the risk scores (a). Risk score and survival status distribution of HCC samples from the TCGA database (b). KM curves of samples in the high- and low-risk groups (c). t-ROC curves demonstrated the predictive efficiency of the risk score (d). Multivariate Cox regression showed that the risk score was an independent prognostic factor in the TCGA database (e)

Full size image

External database validation of the PRG-related prognostic signature in HCC

TIMER database analysis confirmed that CTSV and MKI67 were highly expressed in tumour tissues, while CXCL8 and PRF1 were expressed at low levels in tumour tissues (Fig. 5a), which was consistent with our findings. We investigated the genetic changes in the CTSV, CXCL8, MKI67 and PRF1 genes. The mutations of these four genes in TCGA HCC samples were assessed via the cBioPortal database. MKI67 had the highest frequency of genetic alterations (3%), and missense mutation was the most common alteration (Fig. 5b).

Fig. 5
figure 5

External database validation of the PRG-related prognostic signature in HCC. Human CTSV, CXCL8, MKI67 and PRF1 levels in different tumour types from TCGA were determined using TIMER (a). The mutations of these four genes in TCGA HCC samples were assessed via the cBioPortal database (b)

Full size image

Construction of a nomogram

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that the expression of CTSV, CXCL8, MKI67 and PRF1 were independent prognostic factors in liver cancer patients. On this basis, we constructed a nomogram to predict the patient's probability of survival at one, two, and three years. The expression levels of four genes (CTSV, CXCL8, MKI67 and PRF1) were included as indicators to establish the risk score (Fig. 6a). In addition, a calibration plot was drawn and indicated that our nomogram had good predictive performance (Fig. 6b–d).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Construction and verification of a nomogram. The nomogram was built based on the expression of 4 genes in the training cohort (a). The calibration plots showed good predictive performance for OS at 1, 2, and 3 years (b–d)

Full size image

Validation of the PRG-related prognostic signature for HCC

To verify the availability of our PRG-related model, we downloaded liver cancer datasets from the ICGC database to verify the risk score equation. We used a cut-off value of 0.384 for the training set to divide the ICGC database samples into high- and low-risk subgroups. Consistent with the results from the TCGA database, patients in the high- and low-risk groups could still be distinguished by PCA (Fig. 7a). Patients with high risk scores had worse prognoses (Fig. 7b), and the OS of high-risk patients was significantly reduced compared with that of low-risk patients (P = 6.501e−03) (Fig. 7c). The AUCs of the prognostic signature at six months, one year, two years and three years were 0.673, 0.731, 0.681 and 0.705, respectively (Fig. 7d). Multivariate Cox regression proved that the prognostic signature was an independent prognostic factor for HCC (Fig. 7e). All of the above evidence indicates that PRGs are of certain clinical value in our prognostic signature of HCC.

Fig. 7
figure 7

External validation of the ICGC cohort. PCA was performed by dividing HCC samples in the ICGC database into high- and low-risk groups using the cut-off values in TCGA (a). Samples with a high risk score in ICGC HCC samples had a worse prognosis (b, c). The t-ROC curve verifies the accuracy of the prognostic signature (d). Multivariate Cox regression showed that the risk score was an independent prognostic factor in the ICGC database (e)

Full size image

Gene enrichment analysis

To further explore the differences in gene function and pathways between the high- and low-risk subgroups, the "limma" package was used to identify DEGs between the two subgroups of TCGA patients. The differential criteria were an absolute value of log FC > 1 and P < 0.05. In total, 45 genes related to the risk score were found. Of these, 43 genes were upregulated in the high-risk group, and 2 were downregulated. Then, KEGG and GO enrichment analysis was conducted on these genes (Fig. 8a, b), and the results showed that most of the high risk-related pathways were cell cycle, cell metabolism and immune-related pathways.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Functional analysis based on the DEGs between the two risk groups in the TCGA cohort. GO enrichment analysis, including biological process analysis, cellular component analysis and molecular function (a). KEGG pathway analysis (b)

Full size image

Analysis of the immune microenvironment in patient subgroups

To explore the differences in immune infiltration and the activity of immune-related pathways in high- to low-risk subgroups, single-sample gene enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) was used to calculate the immune score of 16 kinds of immune cells in each sample. The results showed that the high-risk group usually had a lower level of immune infiltration. In particular, B cells, CD8 + T cells, macrophages, mast cells, neutrophils, NK cells, pDCs (plasmacytoid dendritic cells), T helper cells, and TILs (tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes) (Fig. 9a) were found at lower levels in this group. The activity of immune-related pathways was also generally downregulated in the high-risk group (Fig. 9b).

Fig. 9
figure 9

Analysis of the immune microenvironment in patient subgroups. Comparison of the enrichment scores of 16 types of immune cells and 13 immune-related pathways between the low- and high-risk groups in the TCGA cohort

Full size image

Discussion

HCC is a serious health hazard worldwide. Some studies have shown that pyroptosis plays an important role in the occurrence and development of tumours [21, 22], but the role of PRGs in liver cancer remains unclear. In this study, we first assessed 29 PRGs that were differentially expressed in tumour and normal samples and conducted PPI network and correlation analysis to explore the associations of these genes in HCC. To further explore the prognostic value of these PRGs, we established a risk profile of four genes by univariate Cox regression, LASSO-Cox regression, and multivariate Cox regression analyses, and the risk score equation was verified to be clinically significant in the ICGC database. A nomogram was constructed to estimate the patient's one-, two-, and three-year survival probability. Enrichment analysis showed that the DEGs between the high- and low-risk groups were involved in immune-related pathways. We conducted ssGSEA and found that the level of immune infiltration and the activity of related pathways were decreased significantly in the high-risk group.

Among the four key PRGs obtained, cathepsin V (CTSV) promotes the proliferation and invasion of tumour cells in breast cancer [23] and colorectal cancer [24], but its role in liver cancer is unclear. CXCL8/IL-8 is a well-known chemokine that mediates cancer cell motility, invasion and metastasis by promoting epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) [25] while its role in HCC has been little explored. IL-8 has been found to increase cancer proliferation in vitro [26]. In HCC, the IL-8 gene expression can be regulated by transcriptional activation of NF-κB, activation of the ERK, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and PI3K pathway [27]. Furthermore, NF-κB activation has been proven to be related to gasdermin D which is the executor of pyroptosis [28]. In Zhao et al.'s study [29], MKI67 was confirmed to be related to the prognosis of liver cancer. Upregulation of MKI67 elevates the degree of immune infiltration of many immune cell subtypes within LIHC, including functional T cells, CD4 + T cells, and CD8 + T cells [30]. However, the molecular mechanism of its involvement in pyrotopia in hepatocellular carcinoma is still unclear. Perforin, a pore-forming protein encoded by the PRF1 gene [31] and plays a crucial role in the killer cell-mediated elimination of virally infected host cells, tumour cells [32]. Perforin plays a dominant role in the CD8 + T cell-mediated lysis of HCV-replicating human hepatoma cells [33]. At the same time, in HBV-specific hepatocellular carcinoma, perforin also plays a certain cytotoxic role [34]. Our results indicate that these four key genes are independent factors affecting the prognosis of HCC, and the signature including all these genes has good predictive performance in terms of prognosis and recurrence.

There are some shortcomings in our present study. Our signature should be validated further by performing clinical trials to better evaluate the relationship between the risk-score and pyroptosis in HCC. Besides, specific molecular mechanisms of 4 PRGs in our signature needs further examination.

In conclusion, our study suggests that the prognosis of HCC is closely related to pyroptosis. We constructed a promising PRG prognostic model to predict the prognosis of HCC patients. It will be a helpful reference for clinical and treatment decision-making. At present, there are few studies on pyroptosis, especially its mechanism in HCC. The four genes in the signature may play an important role in pyroptosis in HCC. Our study preliminarily confirmed the prognostic value of these PRGs in HCC.

Conclusion

In summary, we identified pyroptosis-related DEGs between HCC and normal tissues and provided a signature to evaluate the prognosis of HCC based on pyroptosis-related genes.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analysed in this research were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/repository), the UCSC Xena platform (https://xenabrowser.net/) and the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC, https://dcc.icgc.org/releases/current/Projects/LIRI-JP).

Abbreviations

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

RCD:

Pyroptosis is a form of regulated cell death

PRG:

Pyroptosis-related genes

mRNA-seq:

MRNA expression profiles

TCGA:

The Cancer Genome Atlas

ICGC:

International Cancer Genome Consortium

CC:

Consensus clustering

DEG:

Differentially expressed gene

LASSO:

Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator

OS:

Overall survival

KM:

Kaplan–Meier

t-ROC:

Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic

PCA:

Principal component analysis

TIMER:

Tumour Immune Estimation Resource

HR:

Hazard ratio

AUC:

Area under the ROC curve

CI:

Confidence interval

KEGG:

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

GO:

Gene ontology

PPI:

Protein-protein interaction

ssGSEA:

Single-sample gene enrichment analysis

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Recio-Boiles A, Babiker HM: Liver Cancer. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. Copyright © 2021, StatPearls Publishing LLC.; 2021.

  3. Marengo A, Rosso C, Bugianesi E. Liver cancer: connections with obesity, fatty liver, and cirrhosis. Annu Rev Med. 2016;67:103–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Galluzzi L, Vitale I, Aaronson SA, Abrams JM, Adam D, Agostinis P, Alnemri ES, Altucci L, Amelio I, Andrews DW, et al. Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25(3):486–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsuchiya K. Switching from apoptosis to pyroptosis: gasdermin-elicited inflammation and antitumor immunity. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(1):426.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Apte RN, Krelin Y, Song X, Dotan S, Recih E, Elkabets M, Carmi Y, Dvorkin T, White RM, Gayvoronsky L, et al. Effects of micro-environment- and malignant cell-derived interleukin-1 in carcinogenesis, tumour invasiveness and tumour-host interactions. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(6):751–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nakao S, Kuwano T, Tsutsumi-Miyahara C, Ueda S-i, Kimura YN, Hamano S, Sonoda K-h, Saijo Y, Nukiwa T, Strieter RM, et al. Infiltration of COX-2-expressing macrophages is a prerequisite for IL-1 beta-induced neovascularization and tumor growth. J Clin Invest. 2005;115(11):2979–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Saijo Y, Tanaka M, Miki M, Usui K, Suzuki T, Maemondo M, Hong X, Tazawa R, Kikuchi T, Matsushima K, et al. Proinflammatory cytokine IL-1 beta promotes tumor growth of Lewis lung carcinoma by induction of angiogenic factors: in vivo analysis of tumor-stromal interaction. J Immunol. 2002;169(1):469–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Haabeth OAW, Lorvik KB, Hammarström C, Donaldson IM, Haraldsen G, Bogen B, Corthay A. Inflammation driven by tumour-specific Th1 cells protects against B-cell cancer. Nat Commun. 2011;2:240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Haabeth OAW, Lorvik KB, Yagita H, Bogen B, Corthay A. Interleukin-1 is required for cancer eradication mediated by tumor-specific Th1 cells. Oncoimmunology. 2016;5(1): e1039763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldman MJ, Craft B, Hastie M, Repečka K, McDade F, Kamath A, Banerjee A, Luo Y, Rogers D, Brooks AN, et al. Visualizing and interpreting cancer genomics data via the Xena platform. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38(6):675–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kalinski T, Roessner A. Hepatocellular carcinoma: pathology and liver biopsy. Dig Dis. 2009;27(2):102–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wilkerson MD, Hayes DN. ConsensusClusterPlus: a class discovery tool with confidence assessments and item tracking. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(12):1572–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law CW, Shi W, Smyth GK. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(7): e47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tibshirani R. The lasso method for variable selection in the Cox model. Stat Med. 1997;16(4):385–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu H, Pan R, Qi Y, Zheng Z, Li J, Li H, Ying J, Xu M, Duan S. LEPR hypomethylation is significantly associated with gastric cancer in males. Exp Mol Pathol. 2020;116: 104493.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jolliffe IT, Cadima J. Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2016;374(2065):20150202.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):27–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kanehisa M. Toward understanding the origin and evolution of cellular organisms. Protein Sci. 2019;28(11):1947–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kanehisa M, Furumichi M, Sato Y, Ishiguro-Watanabe M, Tanabe M. KEGG: integrating viruses and cellular organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(D1):D545–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Xia X, Wang X, Cheng Z, Qin W, Lei L, Jiang J, Hu J. The role of pyroptosis in cancer: pro-cancer or pro-"host"? Cell Death Dis. 2019;10(9):650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Xia S, Kong Q, Li S, Liu X, Junqueira C, Meza-Sosa KF, Mok TMY, Ansara J, et al. Gasdermin E suppresses tumour growth by activating anti-tumour immunity. Nature. 2020;579(7799):415–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sereesongsaeng N, McDowell SH, Burrows JF, Scott CJ, Burden RE. Cathepsin V suppresses GATA3 protein expression in luminal A breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2020;22(1):139.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang C-H, Wang L-K, Wu C-C, Chen M-L, Kuo C-Y, Shyu R-Y, Tsai F-M. Cathepsin V mediates the tazarotene-induced gene 1-induced reduction in invasion in colorectal cancer cells. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2020;78(4):483–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fernando RI, Castillo MD, Litzinger M, Hamilton DH, Palena C. IL-8 signaling plays a critical role in the epithelial-mesenchymal transition of human carcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 2011;71(15):5296–306.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Khazali AS, Clark AM, Wells A. Inflammatory cytokine IL-8/CXCL8 promotes tumour escape from hepatocyte-induced dormancy. Br J Cancer. 2018;118(4):566–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang Y, Wang W, Wang L, Wang X, Xia J. Regulatory mechanisms of interleukin-8 production induced by tumour necrosis factor-α in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. J Cell Mol Med. 2012;16(3):496–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Xu B, Jiang M, Chu Y, Wang W, Chen D, Li X, Zhang Z, Zhang D, Fan D, Nie Y, et al. Gasdermin D plays a key role as a pyroptosis executor of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in humans and mice. J Hepatol. 2018;68(4):773–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yao Z, Dong Y, Wu G, Zhang Q, Yang D, Yu J-H, Wang W-P. Preoperative diagnosis and prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma: radiomics analysis based on multi-modal ultrasound images. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wu S-Y, Liao P, Yan L-Y, Zhao Q-Y, Xie Z-Y, Dong J, Sun H-T. Correlation of MKI67 with prognosis, immune infiltration, and T cell exhaustion in hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Gastroenterol. 2021;21(1):416.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu X, Lieberman J. Knocking ’em dead: pore-forming proteins in immune defense. Annu Rev Immunol. 2020;38:455–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Fink TM, Zimmer M, Weitz S, Tschopp J, Jenne DE, Lichter P. Human perforin (PRF1) maps to 10q22, a region that is syntenic with mouse chromosome 10. Genomics. 1992;13(4):1300–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Jo J, Bengsch B, Seigel B, Rau SJ, Schmidt J, Bisse E, Aichele P, Aichele U, Joeckel L, Royer C, et al. Low perforin expression of early differentiated HCV-specific CD8+ T cells limits their hepatotoxic potential. J Hepatol. 2012;57(1):9–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhao L, Jin Y, Yang C, Li C. HBV-specific CD8 T cells present higher TNF-α expression but lower cytotoxicity in hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Exp Immunol. 2020;201(3):289–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge TCGA, the Xena platform and the ICGC network for providing data.

Funding

This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (20192BAB205059) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82060112).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Sainan Duan and Jianying Gao have contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China

    Sainan Duan, Cong Wang & Shuhui Lai

  2. Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China

    Jianying Gao & Libin Deng

  3. Institute of Translational Medicine, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China

    Weiming Lou

  4. The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China

    Yize Zhang, Ying Deng, Sixuan Guo & Zhangwang Li

  5. Queen Mary School of Nanchang University, 999 Xuefu Road, Nanchang, 330031, Jiangxi, China

    Feiyang Xi

  6. The Public Health College of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China

    Hui Xu

  7. College of Basic Medical, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China

    Haiyue Huang

  8. Department of Infectious Diseases and Key Laboratory of Liver Regenerative Medicine of Jiangxi Province, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China

    Yuanbin Zhong

Authors
  1. Sainan Duan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jianying Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Weiming Lou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yize Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ying Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Cong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Haiyue Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hui Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Sixuan Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Shuhui Lai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Feiyang Xi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Zhangwang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Libin Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Yuanbin Zhong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YZ and LD designed the study. SD and JG carried out the data extraction and statistical analysis. WL, YZ, YD, CW and HH drafted the manuscript. HX, SG, SL, ZL, FX modified the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Libin Deng or Yuanbin Zhong.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

CC analysis to explore patient differences.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duan, S., Gao, J., Lou, W. et al. Prognostic signature for hepatocellular carcinoma based on 4 pyroptosis-related genes. BMC Med Genomics 15, 166 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-022-01322-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-022-01322-9

Keywords

BMC Medical Genomics

ISSN: 1755-8794

Contact us