Skip to main content

Assessment of causal effects of physical activity on the risk of osteoarthritis: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study

Abstract

Background

Growing evidence supports an association between physical activity (PA) and the risk of osteoarthritis (OA), but this may be influenced by confounding and reverse causality. Therefore, we performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to reveal the causal relationship between PA and OA.

Methods

MR was performed to explore the causation of PA and OA with genetic variants as instrumental variables. The genetic variants were derived from the summary statistics of a large genome-wide association study meta-analysis based on the European population (n = 661,399), including self-reported leisure screen time (LST) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), and Arthritis Research UK Osteoarthritis Genetics Consortium cohorts (417,596, 393,873 and 403,124 for overall, hip and knee OA, respectively). The major MR analysis used in this work was the inverse variance weighted (IVW) approach, and sensitivity, pleiotropy, and heterogeneity studies were performed to evaluate the validity of the findings.

Results

IVW estimates indicated that LST had a risk effect on overall OA (odds ratio (OR) = 1.309, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.198–1.430, P = 2.330 × 10-9), hip OA (OR = 1.132, 95% CI: 1.009–1.269, P = 0.034) and knee OA (OR = 1.435. 95% CI: 1.286–1.602, P = 1.225 × 10-10). In contrast, no causal relationship was found between MVPA and OA (overall OA: OR = 0.895, 95% CI: 0.664–1.205, P = 0.465; hip OA: OR = 1.189, 95% CI: 0.792–1.786, P = 0.404; knee OA: OR = 0.707, 95% CI: 0.490 -1.021, P = 0.064). In addition, we observed significant heterogeneity in instrumental variables, but no horizontal pleiotropy was detected.

Conclusions

Recent findings demonstrated a protective impact of reducing LST on OA, independent of MVPA. This provides valuable insights into the role of physical activity in OA and offers lifestyle recommendations, such as reducing recreational sedentary behaviors and promoting appropriate exercise, for individuals at risk of OA.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease caused by various factors, such as obesity, aging, and strain, which leads to degenerative damage of articular cartilage and reactive hyperplasia of joint marginal and subchondral bone [1, 2]. Studies have shown that loss of complete meniscus function due to joint instability or abnormal mechanical load can cause OA in humans [3, 4]. Although our understanding of the disease has advanced considerably [5], there is still no cure for OA [6]. Therefore, it is critical to identify modifiable risk factors and seek potential treatments to slow the progression or even prevent the disease [7], of which physical activity (PA) is one. PA is movement done by skeletal muscles that demands energy expenditure beyond a baseline level and encompasses workouts, sports, and PA conducted in everyday life, work, transportation, and recreation [8].

PA is often seen as a factor that reduces the risk of OA. A meta-analysis based on data from 17 randomized clinical trials, including 1,705 patients, showed that resistance exercise was beneficial in reducing pain, relieving stiffness, and improving physical function in patients with OA of the knee [9]. One study concluded that higher levels of PA were associated with the maintenance of physical function and encouraged PA in older adults at risk of OA [10]. However, one randomized controlled trial showed that high-intensity PA did not result in improvements in physical functioning in patients with knee OA compared to low-intensity PA [11], and another study came to a similar conclusion [12]. Additionally, a study found a significant association between reduced sedentary behavior and a subsequent decrease in functional decline in the future, independent of time spent in MVPA [13], another study reached a similar conclusion [14]. In contrast, studies have shown that non-pharmacological OA prevention is not only based on regular PA but also on reducing the amount of time spent in sedentary activities throughout the day and changing sedentary behaviors [15]. However, there is evidence that in the general adult individuals, self-reported diagnosis of knee/hip OA was not associated with low, moderate or high levels of PA [16]. Because of the inherent limitations of reverse causality and potential bias in observational studies, the role of PA in OA etiology has yet to be convincingly concluded to date.

Mendelian randomization (MR) may be used for causal inference in epidemiology [17], which employs genetic variations closely associated with exposure as the exposure device to infer the causal influence of exposure on the result from non-experimental data. Due to the fact that genetic variations are allocated randomly at the time of conception, genetic analysis technologies provide substantial benefits by removing potential sources of error and establishing a clear chain of causation. In MR Analysis, the hypothesis of a causal relationship between exposure and outcome is supported if the observed genetic variation associated with exposure is also associated with the risk of the outcome. In addition, coupled with the wide availability of published genetic associations, MR became a time and cost-effective method and contributed to its growing popularity in evaluating and screening potential causal associations [18].

In this study, we performed a two-sample MR analysis, which allows the selection of genetic variants as instruments for a risk factor (PA) in one sample and explore associations of these variants with outcomes (OA) in another sample [19, 20]. By overcoming the requirement for estimating the exposure and outcomes in the same dataset, this approach is able to explore associations in publicly available aggregated statistics from large GWAS and increase power accordingly.

Methods

Data sources

Summary statistics for PA were derived from a large genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis among 661,399 participants of European ancestry [21]. Two PA phenotypes were analyzed in this study, including self-reported leisure screen time (LST) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Activities such as swimming and jogging were classified as MVPA, while activities such as watching television, playing video games, and sitting at the computer were classified as LST. Different studies used different questionnaires to assess PA, so population-specific characteristics were defined to make optimal use of the available data. GWAS for the PA trait used an additive genetic model that was adjusted for age, age-squared, and other study-specific covariates. The standard quality control checks were conducted for GWAS data before imputation.

Summary statistics for overall OA, hip OA, and knee OA were obtained from Arthritis Research UK Osteoarthritis Genetics Consortium cohorts, which were based on 417,596 (39,427 OA cases and 378,169 controls), 393,873 (15,704 OA cases and 378,169 controls), 403,124 (24,955 OA cases and 378,169 controls) European individuals [22]. The potential confounders associated with OA, including smoking, body mass index (BMI) [23], and drinking [24] were adjusted.

Selection of instrumental variables

In the two-sample MR analysis of the present study, the MR approach we used must meet the following three assumptions [25]: (a) genetic variants must be closely linked to the exposure (PA); (b) genetic variants wouldn’t be influenced by other factors; (c) genetic variants must only be related to the risk of outcomes (OA) through exposures (PA), not through other pathways. Schematic diagram of Mendelian randomization study is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic diagram of Mendelian randomization study. This design is under the hypothesis that genetic instrumental variables are associated with exposure, but not with confounders, and the genetic instrumental variable affect outcome only through exposure. Genetic instrumental variables represent single nucleotide polymorphisms

SNPs (P < 5 × 10-8) associated with a corresponding exposure at the genome-wide significance threshold were extracted in our current study. To ensure independence among each selected SNP constituting each genetic instrument, a Linkage disequilibrium analysis of the corresponding SNPs for each instrumental variable (r2 = 0.001 and kb = 10,000 kb) was applied. Then, the PhenoScanncer GWAS database was used to assess and delete SNPs correlated to potential confounding factors (including smoking, drinking, and BMI) and outcomes.

MR analysis

The robust inverse-variance weighted (IVW) regression was adopted as the main analysis method [26], while the robust MR-Egger and weighted median methods were applied as a complement to IVW. IVW is a popular technique for MR analysis, which obtains ratio estimates by dividing SNP-outcome effects by SNP-exposure effects, where the intercept is restricted to zero. The weighted median approach was utilized to provide reliable estimates, in which the MR analysis retained its robustness when < 50% of genetic variation was invalid [27]. All analyses were completed with the help of the “TwoSampleMR” package in the R software environment (version 4.1.2). Our flow chart is shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Schematic diagram of a bidirectional MR study of LST, MVPA and OA. Abbreviations: LST, leisure screen time. MVPA, moderate to vigorous intense physical activity during leisure screen time. OA, osteoarthritis. LD, linkage disequilibrium. KOA, knee osteoarthritis. HOA, hip osteoarthritis. SNPs, single-nucleotide polymorphisms. MR, Mendelian randomization. IVW, inverse variance weighted

Sensitivity analysis

A leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was performed to test if one single SNP was responsible for a disproportionate amount of variance in the relationship [28, 29]. The MR analysis was carried out again, leaving out each SNP in turn. Subsequently, a comprehensive analysis of all SNPs was run and shown for evaluation [30]. The MR result was robust if the difference was not significant.

Pleiotropy assessment

The MR-Egger regression is an efficient method for assessing horizontal pleiotropy. It establishes a weighted linear regression between the result coefficients and the exposure coefficients, with an intercept term indicating the average pleiotropic impact. If the intercept estimate of the MR-Egger regression significantly deviated from 0 (P value for MR-Egger intercept < 0.05), the existence of horizontal pleiotropic was considered [31] and corrected by outlier removal (MR-PRESSO outlier test).

Heterogeneity assessment

The Cochran’s Q statistic was employed to assess heterogeneity between SNPs, and a p-value < 0.1 would be considered significant heterogeneity [32]. Moreover, the scatter plots were used to visually evaluate the heterogeneity of SNPs.

Results

LST and OA

The character of selected SNPs

We identified 115 independent SNPs associated with LST with a p-value of less than 5 × 10–8. All SNPs were independent in the linkage disequilibrium clusters. By searching the PhenoScanner database, we removed SNPs related to previously reported confounders. In addition, there were 116, 115, and 116 SNPs for overall OA, hip OA, and knee OA, respectively. Six palindromic genetic variants (rs10759934, rs10889189, rs13380133, rs1736523 rs6130716, and rs843090) and one SNP for an incompatible allele (rs9889540) were removed from these SNPs, respectively. As a result, 108 SNPs were eventually included in the MR and sensitivity analyses. Detailed information on these SNPs is displayed in Supplemental Tables 1, 2 and 3.

MR analysis

Inverse variance weighted estimates indicated that leisure screen time had a risk effect on overall OA (odds ratio [OR] = 1.309, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.198–1.430, P = 2.330 × 10-9), hip OA (OR = 1.132, 95% CI: 1.009–1.269, P = 0.034), and knee OA (OR = 1.435, 95% CI: 1.286–1.602, P = 1.225 × 10-10). Analyses using the MR-Egger and weighted median methods yielded similar effect estimates. Heterogeneity was noted between individual SNPs for leisure screen time and OA in the heterogeneity analysis (p < 0.05). No lateral pleiotropy was identified in the Egger intercept test (overall OA: intercept = 0.001, P = 0.849; hip OA: intercept = -0.007, P = 0.286; knee OA: intercept = 0.005, P = 0.386) (Table 1). The “leave-one-out” test indicated no outliers in these SNPs. Scatterplot and funnel plot are shown in (Fig. 3A-F).

Table 1 The causal effect of LST on overall OA, hip OA and knee OA
Fig. 3
figure 3

Scatterplot, funnel plot and leave-one-out plot of LST on OA causal effects. A-C Scatterplot for IVW, MR-Egger and WM analysis methods demonstrating the effect of LST on knee OA (A), hip OA (B), and overall OA (C); D-F Funnel plot of LST on knee OA (D), hip OA (E), and overall OA (F) to suggest evidence of substantial heterogeneity. Abbreviations: LST, leisure screen time. OA, osteoarthritis. SNPs, single-nucleotide polymorphisms. MR, Mendelian randomization. IVW, inverse variance weighted. WM, weighted median

MVPA and OA

The character of selected SNPs

We identified 16 independent SNPs related to MVPA with a p-value of less than 5 × 10-8. All SNPs were independent in the LD clustering. Through a search of the PhenoScanner database, we removed SNPs associated with previously reported confounders. In addition, the SNPs used for overall OA, hip OA, and knee OA were all 16. One palindromic genetic variant (rs11130222) was removed from these SNPs. Therefore, the final number of SNPs included in MR and sensitivity analyses was 15. Detailed information on these SNPs is listed in Supplemental Tables 4, 5 and 6.

MR analysis

It was obvious that regardless of the instrumental SNP threshold, the use of inverse variance weighting methods demonstrated no significant evidence for a causal relationship between performing MVPA and OA (overall OA: OR = 0.895, 95% CI: 0.664–1.205, P = 0.465; hip OA: OR = 1.189, 95% CI: 0.792–1.786, P = 0.404; knee OA: OR = 0.707, 95% CI: 0.490–1.021, P = 0.064. Besides, the results of the study using weighted medians and MR-Egger are consistent with those of IVW. Heterogeneity was found between individual SNPs and OA for MVPA in the heterogeneity analysis (P < 0.05). No horizontal pleiotropy was witnessed following the Egger intercept test (All p-values of MR-Egger regression > 0.05) (Table 2). The “leave-one-out” test showed no outliers in these SNPs. Scatterplot and funnel plot are shown in (Fig. 4A-F).

Table 2 The causal effect of MVPA on overall OA, hip OA and knee OA
Fig. 4
figure 4

Scatterplot, funnel plot and leave-one-out plot of MVPA on OA causal effects. A-C Scatterplot for IVW, MR-Egger and WM analysis methods demonstrating the effect of MVPA on knee OA (A), hip OA (B), and overall OA (C); D-F Funnel plot of MVPA on knee OA (D), hip OA (E), and overall OA (F) to suggest evidence of substantial heterogeneity. Abbreviations: MVPA, moderate to vigorous intense physical activity during leisure screen time. OA, osteoarthritis. SNPs, single-nucleotide polymorphisms. MR, Mendelian randomization. IVW, inverse variance weighted. WM, weighted median

Discussion

This study is the first MR analysis on the causal relationship between PA and OA. Based on the data shown in the results, we found that reducing LST had a protective effect against OA, which is largely consistent with the findings of most prevenient observational studies [33,34,35]. Although its odds ratio (OR) value is relatively small, which means the effect of LST on OA is relatively small, it still provides a promising approach for preventing OA.

A large number of observational studies have documented an association between PA and OA. Among patients with knee or hip OA, regular PA is beneficial in maintaining physical function and reducing pain symptoms. Specifically, a cohort study with 12,796 participants has demonstrated that sustained long-term pain relief is confirmed with supervised exercise therapy in knee OA patients, regardless of the initial level of PA [36]. Notably, persistent physical inactivity and sedentary behavior are generally associated with the developing risk of functional limitation in adults with knee OA independent of sedentary category [33], with a similar result also found in another study [35]. However, some studies have come to the opposite conclusion. Sixty-nine studies from 23 countries have shown that multiple activities, including lifting weights and whole-body vibration, increase the risk of developing OA in men and women [37]. Besides, including 6 global, community-based cohort studies, an international meta-analysis of individual participant-level data has suggested that physiologic energy expenditure during recreational activities and time spent in PA are not related to the risk of OA. Compared with large-scale prospective clinical trials requiring long-term observation, the MR analysis offers an efficient way to explore the causality between PA and the risk of OA [38]. Using the MR approach, our study confirmed that reducing LST would have a beneficial effect on OA. Therefore, the incidence of OA can be reduced by promoting lifestyle management, such as reducing recreational sedentary activities and encouraging appropriate exercise.

One possible explanation is that PA could function by inducing the expression and release of irisin in muscle tissue [39, 40]. On the one hand, the irisin-integrin-wnt/β-catenin-Runx2 regulatory axis may form a signaling axis [41,42,43], regulating the differentiation and proliferation of osteoblasts. On the other hand, irisin can inhibit the apoptosis of chondrocytes by reducing inflammatory factors and matrix metalloproteinases in chondrocytes [44, 45], thereby exerting a protective effect on OA [46]. Besides, PA can function as an underlying immunomodulatory therapy. PA leads in dramatically increased T-regulatory cells, reduced immunoglobulin production, and alterations in the Th1/Th2 ratio, and has been proven to attenuate inflammatory events in patients and animal models of inflammatory disorders [47, 48]. As recently reported, the considerable improvement in function and pain following physical exercise intervention in overweight adults with knee OA is partially modulated by alterations in a mix of inflammatory markers, including IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1sR, and CRP [49]. These observational studies implied that PA might affect the pathogenesis of OA through modulation of inflammation.

The current study had several main advantages. Firstly, by assigning randomly allocated alleles to offspring and essentially immobilizing them at conception, MR results are less susceptible to confounding and reverse causal measurement errors than traditional observational studies. Secondly, our study utilized large-scale GWAS datasets from two distinct European populations to reduce the effects of population stratification and increase statistical power for identifying a causal inference. Thirdly, multiple sensitivity analyses revealed no pleiotropy, further confirming the robustness of our results.

Nonetheless, there were several limitations worth mentioning in our study. Firstly, since the PA was ascertained by self-report, this was prone to recall and response bias. Secondly, given that our findings were mainly limited to participants of European ancestry, our conclusions may not be suitable for generalization to other kinds of populations. Thirdly, our MR analysis only yielded genetic evidence. Further larger or multi-ethnicity studies or prospective clinical trials should be conducted to validate our findings in the future, explore the underlying mechanisms of this possible causality and further explore related mechanisms. Lastly, our data had not demonstrated a causal relationship between MVPA and OA, so we should interpret the results cautiously.

Conclusions

Our two-sample MR study suggested reducing LST could reduce the risk of OA, independently of MVPA. This research has the potential to shed new light on the association between PA and OA risk and to suggest potential lifestyle adjustments, such as reducing recreational sedentary activities and encouraging proper exercise, for those who are predisposed to developing OA.

Availability of data and materials

GWAS summary statistics about physical activity are available in the GWAS Catalog (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/downloads/summary-statistics) using accession numbers GCST90104341 and GCST90104339. And we also could download GWAS summary statistics of overall OA, hip OA, and knee OA from the publicly available IEU GWAS database (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/datasets/ebi-a-GCST007092/, https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/datasets/ebi-a-GCST007091/, https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/datasets/ebi-a-GCST007090/).

References

  1. Litwic A, Edwards MH, Dennison EM, Cooper C. Epidemiology and burden of osteoarthritis. Br Med Bull. 2013;105:185–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Das SK, Farooqi A. Osteoarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2008;22:657–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hunter DJ, Zhang YQ, Niu JB, Tu X, Amin S, Clancy M, et al. The association of meniscal pathologic changes with cartilage loss in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:795–801.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ding C, Martel-Pelletier J, Pelletier JP, Abram F, Raynauld JP, Cicuttini F, et al. Meniscal tear as an osteoarthritis risk factor in a largely non-osteoarthritic cohort: a cross-sectional study. J Rheumatol. 2007;34:776–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Xia B, Di C, Zhang J, Hu S, Jin H, Tong P. Osteoarthritis pathogenesis: a review of molecular mechanisms. Calcif Tissue Int. 2014;95:495–505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Abramoff B, Caldera FE. Osteoarthritis: pathology, diagnosis, and treatment options. Med Clin North Am. 2020;104:293–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bijlsma JW, Knahr K. Strategies for the prevention and management of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007;21:59–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rausch Osthoff AK, Niedermann K, Braun J, Adams J, Brodin N, Dagfinrud H, et al. 2018 EULAR recommendations for physical activity in people with inflammatory arthritis and osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:1251–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Li Y, Su Y, Chen S, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Liu C, et al. The effects of resistance exercise in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30:947–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Batsis JA, Germain CM, Vásquez E, Zbehlik AJ, Bartels SJ. Physical activity predicts higher physical function in older adults: the osteoarthritis initiative. J Phys Act Health. 2016;13:6–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. de Zwart AH, Dekker J, Roorda LD, van der Esch M, Lips P, van Schoor NM, et al. High-intensity versus low-intensity resistance training in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2022;36:952–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Regnaux JP, Lefevre-Colau MM, Trinquart L, Nguyen C, Boutron I, Brosseau L, et al. High-intensity versus low-intensity physical activity or exercise in people with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015:Cd010203.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Semanik PA, Lee J, Song J, Chang RW, Sohn MW, Ehrlich-Jones LS, et al. Accelerometer-monitored sedentary behavior and observed physical function loss. Am J Public Health. 2015;105:560–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Qin J, Barbour KE, Nevitt MC, Helmick CG, Hootman JM, Murphy LB, et al. Objectively measured physical activity and risk of knee osteoarthritis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50:277–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Fouquet B, Jaume-Guichard P. Physical activities, sedentariness, comorbidities and osteoarthritis. Rev Rhum Monograph. 2021;88:194–202.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lefèvre-Colau MM, Nguyen C, Haddad R, Delamarche P, Paris G, Palazzo C, et al. Is physical activity, practiced as recommended for health benefit, a risk factor for osteoarthritis? Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2016;59:196–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lawlor DA, Harbord RM, Sterne JA, Timpson N, Davey SG. Mendelian randomization: using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology. Stat Med. 2008;27:1133–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sekula P, Del Greco MF, Pattaro C, Köttgen A. Mendelian randomization as an approach to assess causality using observational data. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27:3253–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Davey Smith G, Hemani G. Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23:R89-98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Burgess S, Scott RA, Timpson NJ, Davey Smith G, Thompson SG. Using published data in Mendelian randomization: a blueprint for efficient identification of causal risk factors. Eur J Epidemiol. 2015;30:543–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang Z, Emmerich A, Pillon NJ, Moore T, Hemerich D, Cornelis MC, et al. Genome-wide association analyses of physical activity and sedentary behavior provide insights into underlying mechanisms and roles in disease prevention. Nat Genet. 2022;54:1332–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Tachmazidou I, Hatzikotoulas K, Southam L, Esparza-Gordillo J, Haberland V, Zheng J, et al. Identification of new therapeutic targets for osteoarthritis through genome-wide analyses of UK Biobank data. Nat Genet. 2019;51:230–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Messier SP, Loeser RF, Miller GD, Morgan TM, Rejeski WJ, Sevick MA, et al. Exercise and dietary weight loss in overweight and obese older adults with knee osteoarthritis: the arthritis, diet, and activity promotion trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:1501–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gwinnutt JM, Wieczorek M, Balanescu A, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Boonen A, Cavalli G, et al. 2021 EULAR recommendations regarding lifestyle behaviours and work participation to prevent progression of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;82:48–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Labrecque J, Swanson SA. Understanding the assumptions underlying instrumental variable analyses: a brief review of falsification strategies and related tools. Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2018;5:214–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Burgess S, Davey Smith G, Davies NM, Dudbridge F, Gill D, Glymour MM, et al. Guidelines for performing Mendelian randomization investigations. Wellcome Open Res. 2019;4:186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Haycock PC, Burgess S. Consistent estimation in Mendelian randomization with some invalid instruments using a weighted Median estimator. Genet Epidemiol. 2016;40:304–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Burgess S, Foley CN, Zuber V. Inferring causal relationships between risk factors and outcomes from genome-wide association study data. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2018;19:303–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang J. Mendelian randomization study implies causal linkage between telomere length and juvenile idiopathic arthritis in a European population. J Inflamm Res. 2022;15:977–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Mokry LE, Ross S, Timpson NJ, Sawcer S, Davey Smith G, Richards JB. Obesity and multiple sclerosis: a Mendelian randomization study. PLoS Med. 2016;13:e1002053.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Burgess S, Thompson SG. Interpreting findings from Mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method. Eur J Epidemiol. 2017;32:377–89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Shu MJ, Li JR, Zhu YC, Shen H. Migraine and ischemic stroke: a Mendelian randomization study. Neurol Ther. 2022;11:237–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Master H, Thoma LM, Dunlop DD, Christiansen MB, Voinier D, White DK. Joint association of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity and sedentary behavior with incident functional limitation: data from the osteoarthritis initiative. J Rheumatol. 2021;48:1458–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Musumeci G, Aiello FC, Szychlinska MA, Di Rosa M, Castrogiovanni P, Mobasheri A. Osteoarthritis in the XXIst century: risk factors and behaviours that influence disease onset and progression. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:6093–112.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee J, Chang RW, Ehrlich-Jones L, Kwoh CK, Nevitt M, Semanik PA, et al. Sedentary behavior and physical function: objective evidence from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015;67:366–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Skou ST, Bricca A, Roos EM. The impact of physical activity level on the short- and long-term pain relief from supervised exercise therapy and education: a study of 12,796 Danish patients with knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018;26:1474–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gignac MAM, Irvin E, Cullen K, Van Eerd D, Beaton DE, Mahood Q, et al. Men and women’s occupational activities and the risk of developing osteoarthritis of the knee, hip, or hands: a systematic review and recommendations for future research. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020;72:378–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gates LS, Perry TA, Golightly YM, Nelson AE, Callahan LF, Felson D, et al. Recreational physical activity and risk of incident knee osteoarthritis: an international meta-analysis of individual participant-level data. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022;74:612–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Belviranlı M, Okudan N. Exercise training increases cardiac, hepatic and circulating levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and irisin in young and aged rats. Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig. 2018;36:20180053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Huh JY. The role of exercise-induced myokines in regulating metabolism. Arch Pharm Res. 2018;41:14–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Du J, Zu Y, Li J, Du S, Xu Y, Zhang L, et al. Extracellular matrix stiffness dictates Wnt expression through integrin pathway. Sci Rep. 2016;6:20395.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Faienza MF, Lassandro G, Chiarito M, Valente F, Ciaccia L, Giordano P. How physical activity across the lifespan can reduce the impact of bone ageing: a literature review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:1862.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Liu L, Guo J, Chen X, Tong X, Xu J, Zou J. The role of Irisin in exercise-mediated bone health. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:668759.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Park J, Bae J, Lee J. Complex exercise improves anti-inflammatory and anabolic effects in osteoarthritis-induced sarcopenia in elderly women. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9.

  45. Vadalà G, Di Giacomo G, Ambrosio L, Cannata F, Cicione C, Papalia R, et al. Irisin recovers osteoarthritic chondrocytes in vitro. Cells. 2020;9:1478.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Ning K, Wang Z, Zhang XA. Exercise-induced modulation of myokine irisin in bone and cartilage tissue-positive effects on osteoarthritis: a narrative review. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:934406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Gleeson M, Bishop NC, Stensel DJ, Lindley MR, Mastana SS, Nimmo MA. The anti-inflammatory effects of exercise: mechanisms and implications for the prevention and treatment of disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11:607–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Krüger K, Mooren FC, Pilat C. The immunomodulatory effects of physical activity. Curr Pharm Des. 2016;22:3730–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Runhaar J, Beavers DP, Miller GD, Nicklas BJ, Loeser RF, Bierma-Zeinstra S, et al. Inflammatory cytokines mediate the effects of diet and exercise on pain and function in knee osteoarthritis independent of BMI. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019;27:1118–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81972075).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

WB was responsible for the conception and design of the study. WB and LY had full access to all the data in the study and took responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. WB did the statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. All authors were involved in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content, and all authors approved the final version to be published.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chuan Xiang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplemental Table 1.

Summary of the 108 SNPs associated with LST and knee OA. LST, leisure screen time; OA, Osteoarthritis. Supplemental Table 2. Summary of the 108 SNPs associated with LST and hip OA. LST, leisure screen time; OA, Osteoarthritis. Supplemental Table 3. Summary of the 108 SNPs associated with LST and overall OA. LST, leisure screen time; OA, Osteoarthritis. Supplemental Table 4. Summary of the 15 SNPs associated with MVPA and knee OA. MVPA, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity; OA, Osteoarthritis. Supplemental Table 5. Summary of the 15 SNPs associated with MVPA and hip OA. MVPA, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity; OA, Osteoarthritis. Supplemental Table 6. Summary of the 15 SNPs associated with MVPA and overall OA. MVPA, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity; OA, Osteoarthritis.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, B., Liu, Y., Zhang, YC. et al. Assessment of causal effects of physical activity on the risk of osteoarthritis: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study. BMC Med Genomics 16, 237 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-023-01681-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-023-01681-x

Keywords