Skip to main content
Download PDF

lncRNA TUG1 transcript levels and psychological disorders: insights into interplay of glycemic index and glycemic load

BMC Medical Genomics volume 17, Article number: 221 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

There is an association between obesity and psychological disorders such as depression, anxiety, and stress. Environmental factors and genetics play a crucial role in this regard. Several long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are involved in the pathophysiology of the nervous system. Additionally, we intend to investigate how dietary glycemic index and load relate to psychological disorders in women with obesity and overweight by identifying the possible interaction with metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT1) and taurine upregulated gene 1 (TUG1).

Methods

267 overweight or obese women between the ages of 18 and 48 were recruited for the current study. A reliable and validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) consisting of 147 items assessed food consumption, glycemic load (GL), and glycemic index (GI). Depression-Anxiety-Stress Scales (DASS-21) were used to assess mental well-being. A real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to assess transcript levels for lncRNAs MALAT1 and TUG1.

Results

In obese and overweight women, a positive correlation was found between anxiety and MALAT1 mRNA levels (P = 0.007, CC = 0.178). Age, energy intake, physical activity, total fat, income, marriage, thyroid, and BMI were adjusted, and GI and TUG1 were positively correlated on DASS-21 (β = 0.006, CI = 0.001, 0.01, P = 0.031), depression (β = 0.002, CI = 0.001, 0.004, P = 0.019), Stress (β = 0.003, CI = 0.001, 0.005, P = 0.027). The interaction of GL and TUG1 on stress was also observed (β = 0.03, CI = 0.001, 0.07, P = 0.048).

Conclusions

The lncRNA TUG1 appears to be associated with depression and stress through interaction with GI and correlated with stress by interaction with GL. To establish this concept, further research is required.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The obesity epidemic is considered a global issue with negative implications for health and economics [1], including type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer risk [2,3,4]. The traditional approach to obesity management has primarily focused on short-term weight loss, with less focus on psychological factors that affect long-term weight maintenance [5]. Obesity is often influenced by psychological factors and may be maintained as a result of them [6]. Data revealed that depression, anxiety, and stress as psychological factors are associated with obesity [7,8,9]. Beyond genetics, mental disorders can be prevented and treated with nutrition [10,11,12].

Considerable attention is paid to carbohydrate consumption. Both the quantity and quality of carbohydrates affect the glycemic responses. A high glycemic index (GI) and a high glycemic load (GL) diet increase the risk of psychiatric disorders [13, 14]. The GI compares equal amounts of carbohydrates and provides a measure of the quality rather than the quantity of carbohydrates. The GL is based on GI and predicts human blood glucose response more strongly than GI [15]. The higher the GL, the more noteworthy blood glucose increases, and the insulinogenic impact of the food is anticipated. Diets that contain high levels of Gl and GL are associated with a higher risk of depression in the long term [16, 17]. An association between greater GL and lower mental illness risk has been suggested [17].

Epigenetic mechanisms are considered well-qualified candidates to explain the link between environmental factors like diet in subsequent health outcomes such as obesity and related disorders including psychological disorders [18,19,20,21]. Glucose, one of the most important substances in the body, regulates gene expression through epigenetic alteration [22]. Transient episodes of hyperglycemia contribute to the epigenetic process [23]. As obese individuals are more likely to experience transient hyperglycemia, epigenetic alterations may facilitate the progression of metabolic complications [24].

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), as a class of non-coding RNAs have been observed to regulate gene expression and function in lots of biological processes [25]. In the brain, long noncoding RNAs are highly expressed and play a pivotal role in key neuronal functions [26]. LncRNA dysregulation can induce neurodegenerative, neurodevelopmental, and neuroimmunological disorders, primary brain tumors, and psychiatric disorders [27]. A well-known lncRNA is metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT1) also known as noncoding nuclear-enriched abundant transcript 2 (NEAT2), that regulates the neurite growth. It is found in a variety of tissues; however, is concentrated in nerve cells. MALAT1 can regulate synaptogenesis-associated gene expression. Data revealed that synaptic density is reduced when MALAT1 is knocked down [28, 29].

The lncRNA Taurine up-regulated 1 (TUG1), found to be associated with human disease, plays various physiological roles, such as regulating gene expression, transcription, post-transcription, translation, and post-translation [30]. TUG1 was found to be elevated in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) patients in comparison with healthy controls [31].

Although there is ample evidence of the close association between obesity and psychological disorders, studies on the association between lncRNAs (MALAT1 and TUG1) with psychological disorders (anxiety, depression, and stress) are scarce. Moreover, the influence of the interaction of these lncRNAs and glycemic index and load on psychological disorders has yet to be investigated. Therefore, more investigation in this area warranted these relationships. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no data were available on the interplay between lncRNAs, (MALAT1 and TUG1), and the dietary glycemic index and load related to psychological disorders. Here, we aimed to evaluate how the lncRNAs and GI and GL interaction affect psychological disorders. In this study, we examined how lncRNAs, GI, and GL interaction affect anxiety, depression, and stress as psychological disorders among overweight and obese women.

Methods and materials

Population characteristics

The cross-sectional study included 267 women aged 18 to 48 years with BMIs ranging from 25 to 39.9 kg/m². These women, selected from health centers in Tehran, Iran, were healthy but exhibited overweight and obesity. The study’s exclusion criteria covered a wide array of conditions, including acute and chronic diseases, as well as, pregnancy, lactation, and menopause. Furthermore, individuals currently using any medicine or weight-loss supplements, and having recently pursued dieting were also ineligible for participation in the study. The details of the study population are available in our previous articles [20, 21]. Before the study, participants were required to provide explicit written consent. The research plan got the approval from Tehran University of Medical Sciences Ethics Committee, following all ethical norms, under code IR.TUMS.MEDICINE.REC.1401.073.

Body composition assessment

To assess the body composition of all participants following the techniques, precautions, and guidelines set out in the manufacturer’s protocol [29], we used a bioelectrical impedance analyzer, BIA Inbody 770 Co., Seoul, Korea. Participants removed footwear, excess clothing, and metal accessories before standing on the scale and holding the BIA handles as per protocol. This ensured accurate measurements within 15 to 20 s. The bioelectrical analyzer effectively evaluated several crucial body composition components, such as weight, trunk fat, body fat mass (BFM), and visceral fat.

Anthropometric indices measurement

We used a calibrated digital scale with minimal measurement error for precise weight measurement, accurate to around 100 g. Participants wore light clothing for accuracy. Height was measured standing up with a non-elastic tape, accurate to 0.5 cm. BMI was calculated using weight (in kg) divided by height squared (in meters). Waist and hip circumferences were measured accurately with a 0.5 cm non-elastic tape, above the iliac crest and at the widest part of the hip, respectively. The waist-to-hip ratio was derived by dividing waist circumference by hip circumference. All measurements were conducted by a qualified expert to ensure precision and minimize errors.

Dietary intake assessment

A validated 147-question semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was used to assess participants’ dietary intake over the past year [32]. The questionnaire’s reliability and accuracy were confirmed in prior assessments for robust data collection on dietary habits. Participants indicated their food consumption frequency (daily, weekly, monthly, or annually), with portion size details discussed during face-to-face interviews. Participants estimated food item frequency using standardized units, converted to grams using FFQ data and a home scale guide. Energy and nutrients were accurately assessed with the NUTRITIONIST 4 food analyzer [33].

Glycemic index and load assessment

Dietary GI and GL were adjusted for total caloric intake using the residuals method. This ensures a more accurate assessment of their impact, independent of overall energy consumption [34]. Participants in the study were tested on 3–5 separate mornings after fasting overnight. On two occasions, they consumed test meals with 50 g of available carbohydrates to assess the impact of specific foods. The remaining occasions involved consuming a reference food like 50 g of glucose, 55 g of dextrose, or 50 g of white bread. After fasting blood sample collection, participants consumed the designated meal. This setup examined physiological responses to various reference foods under controlled fasting conditions. Blood samples were collected at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min after eating, and the Area Under the Curve (AUC) was calculated for each subject. This was expressed as a percentage of the mean AUC from the reference food. The average of these percentages across all subjects determined the GI of the test food. This approach compared glycemic responses to different foods against the reference, revealing their effects on blood glucose levels over time. When white bread was the reference, GI values were adjusted by multiplying them by 0.71 to align with the glucose scale (with a GI of 100). GL values were calculated by multiplying the available carbohydrate content of each food by its GI value, then further adjusted by the amount consumed. The sum of these values across all food items provided the total GL. This standardized method enabled a comprehensive comparison of glycemic responses across different foods relative to the reference food (white bread) and their impact on blood glucose levels [35].

Mental well-being assessment

As part of this study, symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress were assessed using the Depression-Anxiety-Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) questionnaire, which consists of 21 items. As developed by Lovibond and Lovibond [36], this valid and reliable questionnaire [37,38,39] consists of three self-report scales used in various populations to assess depression, anxiety, and stress. To complete the questionnaire, a person needed to specify their symptoms status. As part of the DASS-21, each subscale consisted of 7 questions, and the final score of each subscale was determined by adding the scores of each question. The questions were scored from 0 (not at all: does not apply to me at all) to 3 (very much: applies to me completely). Final scores were categorized based on established thresholds for depression (≥ 10), anxiety (≥ 8), and stress (≥ 15), enabling classification according to each mental health dimension [39].

Assessment of physical activity

The short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was used to evaluate participants’ physical activity (PA) levels. This survey collected information regarding the length and regularity of individuals’ daily activity throughout the week within the previous year. The data offered valuable insights into the weekly physical activity of each participant, which was measured in metabolic equivalent hours per week (MET-h/week) [40].

Biochemical factors assessment

A 10-ml venous blood sample was collected between 8:00 and 10:00 in the morning after fasting overnight. 5 mL of blood was collected, while the rest was divided into tubes. The tubes were stored at -21 °C for one hour, then at -80 °C for gene expression analysis. All methods for measuring biochemical parameters fasting blood glucose (FBG), triglyceride (TG) and total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein (LDL-c), high-density lipoprotein (HDL-c) cholesterol, homeostasis Model Assessment Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) can be seen in our previous articles [20, 41, 42].

Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

The details of the real-time qPCR method have been published in our previous article [21]. The primer sequences utilized to investigate the expression of MALAT1, TUG1, and 18s rRNA genes are provided in Table S1.

Statistical evaluation

The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was utilized to assess the normal distribution of the data. Descriptive analysis, including measures such as the mean and standard deviation, was employed to evaluate the general characteristics of the study participants. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) were employed to compare biochemical variables and body composition among participants, accounting for covariates that might affect results. ANCOVA adjusted for BMI, total fat, energy intake, income, age, marriage, physical activity, and thyroid diseases to enhance result precision by accounting for potential influences on outcomes. We investigated the correlation and association between MALAT1 and TUG1 and psychological disorders using Pearson correlation and linear regression tests, respectively. Additionally, we examined the interaction between GI and GL with TUG1 and MALAT1 on psychological disorders using generalized linear models, while considering various covariates. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 23 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Reported P-values were two-sided, and statistical significance was considered at a P-value less than 0.05. P-values below 0.07 were also considered of marginal significance.

Results

General characteristics of study population according to tertiles of DASS-21

Table 1 displays the baseline characteristics of research participants arranged based on DASS-21 tertiles. As indicated in Table 1, in the crude model, there was a marginally significant difference among tertiles of the DASS-21 in terms of MCP-1 (P = 0.067) and used supplements (P = 0.050). The PA (P = 0.064) of participants among tertiles of the DASS-21 became significant after confounders including age, energy intake, physical activity, total fat, income, marriage, thyroid, and BMI were adjusted. Additionally, a significant mean difference in terms of MCP-1 (P = 0.048) and supplement use (P = 0.035) was observed among tertiles of the DASS-21.

Table 1 General characteristics of the study population according to tertiles of DASS-21 in obese and overweight women (n = 267)
Full size table

Dietary intake of study population according to tertiles of DASS-21

As depicted in Table 2, the crude model showed that there was a significant mean difference among the tertiles of the DASS-21 in terms of caffeine (P = 0.001), fluoride (P = 0.002), vitamin C (P = 0.036), and marginally significant for vitamin K (P = 0.053), vegetables (P = 0.051); after the energy intake was adjusted, the mean differences in terms of caffeine (P = 0.001), fluoride (P = 0.001), and vitamin C (P = 0.035) remained significant. There were also marginally significant differences among the tertiles of the DASS-21 in terms of vitamin K (P = 0.063), vegetables (P = 0.067), pantothenic acid (P = 0.059), and vitamin B6 (P = 0.057).

Table 2 Dietary intake of study population according to tertiles of DASS-21 in obese and overweight women (n = 267)
Full size table

Long non-coding RNAs, GI, and GL of the study population according to tertiles of DASS-21

Table 3 shows the study population’s genes, GI, and GL based on DASS-21 tertiles. In both crude and adjusted models, there was no significant mean difference (P > 0.05) across tertiles of DASS-21 in terms of TUG1 and MALAT1 transcript levels, GI, and GL.

Table 3 The long non-coding RNAs, GI, and GL of the study population according to tertiles of DASS-21 in obese and overweight women (n = 267)
Full size table
Table 4A Correlation between long non-coding RNAs and psychological disorders in obese and overweight women (n = 267)
Full size table
Table 4B Association between long non-coding RNAs and psychological disorders in obese and overweight women (n = 267)
Full size table

The correlation between long non-coding RNAs and psychological disorders

The relationship between genes and psychological disorders is displayed in Table 4A. In the crude model, anxiety and MALAT1 gene expression in overweight and obese women showed a positive correlation (P = 0.007, CC = 0.178). In all other cases, no significant relationship was found between genes and psychological disorders.

The association between transcript level of long non-coding RNAs and psychological disorders

Long non-coding RNAs and the psychological disorders model were associated in Table 4B, where anxiety and MALAT1 gene expression were found to be significantly correlated in obese and overweight women (B ± SE = 0.11 ± 0.04, CI = 0.03, 0.19, P = 0.007). Neither the crude nor adjusted models showed a significant correlation between genes and other psychological interventions.

The interaction of GI and GL with the long non-coding RNAs TUG1 and MALAT1 in psychological disorders

In the context of psychological diseases, Table 5 shows the association between GI and GL and the transcript levels of TUG1 and MALAT1. There was a positive interaction between GI and TUG1 transcript levels on DASS-21 (β = 0.006, CI = 0.001, 0.01, P = 0.031), depression (β = 0.002, CI = 0.001, 0.004, P = 0.019), and stress (β = 0.003, CI = 0.001, 0.005, P = 0.027), after adjusting for age, energy intake, physical activity, total fat, income, marriage, thyroid, and BMI. Furthermore, GL and TUG1 gene expression on stress were found to positively interact (β = 0.03, CI = 0.001, 0.07, P = 0.048). In contrast, there was no discernible relationship between GI and GL and MALAT1 gene expression in terms of stress, anxiety, depression, or DASS-21.

Table 5 The interaction between GI and GL with TUG1 and MALAT1 on psychological disorders in obese and overweight women (n = 267)
Full size table

Discussion

Our findings indicate a positive association between anxiety and MALAT1 gene expression in women with obesity and overweight. Upon adjusting for potential confounders such as age, energy intake, physical activity, total fat, income, marriage, thyroid, and BMI, a notable positive interaction emerged between GI and TUG1 concerning DASS-21, depression, and stress. Additionally, a positive interaction was identified between GL and TUG1 gene expression specifically related to stress.

Ample evidence showed that lncRNAs may have important regulatory roles in depression and anxiety pathologies [27, 43]. The functional analysis of highly correlated mRNAs in microarray-based analysis of rodent hippocampal tissue revealed that the dysregulated lncRNAs play a role in a variety of biological processes and pathways. These lncRNAs appear to contribute to the modulation of rat susceptibility or resilience to stress, depression, or anxiety [44]. LncRNA down-regulation in peripheral blood samples was negatively associated with the risk of suicide in major depressive disorder (MDD) patients [45]. The anterior cingulate cortex of suicide victims showed substantial changes in the expression of many lncRNAs. The data unveiled the potential regulatory effects of these lncRNAs, influencing transcriptome dynamics involved in different depression-associated molecular processes. These processes encompassed the organization of the cytoskeleton, plasma membrane function, cell adhesion, regulation of nucleus, DNA-binding, and the modulation of dendrite morphology and development [46].

Psychological disorders data indicated a significant alteration in the expression of MALAT1. Specifically, individuals with bipolar disorder exhibited downregulation of MALAT1 in their blood compared to controls. This observation suggests the potential utility of MALAT1 as a diagnostic biomarker in the blood of individuals with bipolar disorder [29]. On the other hand, alterations in MALAT1 have been observed in Parkinson’s disease [47], and it has been observed that β-asarone by targeting and reducing MALAT1 can serve as a target for therapeutic intervention in Parkinson’s disease [48]. In alignment with the current findings, another study focusing on peripheral blood leukocytes reported no significant differences in MALAT1 levels between patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and healthy subjects [49].

There is inconsistency in the available data related the MALAT1 and obesity and related disorders [50, 51]. Human adipose-tissue stem cells (hADSCs) contain a high level of MALAT1 in their exosomes. The majority of MALAT1 lncRNA is retained by preadipocytes and adipocytes after the differentiation of hADSCs into adipocytes [52]. Moreover, MALAT1 might be a potential regulator of fat deposition; because of increased expression of MALAT1 in porcine adipose tissue, which was dependent on backfat accumulation [53].

In the current study, no discernible differences were noted in MALAT1 expression among the three tertiles of DASS-21 within the studied groups. However, a positive correlation was identified between MALAT1 expression and anxiety within the entire population.

While information on the mechanisms involving MALAT1 is limited, a study conducted on mice with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has shed some light on this aspect. The investigation revealed an upregulation of caspase-3 (CASP3) and a concurrent downregulation of MALAT1, influencing apoptosis in hippocampal neurons of autistic mice. MALAT1, predominantly located in the nucleus, was found to recruit DNA methyltransferases to the CASP3 promoter region, promoting methylation and consequently inhibiting gene expression. In vitro research suggested that the downregulation of MALAT1 led to increased cellular apoptosis through the upregulation of CASP3 and Bax, along with the downregulation of Bcl-2. These findings contribute additional evidence supporting MALAT1’s role in regulating CASP3 promoter methylation to prevent neuronal apoptosis in the hippocampal regions of mice with ASD [54]. On the other hand, Fatty acid binding protein 4 (FABP4) and lipoprotein lipase (LPL) regulatory genes are positively correlated with MALAT1 expression in fat tissue [55]. Also, MALAT1 participates in fatty acid metabolism and adipogenesis at the transcriptional level through the regulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) signaling pathway [55]. Further investigation is required to elucidate the mechanistic processes involving MALAT1 lncRNA and its impact on downstream miRNA and mRNA pathways.

A study conducted by Safari et al. on schizophrenic patients reported the downregulation of h0091 compared to healthy subjects [56]. In patients with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), there was observed up-regulation of TUG1 compared to the healthy control group [57]. There is an inhibitory effect of TUG1 on miR-9, a conserved miRNA related to animal behavioral deficits, and subsequently, this miRNA affects multiple mRNAs [58]. In another investigation, the overexpression of TUG1 dramatically reduces inflammation and improves insulin sensitivity in obesity through the downregulation of miR-204, as well as through the activation of the SIRT1/GLUT4/PPARγ/AKT pathway [59]. MALAT1 and TUG1 might play a pivotal role in obesity because the transcription levels of MALAT1 and TUG1 showed a positive correlation with major lipogenic and adipogenic genes [60]. The data on this matter is inconsistent; however, in this particular investigation, no significant differences in TUG1 were seen between the three tertiles of DASS-21 in overweight and obese women.

Dietary intake plays a pivotal role in epigenetics and psychological disorders. Data from one systematic review among cohort studies revealed a significant positive correlation between dietary GI and depression. Additionally, significant effects of high-GL diet intake on depression have been demonstrated in clinical trials [16]. Haghighatdoost et al.. reported that a higher GI diet was linked to a greater risk of depression [17]. On the other hand, data showed a greater GL was associated with a decreased risk of mental disorders, depression, and psychological distress [17]. An investigation among Iranian adults showed that higher GL diet intake was related to lower stress risk; although, no significant association was observed between GI or GL and depression and anxiety risk [61]. Also, our previous study revealed a negative correlation between quality of life and GL, but not GI, among overweight and obese women [62]. Our recent study revealed that MALAT1 positively interacted with the cholesterol/saturated fat index among overweight and obese women, which affects the visceral adiposity index and body adiposity index [21].

Our study revealed a positive interaction between GI and TUG1 gene expression on DASS-21, depression, and stress. Additionally, a positive interaction was identified between GL and TUG1 gene expression specifically related to stress. These findings contribute to a growing body of evidence highlighting the interplay between TUG1 and GI in the context of psychological disorders.

Despite the rapid evolution of the epigenetics field, only a limited number of lncRNAs have been extensively studied through detailed experiments. Predictions about their functions remain scarce, and further research is essential to unravel the signaling pathways and regulatory networks implicated in psychiatric disorders such as depression, anxiety, and stress.

While the present study’s results are promising, it is crucial to acknowledge certain limitations. Firstly, because of the cross-sectional design we fail to assess a causal relationship between evaluated components of the investigation. We also intend to emphasize that our research is ongoing, and we plan to conduct follow-up studies to establish longitudinal cohorts in the future. Also, it seems necessitates additional research to delve into the potential mechanisms underlying the observed interactions. Secondly, the reliance on the Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) for dietary assessment introduces the possibility of recall bias. Moreover, the study was confined to overweight/obese women. Future research endeavors should encompass both genders, involve larger populations, and consider diverse obesity phenotypes to provide a more comprehensive understanding of these associations.

Conclusion

Collectively, our findings contribute to the existing body of literature by affirming a positive association between MALAT1 and anxiety in obese and overweight women. Additionally, we observed a positive interaction between GI and TUG1 gene expression concerning DASS-21, depression, and stress. Similarly, a positive interaction was identified between GL and TUG1 gene expression specifically related to stress. However, further studies are imperative to elucidate the intricate interactions between the mentioned lncRNAs and GI and GL in the context of psychological disorders among overweight and obese women.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2224–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hruby A, Manson JE, Qi L, Malik VS, Rimm EB, Sun Q, et al. Determinants and consequences of obesity. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(9):1656–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. D O’Brien P, Hinder LM, Callaghan BC, Feldman EL. Neurological consequences of obesity. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(6):465–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mohamadi A, Shiraseb F, Mirzababaei A, Hosseininasab D, Rasaei N, Clark CC, Mirzaei K. Circulating inflammatory markers may mediate the relationship between healthy plant-based diet and metabolic phenotype obesity in women: a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Clinical Practice. 2022;2022.

  5. Hall KD, Kahan S. Maintenance of lost weight and long-term management of obesity. Med Clin North Am. 2018;102(1):183–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Raman J, Smith E, Hay P. The clinical obesity maintenance model: an integration of psychological constructs including mood, emotional regulation, disordered overeating, habitual cluster behaviours, health literacy and cognitive function. Journal of obesity. 2013;2013.

  7. Cuevas AG, Chen R, Thurber KA, Slopen N, Williams DR. Psychosocial stress and overweight and obesity: findings from the Chicago community adult health study. Ann Behav Med. 2019;53(11):NP–NP.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Gariepy G, Nitka D, Schmitz N. The association between obesity and anxiety disorders in the population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Obes. 2010;34(3):407–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pereira-Miranda E, Costa PR, Queiroz VA, Pereira-Santos M, Santana ML. Overweight and obesity associated with higher depression prevalence in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Nutr. 2017;36(3):223–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bremner JD, Moazzami K, Wittbrodt MT, Nye JA, Lima BB, Gillespie CF, et al. Diet, stress and mental health. Nutrients. 2020;12(8):2428.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Arango C, Dragioti E, Solmi M, Cortese S, Domschke K, Murray RM, et al. Risk and protective factors for mental disorders beyond genetics: an evidence-based atlas. World Psychiatry. 2021;20(3):417–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Rasaei N, Khadem A, Masihi LS, Mirzaei K. Interaction of fatty acid quality indices and genes related to lipid homeostasis on mental health among overweight and obese women. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):9580.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Mwamburi DM, Liebson E, Folstein M, Bungay K, Tucker KL, Qiu WQ. Depression and glycemic intake in the homebound elderly. J Affect Disord. 2011;132(1–2):94–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Foster-Powell K, Holt SHA, Brand-Miller JC. International table of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 20021,2. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76(1):5–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Barclay AW, Brand-Miller JC, Wolever TM. Glycemic index, glycemic load, and glycemic response are not the same. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(7):1839–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Salari-Moghaddam A, Saneei P, Larijani B, Esmaillzadeh A. Glycemic index, glycemic load, and depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2019;73(3):356–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Haghighatdoost F, Azadbakht L, Keshteli AH, Feinle-Bisset C, Daghaghzadeh H, Afshar H, et al. Glycemic index, glycemic load, and common psychological disorders. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;103(1):201–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Milagro-Yoldi FI, Mansego-Talavera ML, Miguel-Vázquez C, Martinez JA. Dietary factors, epigenetic modifications and obesity outcomes: progresses and perspectives. 2012.

  19. Bidisha M, Gouranga M. Epigenomics: the interplay of genetic and epigenetic factors behind psychological disorders. Res J Biotechnol Vol. 2021;16:2.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rasaei N, Samadi M, Daneshzad E, Hassan-zadeh M, Gholami F, SaeedYekaninejad M et al. The transcript level of long non-coding RNAs; MALAT1 and TUG1, and the association with metabolic syndrome-related parameters in women with overweight and obesity. J Diabetes Metabolic Disorders. 2023:1–13.

  21. Rasaei N, Gholami F, Samadi M, Shiraseb F, Khadem A, Yekaninejad MS, et al. The interaction between MALAT1 and TUG1 with dietary fatty acid quality indices on visceral adiposity index and body adiposity index. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Mosley AL, Ozcan S. Glucose regulates insulin gene transcription by hyperacetylation of histone h4. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(22):19660–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pirola L, Balcerczyk A, Okabe J, El-Osta A. Epigenetic phenomena linked to diabetic complications. Nat Reviews Endocrinol. 2010;6(12):665–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Siebel AL, Fernandez AZ, El-Osta A. Glycemic memory associated epigenetic changes. Biochem Pharmacol. 2010;80(12):1853–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ponting CP, Oliver PL, Reik W. Evolution and functions of long noncoding RNAs. Cell. 2009;136(4):629–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang B, Xia Z-a, Zhong B, Xiong X, Sheng C, Wang Y, et al. Distinct hippocampal expression profiles of long non-coding RNAs in an Alzheimer’s disease model. Mol Neurobiol. 2017;54:4833–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Huang X, Luo Y-l, Mao Y-s, Ji J-l. The link between long noncoding RNAs and depression. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2017;73:73–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bernard D, Prasanth KV, Tripathi V, Colasse S, Nakamura T, Xuan Z, et al. A long nuclear-retained non‐coding RNA regulates synaptogenesis by modulating gene expression. EMBO J. 2010;29(18):3082–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Shirvani Farsani Z, Zahirodin A, Ghaderian SMH, Shams J, Naghavi Gargari B. The role of long non-coding RNA MALAT1 in patients with bipolar disorder. Metab Brain Dis. 2020;35:1077–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Guo C, Qi Y, Qu J, Gai L, Shi Y, Yuan C. Pathophysiological functions of the lncRNA TUG1. Curr Pharm Design. 2020;26(6):688–700.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang J, Yuan L, Zhang X, Hamblin MH, Zhu T, Meng F, et al. Altered long non-coding RNA transcriptomic profiles in brain microvascular endothelium after cerebral ischemia. Exp Neurol. 2016;277:162–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mirmiran P, Esfahani FH, Mehrabi Y, Hedayati M, Azizi F. Reliability and relative validity of an FFQ for nutrients in the Tehran lipid and glucose study. Public Health Nutr. 2010;13(5):654–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ghaffarpour M, Houshiar-Rad A, Kianfar H. The manual for household measures, cooking yields factors and edible portion of foods. Tehran: Nashre Olume Keshavarzy. 1999;7(213):42–58.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Willett W. Nutritional epidemiology. Oxford University Press; 2012.

  35. Willett W, Manson J, Liu S. Glycemic index, glycemic load, and risk of type 2 diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76(1):S274–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the Beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995;33(3):335–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bayani AA. Reliability and preliminary evidence of validity of a Farsi version of the depression anxiety stress scales. Percept Mot Skills. 2010;111(1):107–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ng F, Trauer T, Dodd S, Callaly T, Campbell S, Berk M. The validity of the 21-item version of the depression anxiety stress scales as a routine clinical outcome measure. Acta Neuropsychiatrica. 2007;19(5):304–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Henry JD, Crawford JR. The short-form version of the Depression anxiety stress scales (DASS‐21): construct validity and normative data in a large non‐clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol. 2005;44(2):227–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Aadahl M, Jørgensen T. Validation of a new self-report instrument for measuring physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(7):1196–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Gholami F, Rasaei N, Samadi M, Yekaninejad MS, Keshavarz SA, Javdan G, et al. The relationship of genetic risk score with cardiometabolic risk factors: a cross-sectional study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022;22(1):459.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Mirzaei K, Hossein-Nezhad A, Keshavarz S, Eshaghi S, Koohdani F, Saboor-Yaraghi A, et al. Insulin resistance via modification of PGC1α function identifying a possible preventive role of vitamin D analogues in chronic inflammatory state of obesity. A double blind clinical trial study. Minerva Med. 2014;105(1):63–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Spadaro PA, Flavell CR, Widagdo J, Ratnu VS, Troup M, Ragan C, et al. Long noncoding RNA-directed epigenetic regulation of gene expression is associated with anxiety-like behavior in mice. Biol Psychiatry. 2015;78(12):848–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Liao W, Liu Y, Huang H, Xie H, Gong W, Liu D, et al. Intersectional analysis of chronic mild stress-induced lncRNA-mRNA interaction networks in rat hippocampus reveals potential anti-depression/anxiety drug targets. Neurobiol Stress. 2021;15:100347.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Cui X, Niu W, Kong L, He M, Jiang K, Chen S, et al. Long noncoding RNA expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and suicide risk in Chinese patients with major depressive disorder. Brain Behav. 2017;7(6):e00711.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhou Y, Lutz P-E, Wang YC, Ragoussis J, Turecki G. Global long non-coding RNA expression in the rostral anterior cingulate cortex of depressed suicides. Translational Psychiatry. 2018;8(1):224.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang L-M, Wang M-H, Yang H-C, Tian T, Sun G-F, Ji Y-F, et al. Dopaminergic neuron injury in Parkinson’s disease is mitigated by interfering lncRNA SNHG14 expression to regulate the miR-133b/α-synuclein pathway. Aging. 2019;11(21):9264.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Haelterman NA, Yoon WH, Sandoval H, Jaiswal M, Shulman JM, Bellen HJ. A mitocentric view of Parkinson’s disease. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2014;37:137–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Seki T, Yamagata H, Uchida S, Chen C, Kobayashi A, Kobayashi M, et al. Altered expression of long noncoding RNAs in patients with major depressive disorder. J Psychiatr Res. 2019;117:92–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Piórkowska K, Zygmunt K, Hunter W, Wróblewska K. MALAT1: a long non-coding RNA with multiple functions and its role in processes associated with fat deposition. Genes. 2024;15(4):479.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Patel RS, Carter G, El Bassit G, Patel AA, Cooper DR, Murr M, Patel NA. Adipose-derived stem cells from lean and obese humans show depot specific differences in their stem cell markers, exosome contents and senescence: role of protein kinase C delta (PKCδ) in adipose stem cell niche. Stem cell Invest. 2016;3.

  52. Kong X, Patel NA, Chalfant CE, Cooper DR. Ceramide synthesis regulates biogenesis and packaging of exosomal MALAT1 from adipose derived stem cells, increases dermal fibroblast migration and mitochondrial function. Cell Communication Signal. 2023;21(1):221.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Piórkowska K, Żukowski K, Ropka-Molik K, Tyra M. New long-non coding RNAs related to fat deposition based on pig model. Annals Anim Sci. 2022;22(4):1211–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Ming Y, Deng Z, Tian X, Jia Y, Ning M, Cheng S. Anti-apoptotic capacity of MALAT1 on hippocampal neurons correlates with CASP3 DNA methylation in a mouse model of autism. Metab Brain Dis. 2023;38(8):2591–602.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Han J, Shen L, Zhan Z, Liu Y, Zhang C, Guo R, et al. The long noncoding RNA MALAT1 modulates adipose loss in cancer-associated cachexia by suppressing adipogenesis through PPAR-γ. Nutr Metabolism. 2021;18:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Safari MR, Komaki A, Arsang-Jang S, Taheri M, Ghafouri-Fard S. Expression pattern of long non-coding RNAs in schizophrenic patients. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2019;39(2):211–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Sayad A, Omrani MD, Fallah H, Taheri M, Ghafouri-Fard S. Aberrant expression of long non-coding RNAs in peripheral blood of autistic patients. J Mol Neurosci. 2019;67:276–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Abdolmaleki A, Ferdowsi S, Asadi A, Panahi Y. Long non-coding RNAs associated with brain disorders: a literature review. Gene Cell Tissue. 2021;8(3).

  59. Zhang Y, Gu M, Ma Y, Peng Y. LncRNA TUG1 reduces inflammation and enhances insulin sensitivity in white adipose tissue by regulating miR-204/SIRT1 axis in obesity mice. Mol Cell Biochem. 2020;475(1):171–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Ebrahimi R, Toolabi K, Jannat Ali Pour N, Mohassel Azadi S, Bahiraee A, Zamani-Garmsiri F, Emamgholipour S. Adipose tissue gene expression of long non-coding RNAs; MALAT1, TUG1 in obesity: is it associated with metabolic profile and lipid homeostasis-related genes expression? Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2020;12(1):36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Amirinejad A, Darand M, Davies IG, Mazidi M, Nadjarzadeh A, Mirzaei M, Khayyatzadeh SS. Higher dietary glycemic load is inversely associated with stress prevalence among Iranian adults. BMC Neurosci. 2022;23(1):28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Rasaei N, Fallah M, Gholami F, Karimi M, Noori S, Bahrampour N, et al. The association between glycemic index and glycemic load and quality of life among overweight and obese women: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nutr. 2023;9(1):30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study received support from grants provided by the Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, under grant number 1400-3-212-56212.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Niloufar Rasaei and Fataneh Esmaeili are equally co-first authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), P.O. Box:14155-6117, Tehran, Iran

    Niloufar Rasaei & Khadijeh Mirzaei

  2. Network of Interdisciplinarity in Neonates and Infants (NINI), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran

    Niloufar Rasaei

  3. Department of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Fataneh Esmaeili

  4. Department of Nutrition, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

    Alireza Khadem

  5. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Mir Saeed Yekaninejad

Authors
  1. Niloufar Rasaei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fataneh Esmaeili
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alireza Khadem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mir Saeed Yekaninejad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Khadijeh Mirzaei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

NR performed experimental tests. NR and KM participated in the study design and interpreted results. NR and KM conducted sample collection. NR performed biochemical experiments and helped with the methodology. MSY and NR performed the statistical analysis. NR, FE, AKH, and KM wrote the draft of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khadijeh Mirzaei.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol received approval from the ethics committee of the Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) under the identification number IR.TUMS.MEDICINE.REC.1401.073. Before participating in the study, each participant received comprehensive information about the study protocol and willingly provided written and informed consent. All procedures and methodologies adhered to the relevant guidelines, regulations, and principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

The final manuscript received approval from all authors, and they provided consent for its publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rasaei, N., Esmaeili, F., Khadem, A. et al. lncRNA TUG1 transcript levels and psychological disorders: insights into interplay of glycemic index and glycemic load. BMC Med Genomics 17, 221 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-024-01976-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-024-01976-7

Keywords

BMC Medical Genomics

ISSN: 1755-8794

Contact us