Skip to main content

Volume 11 Supplement 4

Proceedings of the 6th iDASH Privacy and Security Workshop 2017

Proceedings

Publication of this supplement has not been supported by sponsorship. Information about the source of funding for publication charges can be found in the individual articles. The articles have undergone the journal's standard peer review process for supplements. The Supplement Editors declare that they have no competing interests.

Orlando, FL, USA14 October 2017

Workshop website

Edited by Shuang Wang, Xiaoqian Jiang, XiaoFeng Wang and Haixu Tang.

  1. One of the tasks in the 2017 iDASH secure genome analysis competition was to enable training of logistic regression models over encrypted genomic data. More precisely, given a list of approximately 1500 patien...

    Authors: Hao Chen, Ran Gilad-Bachrach, Kyoohyung Han, Zhicong Huang, Amir Jalali, Kim Laine and Kristin Lauter
    Citation: BMC Medical Genomics 2018 11(Suppl 4):81
  2. Logistic regression is a popular technique used in machine learning to construct classification models. Since the construction of such models is based on computing with large datasets, it is an appealing idea ...

    Authors: Charlotte Bonte and Frederik Vercauteren
    Citation: BMC Medical Genomics 2018 11(Suppl 4):86
  3. Security concerns have been raised since big data became a prominent tool in data analysis. For instance, many machine learning algorithms aim to generate prediction models using training data which contain se...

    Authors: Andrey Kim, Yongsoo Song, Miran Kim, Keewoo Lee and Jung Hee Cheon
    Citation: BMC Medical Genomics 2018 11(Suppl 4):83

Annual Journal Metrics

  • Citation Impact 2023
    Journal Impact Factor: 2.1
    5-year Journal Impact Factor: 2.5
    Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 0.581
    SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 0.703

    Speed 2023
    Submission to first editorial decision (median days): 34
    Submission to acceptance (median days): 164

    Usage 2023
    Downloads: 1,335,753
    Altmetric mentions: 593

Peer-review Terminology

  • The following summary describes the peer review process for this journal:

    Identity transparency: Single anonymized

    Reviewer interacts with: Editor

    Review information published: Review reports. Reviewer Identities reviewer opt in. Author/reviewer communication

    More information is available here

Sign up for article alerts and news from this journal