Volume 12 Supplement 10
Publication of this supplement has not been supported by sponsorship. Information about the source of funding for publication charges can be found in the individual articles. The articles have undergone the journal's standard peer review process for supplements. MK was not involved in the peer review of his paper. No other competing interests were declared.
Madrid, Spain3-6 December 2018
As a standardized vocabulary of phenotypic abnormalities associated with human diseases, the Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) has been widely used by researchers to annotate phenotypes of genes/proteins. For sav...
Accurate inference of the evolutionary history of a tumor has important implications for understanding and potentially treating the disease. While a number of methods have been proposed to reconstruct the evol...
Prediction of pathogenic genes is crucial for disease prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. But traditional genetic localization methods are often technique-difficulty and time-consuming. With the development ...
Studies have shown that miRNAs are functionally associated with the development of many human diseases, but the roles of miRNAs in diseases and their underlying molecular mechanisms have not been fully underst...
It is significant to identificate complex biological mechanisms of various diseases in biomedical research. Recently, the growing generation of tremendous amount of data in genomics, epigenomics, metagenomics,...
Understanding the complex biological mechanisms of cancer patient survival using genomic and clinical data is vital, not only to develop new treatments for patients, but also to improve survival prediction. Ho...
Citation Impact 2023
Journal Impact Factor: 2.1
5-year Journal Impact Factor: 2.5
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 0.581
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 0.703
Speed 2023
Submission to first editorial decision (median days): 34
Submission to acceptance (median days): 164
Usage 2023
Downloads: 1,335,753
Altmetric mentions: 593
The following summary describes the peer review process for this journal:
Identity transparency: Single anonymized
Reviewer interacts with: Editor
Review information published: Review reports. Reviewer Identities reviewer opt in. Author/reviewer communication