Skip to main content

Volume 13 Supplement 9

The International Conference on Intelligent Biology and Medicine (ICIBM) 2019: Computational methods and application in medical genomics (part 2)

Research

Publication of this supplement has not been supported by sponsorship. Information about the source of funding for publication charges can be found in the individual articles. The articles have undergone the journal's standard peer review process for supplements. The Supplement Editors declare that they have no competing interests.

Columbus, OH, USA9-11 June 2019

Edited by Chi Zhang, Ewy Mathé, Xia Ning, Zhongming Zhao, Kai Wang, Lang Li and Yan Guo

Conference website

Part one of this supplement has been published here.

Related articles have been published as a supplement to BMC Bioinformatics, BMC Genomics and BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

  1. Compared to the conventional differential expression approach, differential coexpression analysis represents a different yet complementary perspective into diseased transcriptomes. In particular, global loss o...

    Authors: Hui Yu, Danqian Chen, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji, Ying-Yong Zhao and Yan Guo
    Citation: BMC Medical Genomics 2020 13(Suppl 9):134
  2. Developing binary classification rules based on SNP observations has been a major challenge for many modern bioinformatics applications, e.g., predicting risk of future disease events in complex conditions suc...

    Authors: Ali Foroughi pour, Maciej Pietrzak, Lara E. Sucheston-Campbell, Ezgi Karaesmen, Lori A. Dalton and Grzegorz A. Rempała
    Citation: BMC Medical Genomics 2020 13(Suppl 9):133
  3. Colon cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer deaths in the USA and around the world. Molecular level characters, such as gene expression levels and mutations, may provide profound information for precis...

    Authors: Jiannan Liu, Chuanpeng Dong, Guanglong Jiang, Xiaoyu Lu, Yunlong Liu and Huanmei Wu
    Citation: BMC Medical Genomics 2020 13(Suppl 9):135

Annual Journal Metrics

Peer-review Terminology

  • The following summary describes the peer review process for this journal:

    Identity transparency: Single anonymized

    Reviewer interacts with: Editor

    Review information published: Review reports. Reviewer Identities reviewer opt in. Author/reviewer communication

    More information is available here

Sign up for article alerts and news from this journal