- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Disease-associated alleles in genome-wide association studies are enriched for derived low frequency alleles relative to HapMap and neutral expectations
© Lachance; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
- Received: 24 March 2010
- Accepted: 10 December 2010
- Published: 10 December 2010
Genome-wide association studies give insight into the genetic basis of common diseases. An open question is whether the allele frequency distributions and ancestral vs. derived states of disease-associated alleles differ from the rest of the genome. Characteristics of disease-associated alleles can be used to increase the yield of future studies.
The set of all common disease-associated alleles found in genome-wide association studies prior to January 2010 was analyzed and compared with HapMap and theoretical null expectations. In addition, allele frequency distributions of different disease classes were assessed. Ages of HapMap and disease-associated alleles were also estimated.
The allele frequency distribution of HapMap alleles was qualitatively similar to neutral expectations. However, disease-associated alleles were more likely to be low frequency derived alleles relative to null expectations. 43.7% of disease-associated alleles were ancestral alleles. The mean frequency of disease-associated alleles was less than randomly chosen CEU HapMap alleles (0.394 vs. 0.610, after accounting for probability of detection). Similar patterns were observed for the subset of disease-associated alleles that have been verified in multiple studies. SNPs implicated in genome-wide association studies were enriched for young SNPs compared to randomly selected HapMap loci. Odds ratios of disease-associated alleles tended to be less than 1.5 and varied by frequency, confirming previous studies.
Alleles associated with genetic disease differ from randomly selected HapMap alleles and neutral expectations. The evolutionary history of alleles (frequency and ancestral vs. derived state) influences whether they are implicated in genome-wide assocation studies.
- Marker Allele
- Allele Frequency Distribution
- Phenotypic Classis
- Ancestral Allele
- Neutral Expectation
The onset of affordable high-throughput genotyping technology has enabled association studies to be conducted on a genome-wide scale, and multiple successes have occurred using this approach [1, 2]. Notable examples include genes associated with LDL cholesterol levels , colorectal cancer , and type 1 diabetes . Despite these successes, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been unable to account for the majority of heritable variation for most diseases [6, 7]. One reason for the mixed success of GWAS is that the efficacy of such studies depends upon the underlying genetic architecture of traits [8–10]. Also relevant is the accuracy of the common disease-common variant hypothesis. Under this formulation, complex diseases are caused by high frequency alleles. By contrast, the genetic heterogeneity (rare allele-major effect) hypothesis proposes that distinct low-frequency alleles are responsible for the same trait in different individuals. Regardless of the relative validity of each of these hypotheses [11, 12], there are now enough genome-wide association studies to be able to say something about the frequencies and ancestral or derived state of disease-associated alleles relative to HapMap and neutral expectations. A previous study gave an initial glimpse into the nature of disease-associated alleles, finding a median allele frequency of 0.40 . However, less than 50 replicated SNPs were analyzed in the review article by Iles. Multiple studies have found that the allele frequencies of disease-associated SNPs do not significantly differ across populations compared to random SNPs [14, 15]. Additionally, alleles associated with genetic disease are underrepresented in intergenic regions and overrepresented in nonsynonymous sites and 5 kb promoter regions . An open question is whether the allele frequency distribution and ancestral vs. derived states of disease-associated alleles differ from the rest of the genome. What types of disease-associated alleles have been found in GWAS to date?
Alleles can be classified by frequency, ancestral vs. derived state, and relative disease risk. Disease-associated marker alleles need not be causal; they may be linked to alleles that are actually responsible for increased risk. Importantly, the alleles characterized in this paper are marker alleles. Because statistical power is maximized at intermediate allele frequencies , alleles detected in a GWAS are unlikely to be rare. Alleles can also be classified as ancestral or derived, where ancestral alleles are shared with closely related species and derived alleles are not . There is currently a lack of published studies indicating whether disease-associated alleles are enriched for ancestral or derived states. Finally, alleles can be classified by their relative risk (measured as an odds ratio). In many GWAS, disease-associated alleles increase risk by only a modest amount, i.e. odds ratios are less than 1.5 . However, it is unknown whether these odds ratios vary by ancestral vs. derived state. In addition, the first study to detect a particular association can overestimate the odds ratio, a phenomenon dubbed the "winner's curse" .
The aim of this study was to determine the characteristics of disease-associated alleles and compare this data to null expectations from HapMap data and the neutral theory. Allele frequency distributions and ancestral vs. derived states were obtained for every disease-associated allele found in genome-wide association studies prior to January 2010. The hypothesis that disease-associated alleles do not differ from the rest of the genome  was also tested.
Null expectations: HapMap data
Alleles from the HapMap dataset were obtained to serve as a baseline of genomic diversity. These alleles were subsequently weighted by the probability of detection in a GWAS. The set of all HapMap SNPs from data release #27 were downloaded via the HapMart tool . This build included merged data from phases II and III of the International HapMap Project . A Perl script was then used to randomly select 1000 unique SNPs from this file. The positions of HapMap SNPs were tested to ensure that linkage disequilibrium was minimal (distances between SNPs were at least 200 kb). Because allele frequencies can vary from population to population, and the majority of GWAS use European and European-American cases and controls, CEU allele frequencies were used in this study. This allowed HapMap dataset to act as a control for demographic processes. While disease prevalence and allele frequencies vary among populations , population-level differences in allele frequencies are similar for disease-associated SNPs and random genomic SNPs . An additional consideration is that SNP discovery protocols may bias the HapMap dataset towards high frequency alleles [24, 25]. For each SNP, alleles were chosen at random after weighting by allele frequency. Thus, a SNP with allele frequencies of 0.80 and 0.20 would have an 80% chance of yielding the major allele. Because high frequency alleles are more likely to be ancestral , randomly chosen alleles from the HapMap dataset are more likely to be ancestral than derived.
Outgroups (such as chimpanzees) enable SNPs to be polarized and ancestral states to be inferred. Ancestral alleles were determined via BLAST searches of disease-associated SNP regions against the chimpanzee genome. In addition, the single nucleotide polymorphism database, dbSNP, contains information on the ancestral state of SNPs at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP. Ancestral alleles in dbSNP were inferred via parsimony . SNPs were only selected if ancestral allele states could be inferred. HapMap alleles were then binned by allele frequency and ancestral vs. derived state. Unlike disease-associated alleles, randomly selected HapMap alleles are not weighted by their probability of detection. Because of this, comparisons between the allele frequency distribution of disease-associated alleles and null expectations incorporated the probability that a particular allele is detectable in a GWAS. Phase three of the HapMap project used the Illumina Human1 M and Affymetrix SNP 6.0 platforms (the same platforms used in many GWAS). This indicates that the HapMap dataset served as an appropriate control for GWAS data.
Null expectations: neutral theory
Probability of detection (statistical power calculations)
Because statistical power varies by allele frequency , computer simulations were used to calculate the probability of detecting an association between disease and a marker allele at a particular frequency. Statistical power calculations were obtained via the Windows program QUANTO [34, 35]. This program numerically calculates power for a variety of experimental designs, but it does not explicitly take into account ages of SNPs and ancestral vs. derived states. Statistical power is a function of linkage disequilibrium between causal and marker alleles (see Appendix). The following parameter values were used: 2500 cases and controls, a p-value of 5 × 10-8, complete linkage, multiplicative dominance. Statistical power was calculated for odds ratios ranging from 1 to 2 (at increments of 0.01) and allele frequencies ranging from 0 to 1 (at increments of 0.01). As indicated by Figure 1B, alleles with low odds ratios can only be detected at intermediate allele frequencies.
It is coincidental that the expression in Equation 6 also gives the expected heterozygosity. Different sample sizes and/or odds ratios would yield different expressions for the probability of detection.
Null expectations: weighted frequency distributions
Empirical data: disease-associated alleles
The set of all disease-associated alleles found prior to January 1, 2010 was obtained to investigate whether these alleles differed from the rest of the genome. An excellent database of GWAS and disease-associated SNPs exists online at http://www.genome.gov/gwastudies and it was used in this study [16, 36]. This Catalog of Published Genome-Wide Association Studies includes every disease-associated SNP to date. Criteria for inclusion in this database included p-values < 10-5 and a minimum of 100,000 SNPs tested in the initial stage of a study . The set of all genome-wide association studies prior to January 1, 2010 spans 486 papers and a total of 2186 disease-associated SNPs. Some of these SNPs were present in multiple studies, and in many cases the disease-associated allele was not listed in the database. Allele frequencies in control populations were obtained from NHGRI's Catalog of Published Genome-Wide Association Studies. When allele frequency data were absent from this database, CEU HapMap frequencies were used. If a particular SNP was associated with diseases in multiple studies, mean allele frequencies were calculated. The ancestral vs. derived state of each allele was determined via dbSNP. When ancestral allele state could not be inferred, SNPs were omitted from the dataset. After taking into account ancestral vs. derived states of alleles, a total of 1143 disease-associated SNPs remained. Of these SNPs, 530 had odds ratio data.
For comparisons with null expectations, disease-associated SNPs were binned into 10% allele frequency intervals (see Figure 3). Differences between the allele-frequency distributions of disease-associated alleles and null expectations were assessed via χ2 goodness-of-fit tests. Relative magnitudes of disease-associated and control allele frequencies were compared via Mann-Whitney U tests. Proportions of ancestral alleles were compared via binomial tests, with a null hypothesis that equal proportions of disease-associated and control alleles were ancestral. In addition, 95% confidence intervals of mean allele frequency were found by sampling with replacement. This bootstrap analysis was performed in MATLAB (100000 replicates) . It is possible that alleles found in multiple studies have different characteristics than alleles found in a single study. Because of this, the mean frequency and evolutionary history of replicated alleles (alleles implicated in multiple studies) were compared with the overall patterns of disease-associated alleles. A total of 142 replicated alleles had frequency and evolutionary history data.
Alleles implicated in GWAS were also sorted into seven different phenotypic classes (cancer, cardiovascular, metabolism, miscellaneous disease, morphological, and neurological). Some alleles were associated with multiple phenotypic classes. The morphological class included alleles that were not technically associated with any disease. Instead, they were associated with traits such as height and hair color. 92 of 1143 GWAS alleles were implicated in studies of non-European populations, and the remaining 1051 alleles were re-analyzed to determine whether this had any effect. Because of the small number of alleles implicated in studies of non-European populations, additional analysis was not conducted on these 92 GWAS alleles. See Additional file 1 for a list of SNPs, allele frequencies, ancestral vs. derived states, odds ratios, and phenotypic class.
To test whether the properties of disease-associated alleles changed over time, disease-associated were binned into six-month intervals by date of first publication. Mean frequency, probability ancestral, and odds ratio data were calculated for each time interval. To determine whether genotyping platforms biased the properties of alleles, data from Affymetrix, Illumina, and Perlegen arrays were compared. Many studies used multiple genotyping platforms, and characteristics of disease-associated alleles in these studies were also analyzed. The number of genotyped SNPs passing quality control varied in each study. To assess whether this had any effect, disease-associated alleles were binned into three intervals corresponding to the number of genotyped SNPs ( < 500,000, between 500,000 and 1,000,000, and >1,000,000). These numbers include imputed SNPs.
Estimated ages of SNPs
Disease-associated alleles vs. null expectations
Mean frequency of a randomly chosen allele
HapMap data (n = 1000, unweighted)
HapMap data (n = 1000, weighted)
Theoretical (neutral, unweighted)
Theoretical (neutral, weighted)
Cancer (n = 112)
Cardiovascular (n = 145)
Metabolism (n = 160)
Miscellaneous disease (n = 290)
Morphological (n = 276)
Neurological (n = 135)
Multiple phenotypic classes (n = 25)
All GWAS alleles (n = 1143)
All replicated GWAS alleles (n = 142)
Despite these similarities, there were important quantitative differences between HapMap alleles and neutral expectations. HapMap alleles were less likely to be ancestral than alleles under the neutral theory (0.623 vs. 0.741 for the unweighted scenario, and 0.568 vs. 0.650 for the weighted scenario). HapMap alleles were also more likely to be found at intermediate frequencies, and goodness-of-fit tests indicate that differences existed between the allele frequency distributions of HapMap and neutral alleles (p-value < 10-10 for both the unweighted and weighted scenarios, χ2 test with 19 d.f.). The relative lack of HapMap loci with a minor allele frequency < 0.1 may be due to ascertainment bias, as SNPs identified from a small panel of individuals are known to have an excess of intermediate frequency alleles .
Sensitivity analysis of the HapMap dataset suggests the absence of selection bias in the 1000 randomly selected SNPs. The mean frequency of minor alleles was 0.219 for the HapMap dataset used in this paper, compared to 0.214 and 0.199 for additional sets of 1000 SNPs from the HapMap (CEU) and Perlegen (EUR) databases, respectively.
Empirical data from genome-wide association studies indicated that a majority of disease-associated alleles were derived. Out of 1143 unique SNPs, disease-associated alleles were ancestral in 499 cases and derived in 644 cases. As shown in Table 1 the proportion of ancestral alleles was less than HapMap and neutral theory expectations (p-value < 0.0001, binomial test for each comparison). Alleles shared with chimpanzees were less likely to be associated with genetic disease than alleles that are not shared with chimpanzees.
Alleles implicated in multiple studies showed similar patterns to the overall set of disease-associated alleles. Replicated alleles had a mean frequency of 0.396 and a 0.437 probability of being ancestral. The allele frequency distribution of replicated alleles also exhibited an excess of rare alleles relative to null expectations (Figure 3B).
Different phenotypic classes
Similar patterns were observed for each of the phenotypic classes (Table 1). In each case, disease-associated alleles had lower frequencies than HapMap and neutral expectations (p-value < 0.0001 for each comparison, Mann-Whitney U test). Regardless of phenotypic class, disease-associated alleles were more likely to be derived alleles than randomly selected HapMap alleles and neutral expectations (p-value < 0.05 for each comparison, binomial test). Alleles associated with cardiovascular disease were most likely to be low frequency derived alleles. Alleles associated with neurological disease had the highest mean allele frequency, and alleles associated with morphological traits were more likely to be ancestral. However, differences among phenotypic classes were smaller than the differences between each phenotypic class and null expectations (p-value < 0.05 for allele frequency and ancestral vs. derived data, One-way ANOVA).
Disease-associated alleles from different genotyping platforms
Mean frequency (disease-associated alleles)
Proportion ancestral (disease associated alleles)
Affymetrix (n = 638)
Illumina (n = 852)
Perlegen (n = 90)
Multiple platforms used (n = 430)
SNPs genotyped in study
< 500,000 (n = 597)
500,00 to 1,000,000 (n = 205)
> 1,000,000 (n = 322)
Estimated ages of SNPs
Genome-wide association studies were enriched for young SNPs compared to randomly selected HapMap loci (Figure 4B). Mean ages of SNPs were estimated to be 2.78 Ne generations for HapMap loci and 2.74 Ne generations for GWAS loci. However, the spread around the mean was quite large for each locus type. The probability densities in Figure 4B reveal that SNPs arising in the last 1 Ne generations were over-represented in the GWAS dataset. This occurred because disease-associated alleles had an excess of low frequency derived alleles (the same sorts of alleles that tend to occur in young SNPs). Recall that these calculations assumed that SNPs were neutral. Directional selection would reduce the expected ages of SNPs for both types of loci . Similarly, ascertainment bias due to the small sample size of the SNP discovery panel  can affect both types of SNPs.
Disease-associated alleles were more likely to be low frequency derived alleles than neutral and CEU HapMap expectations. Patterns were similar for alleles associated with different phenotypic classes. These findings were independent of publication date and genotyping platform. SNPs implicated in genome-wide association studies were enriched for young SNPs compared to randomly selected HapMap loci. One caveat is that that the majority of published studies to date have used european populations, and it is unclear whether these patterns will apply to other populations.
Statistical power, sample sizes, and allele frequencies
Because statistical power is minimal at extreme allele frequencies, it is not surprising that most disease-associated alleles have minor allele frequencies greater than 0.1 (Figure 3). The relative inability of GWAS to explain the high heritabilities of many diseases  suggests that many genes responsible for common diseases might actually be at undetectably low frequencies. Simulations reveal that much of the fitness variance associated with genetic diseases can be due to very low frequency, large-effect alleles . Theoretical work also indicates that rare causal alleles can create associations that are credited to common marker alleles (a phenomenon that has been called "synthetic association") . Alternatively, common genetic diseases may be due to multiple allele of small effect, synergistic epistasis, and/or genotype-by-environment interactions . To avoid only detecting associations with intermediate frequency alleles, larger sample sizes are needed. Increasing the number of genotyped SNPs also results in a greater likelihood of detecting an association , but all SNPs are not equally informative. In addition, the results of this study suggest that future GWAS may benefit from the inclusion of many young SNPs with low frequency derived alleles.
Genetic background and linkage phase of causal and marker alleles
Genetic background and linkage phase may explain why disease-associated alleles were enriched for derived alleles. Consider the following thought experiment: Two alleles already segregate at a marker locus when a causal mutation occurs at a nearby locus. If the causal mutation occurs in an ancestral genetic background, only a small proportion of disease-associated marker alleles will be in phase with the causal mutation. This is because ancestral alleles tend to have higher frequencies than derived alleles . As a result, the (P(B|A) - P(B|a))2 term in Equation A1 (see Appendix) tends to be smaller when causal alleles are in phase with an ancestral allele at the marker locus. All other things being equal, linkage disequilibrium (r 2) and statistical power are greater when causal mutations occur in a derived genetic background.
Recombination breaks down linkage disequilibrium between causal and marker alleles over time, reducing the likelihood of statistical associations. This is consistent with the finding that SNPs showing detectable associations with genetic disease are younger than randomly selected HapMap SNPs. Genome-wide association studies are also less likely to be successful if mutations occur multiple times at a causal locus. This is because the causal alleles can be found in multiple genetic backgrounds, reducing statistical associations between causal alleles and marker alleles. Population heterogeneity can also be an issue, as causal mutations can occur in different genetic backgrounds in different populations [49, 50].
Natural selection against disease alleles
Natural selection against deleterious alleles may also cause disease-associated alleles to differ from the rest of the genome. Population genetic theory indicates that marker alleles linked to low fitness causal alleles are expected to be uncommon [30, 51]. This is in agreement with the finding that alleles associated with genetic disease tend to be found at lower frequencies than randomly selected HapMap alleles. Natural selection may also be able to explain differences in SNP age between disease-associated alleles and HapMap alleles.
The efficacy of selection varies for different genetic diseases. Because fitness refers to the expected contribution to the next generation's gene pool, diseases with late onset are likely to be found at higher frequencies. In addition, allele frequency distributions are shaped by the evolutionary history of a disease. Selection pressures that change over time can allow disease alleles to segregate at intermediate frequencies . The genetic architecture of a disease also affects the strength of selection: Tajima's D and Dn/Ds ratios reveal that the signature of selection is stronger for Mendelian diseases than complex genetic diseases . This may explain why different phenotypic classes have slightly different profiles (Table 1). However, alleles associated with morphological traits (as opposed to disease) differ from null expectations. Additional factors than natural selection may be required to explain why GWAS alleles differ from the rest of the genome.
Can population size changes explain the observed patterns?
Disease-associated alleles are enriched for derived low frequency alleles, a pattern that can occur when populations increase in size [54, 55]. However, population expansions affect the frequency distributions of all alleles, not just disease-associated alleles. Because HapMap data do not show an excess of derived low frequency alleles relative to neutral expectations (Figure 2), this indicates that population size changes alone cannot fully explain the characteristic patterns of disease-associated alleles.
At these initial stages, alleles found via genome-wide association studies tend to be low hanging fruit. However, there is strong evidence that disease-associated alleles differ from the rest of the genome. Costs of microarray-based genotyping platforms are decreasing, and as the number of SNPs analyzed per individual increases, so too does the chance of detecting direct associations between disease and causal SNPs (rather than merely linked marker SNPs). In addition, direct sequencing is becoming increasingly affordable and it allows previously unknown SNPs to be identified. Because of this, direct sequencing of large genomic regions adjacent to disease-associated marker alleles is advisable. Direct sequencing of GWAS-informed regions can also be combined with familial inheritance patterns to improve genetic linkage analyses. This brings up an intriguing question: are causal alleles for a particular trait more likely to be ancestral or derived? Also, how can GWAS be planned to maximize the likelihood of detecting candidate genes associated with a particular disease? Combining the perspectives of genetic epidemiology and evolutionary genetics allows these questions to be answered.
where P(B|A) and P(B|a) are the probabilities that a haplotype has the marker allele B given a linked causal allele of A or a, y is the frequency of the disease allele at the causal locus, and x is the frequency of the disease-associated allele at the marker locus.
I thank D. Dykhuizen, W. Eanes, E. Hatchwell, L. Jung, E. Sezgin, M. Talbert, J. True, and S. Yeh for helpful comments and suggestions. The constructive comments of two reviewers (J. Zhao and N. Timpson) greatly improved the quality of this paper. This work was supported by a National Institutes of Health Predoctoral Training Grant (5 T32 GM007964-24).
- Altshuler D, Daly MJ, Lander ES: Genetic mapping in human disease. Science. 2008, 322 (5903): 881-888. 10.1126/science.1156409.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium: Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature. 2007, 447 (7145): 661-678. 10.1038/nature05911.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kotowski IK, Pertsemlidis A, Luke A, Cooper RS, Vega GL, Cohen JC, Hobbs HH: A spectrum of PCSK9 Alleles contributes to plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. American Journal of Human Genetics. 2006, 78 (3): 410-422. 10.1086/500615.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Tomlinson I, Webb E, Carvajal-Carmona L, Broderick P, Kemp Z, Spain S, Penegar S, Chandler I, Gorman M, Wood W, et al: A genome-wide association scan of tag SNPs identifies a susceptibility variant for colorectal cancer at 8q24.21. Nature Genetics. 2007, 39 (8): 984-988. 10.1038/ng2085.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Todd JA, Walker NM, Cooper JD, Smyth DJ, Downes K, Plagnol V, Bailey R, Nejentsev S, Field SF, Payne F, et al: Robust associations of four new chromosome regions from genome-wide analyses of type 1 diabetes. Nature Genetics. 2007, 39 (7): 857-864. 10.1038/ng2068.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Manolio TA, Collins FS, Cox NJ, Goldstein DB, Hindorff LA, Hunter DJ, McCarthy MI, Ramos EM, Cardon LR, Chakravarti A, et al: Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature. 2009, 461 (7265): 747-753. 10.1038/nature08494.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Maher B: Personal genomes: The case of the missing heritability. Nature. 2008, 456 (7218): 18-21. 10.1038/456018a.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clark AG, Boerwinkle E, Hixson J, Sing CF: Determinants of the success of whole-genome association testing. Genome Res. 2005, 15 (11): 1463-1467. 10.1101/gr.4244005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clarke AJ, Cooper DN: GWAS: heritability missing in action?. European Journal of Human Genetics. 2010, 18: 859-861. 10.1038/ejhg.2010.35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Moore JH, Williams SM: Epistasis and its implications for personal genetics. Am J Hum Genet. 2009, 85 (3): 309-320. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.08.006.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Goldstein DB: Common genetic variation and human traits. N Engl J Med. 2009, 360 (17): 1696-1698. 10.1056/NEJMp0806284.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hirschhorn JN: Genomewide association studies--illuminating biologic pathways. N Engl J Med. 2009, 360 (17): 1699-1701. 10.1056/NEJMp0808934.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Iles MM: What can genome-wide association studies tell us about the genetics of common disease?. PLoS Genet. 2008, 4 (2): e33-10.1371/journal.pgen.0040033.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Myles S, Davison D, Barrett J, Stoneking M, Timpson N: Worldwide population differentiation at disease-associated SNPs. BMC Med Genomics. 2008, 1: 22-10.1186/1755-8794-1-22.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lohmueller KE, Mauney MM, Reich D, Braverman JM: Variants associated with common disease are not unusually differentiated in frequency across populations. Am J Hum Genet. 2006, 78 (1): 130-136. 10.1086/499287.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hindorff LA, Sethupathy P, Junkins HA, Ramos EM, Mehta JP, Collins FS, Manolio TA: Potential etiologic and functional implications of genome-wide association loci for human diseases and traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 106 (23): 9362-9367. 10.1073/pnas.0903103106.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wang WYS, Barratt BJ, Clayton DG, Todd JA: Genome-wide association studies: Theoretical and practical concerns. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2005, 6 (2): 109-118. 10.1038/nrg1522.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hacia JG, Fan JB, Ryder O, Jin L, Edgemon K, Ghandour G, Mayer RA, Sun B, Hsie L, Robbins C, et al: Determination of ancestral alleles for human single-nucleotide polymorphisms using high-density oligonucleotide arrays. Nat Genet. 1999, 22 (2): 164-167. 10.1038/9674.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lohmueller KE, Pearce CL, Pike M, Lander ES, Hirschhorn JN: Meta-analysis of genetic association studies supports a contribution of common variants to susceptibility to common disease. Nat Genet. 2003, 33 (2): 177-182. 10.1038/ng1071.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang WY, Pike N: The allelic spectra of common diseases may resemble the allelic spectrum of the full genome. Med Hypotheses. 2004, 63 (4): 748-751. 10.1016/j.mehy.2003.12.057.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- HapMart. [http://hapmart.hapmap.org/BioMart/martview/]
- Frazer KA, Ballinger DG, Cox DR, Hinds DA, Stuve LL, Gibbs RA, Belmont JW, Boudreau A, Hardenbol P, Leal S, et al: A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs. Nature. 2007, 449 (7164): 851-861. 10.1038/nature06258.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rotimi CN, Jorde LB: Ancestry and disease in the age of genomic medicine. N Engl J Med. 2010, 363 (16): 1551-1558. 10.1056/NEJMra0911564.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ganapathy G, Uyenoyama MK: Site frequency spectra from genomic SNP surveys. Theor Popul Biol. 2009, 75 (4): 346-354. 10.1016/j.tpb.2009.04.003.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Nielsen R, Hubisz MJ, Clark AG: Reconstituting the frequency spectrum of ascertained single-nucleotide polymorphism data. Genetics. 2004, 168 (4): 2373-2382. 10.1534/genetics.104.031039.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Watterson GA, Guess HA: Is the most frequent allele the oldest?. Theor Popul Biol. 1977, 11 (2): 141-160. 10.1016/0040-5809(77)90023-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sherry ST, Ward MH, Kholodov M, Baker J, Phan L, Smigielski EM, Sirotkin K: dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29 (1): 308-311. 10.1093/nar/29.1.308.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Spencer CC, Deloukas P, Hunt S, Mullikin J, Myers S, Silverman B, Donnelly P, Bentley D, McVean G: The influence of recombination on human genetic diversity. PLoS Genet. 2006, 2 (9): e148-10.1371/journal.pgen.0020148.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kimura M: The number of heterozygous nucleotide sites maintained in a finite population due to steady flux of mutations. Genetics. 1969, 61 (4): 893-903.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sethupathy P, Hannenhalli S: A Tutorial of the Poisson Random Field Model in Population Genetics. Advances in Bioinformatics. 2008, 2008: Article ID 257864-10.1155/2008/257864.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mathworks: MATLAB 7. 2005, Natick, MA: The MathworksGoogle Scholar
- Choi SC, Stone EA, Kishino H, Thorne JL: Estimates of natural selection due to protein tertiary structure inform the ancestry of biallelic loci. Gene. 2008Google Scholar
- Taylor JE: The common ancestor process for a Wright-Fisher diffusion. Electron J Probab. 2007, 12: 808-847.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gauderman WJ: Sample size requirements for matched case-control studies of gene-environment interaction. Stat Med. 2002, 21 (1): 35-50. 10.1002/sim.973.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gauderman WJ, Morrison JM: QUANTO 1.2: A computer program for power and sample size calculations for genetic epidemiology studies. 2007Google Scholar
- Johnson AD, O'Donnell CJ: An open access database of genome-wide association results. BMC Med Genet. 2009, 10: 6-10.1186/1471-2350-10-6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kimura M, Ohta T: The age of a neutral mutant persisting in a finite population. Genetics. 1973, 75 (1): 199-212.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Griffiths RC, Tavaré S: The age of a mutation in a general coalescent tree. Stoch Models. 1998, 14: 273-295. 10.1080/15326349808807471.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Slatkin M, Rannala B: Estimating the age of alleles by use of intraallelic variability. Am J Hum Genet. 1997, 60 (2): 447-458.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Green R, Krause J, Briggs A, Maricic T, Stenzel U, Kircher M, Patterson N, Li H, Zhai W, Fritz M, et al: A Draft Sequence of the Neanderthal Genome. Science. 2010, 328: 710-722. 10.1126/science.1188021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bamshad M, Wooding SP: Signatures of natural selection in the human genome. Nat Rev Genet. 2003, 4 (2): 99-111. 10.1038/nrg999.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hernandez RD, Williamson SH, Bustamante CD: Context dependence, ancestral misidentification, and spurious signatures of natural selection. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24 (8): 1792-1800. 10.1093/molbev/msm108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clark AG, Hubisz MJ, Bustamante CD, Williamson SH, Nielsen R: Ascertainment bias in studies of human genome-wide polymorphism. Genome Res. 2005, 15 (11): 1496-1502. 10.1101/gr.4107905.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Brookfield JF: Q&A: promise and pitfalls of genome-wide association studies. BMC Biol. 2010, 8: 41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Zhong H, Prentice RL: Correcting "winner's curse" in odds ratios from genomewide association findings for major complex human diseases. Genet Epidemiol. 2009Google Scholar
- Eyre-Walker A: Genetic architecture of a complex trait and its implications for fitness and genome-wide association studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010, 107 (Suppl 1): 1752-1756. 10.1073/pnas.0906182107.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Dickson SP, Wang K, Krantz I, Hakonarson H, Goldstein DB: Rare variants create synthetic genome-wide associations. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8 (1): e1000294-10.1371/journal.pbio.1000294.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- McCarthy MI, Abecasis GR, Cardon LR, Goldstein DB, Little J, Ioannidis JP, Hirschhorn JN: Genome-wide association studies for complex traits: consensus, uncertainty and challenges. Nat Rev Genet. 2008, 9 (5): 356-369. 10.1038/nrg2344.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McClellan J, King MC: Genetic heterogeneity in human disease. Cell. 2010, 141 (2): 210-217. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.032.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Campbell MC, Tishkoff SA: African genetic diversity: implications for human demographic history, modern human origins, and complex disease mapping. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2008, 9: 403-433. 10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164258.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Pritchard JK, Cox NJ: The allelic architecture of human disease genes: common disease-common variant...or not?. Hum Mol Genet. 2002, 11 (20): 2417-2423. 10.1093/hmg/11.20.2417.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Neel JV: Diabetes mellitus: a 'thrifty' genotype rendered detrimental by 'progress'?. Am J Hum Genet. 1962, 14: 353-362.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Blekhman R, Man O, Herrmann L, Boyko AR, Indap A, Kosiol C, Bustamante CD, Teshima KM, Przeworski M: Natural selection on genes that underlie human disease susceptibility. Curr Biol. 2008, 18 (12): 883-889. 10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.074.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Slatkin M, Hudson RR: Pairwise comparisons of mitochondrial DNA sequences in stable and exponentially growing populations. Genetics. 1991, 129 (2): 555-562.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Griffiths RC, Tavare S: Sampling theory for neutral alleles in a varying environment. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1994, 344 (1310): 403-410. 10.1098/rstb.1994.0079.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pritchard JK, Przeworski M: Linkage disequilibrium in humans: models and data. Am J Hum Genet. 2001, 69 (1): 1-14. 10.1086/321275.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1755-8794/3/57/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.