Skip to main content

Identification of genetic risk variants for deep vein thrombosis by multiplexed next-generation sequencing of 186 hemostatic/pro-inflammatory genes



Next-generation DNA sequencing is opening new avenues for genetic association studies in common diseases that, like deep vein thrombosis (DVT), have a strong genetic predisposition still largely unexplained by currently identified risk variants. In order to develop sequencing and analytical pipelines for the application of next-generation sequencing to complex diseases, we conducted a pilot study sequencing the coding area of 186 hemostatic/proinflammatory genes in 10 Italian cases of idiopathic DVT and 12 healthy controls.


A molecular-barcoding strategy was used to multiplex DNA target capture and sequencing, while retaining individual sequence information. Genomic libraries with barcode sequence-tags were pooled (in pools of 8 or 16 samples) and enriched for target DNA sequences. Sequencing was performed on ABI SOLiD-4 platforms. We produced > 12 gigabases of raw sequence data to sequence at high coverage (average: 42X) the 700-kilobase target area in 22 individuals. A total of 1876 high-quality genetic variants were identified (1778 single nucleotide substitutions and 98 insertions/deletions). Annotation on databases of genetic variation and human disease mutations revealed several novel, potentially deleterious mutations. We tested 576 common variants in a case-control association analysis, carrying the top-5 associations over to replication in up to 719 DVT cases and 719 controls. We also conducted an analysis of the burden of nonsynonymous variants in coagulation factor and anticoagulant genes. We found an excess of rare missense mutations in anticoagulant genes in DVT cases compared to controls and an association for a missense polymorphism of FGA (rs6050; p = 1.9 × 10-5, OR 1.45; 95% CI, 1.22-1.72; after replication in > 1400 individuals).


We implemented a barcode-based strategy to efficiently multiplex sequencing of hundreds of candidate genes in several individuals. In the relatively small dataset of our pilot study we were able to identify bona fide associations with DVT. Our study illustrates the potential of next-generation sequencing for the discovery of genetic variation predisposing to complex diseases.

Peer Review reports


Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower extremities, a common thrombotic disease often complicated by acute pulmonary embolism [1], has a strong genetic component as established by family [24] and twin studies [5], with a 3-fold increase in disease risk for siblings of individuals with DVT [2] and an estimated hereditary component of 60% [3]. Genetic risk factors include rare mutations in PROC, PROS1 and SERPINC1 leading to the deficiencies of natural anticoagulant proteins (protein C, protein S and antithrombin, respectively) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of F5 (rs6025 or factor V Leiden [FVL]) and of F2 (rs1799963 or prothrombin G20210A) [6]. More recently, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) identified associations of common SNPs at 6 different genomic loci (CYP4V2, SERPINC1, GP6, F5, ABO and HIVEP1) [79]. In spite of these recent observations, however, genetic variants established to influence the risk for DVT explain only a fraction of disease heritability [10].

Next-generation DNA sequencing is opening new avenues for genetic association studies in complex diseases, enabling to sequence large fractions of the human genome (or even the entire genome) at unprecedented speed and per-base costs. Re-sequencing the exome (i.e. the protein coding area of the genome) or the entire genome is becoming the gold standard for the identification of disease-causing mutations in Mendelian diseases [1113]. However, the application of these techniques to common diseases is still limited by the high costs and considerable computational burden associated with the analysis of numerous samples. Sequencing of a few hundred genes or genomic loci is a much less expensive alternative to whole-genome (or exome) sequencing, suitable for the analysis of areas of the genome that are deemed to have particular relevance in the pathophysiology of a given disease. However, this regional sequencing approach, which requires sample multiplexing in order to achieve efficiency, is technically challenging. Multiplexing on next-generation sequencing platforms entails the use of DNA pools, which is affected by limitations in downstream genetic association analysis. These limitations include (a) loss of sensitivity to detect rare genetic variants, (b) uncertainty in allele frequency estimations determined by the unequal representation of samples within the pool, and (c) loss of individual sequence data hampering direct genotype-phenotype associations.

In this pilot study, we used genomic libraries with barcode sequence-tags as a means to overcome the limitations of pooling. Using this approach we were able to multiplex DNA-target capture and SOLiD sequencing while retaining individual sequence information. In what is one of the first practical applications of this technique, we sequenced the coding area of 186 genes involved in blood hemostasis/inflammation (i.e. two pivotal pathophysiological mechanisms of DVT) in 10 Italian patients with early-onset idiopathic DVT and 12 thrombosis-free controls. The goal of this pilot study was to develop pipelines for the application of next-generation sequencing in the setting of DVT and to test different analytical approaches for the identification of disease-associated variants.



Cases of DVT were selected from 2139 unrelated patients referred to the Angelo Bianchi Bonomi Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, Milan, (Italy) for diagnostic workout and thrombophilia testing after a first episode of DVT of the lower limbs in the years 1995-2010. Patients were asked to bring to the center the diagnostic documentation of their thrombotic episodes and underwent a clinical interview. DVT had been diagnosed by compression ultrasonography or venography. All patients underwent a complete thrombophilia screening, including measurement of natural anticoagulant proteins, genotyping of FVL and prothrombin G20210A and search for antiphospholipid autoantibodies. Coagulation factor VIII and fibrinogen coagulant activities were also measured.

A patient selection flow-chart is shown in Additional file 1 Figure S1. Patients selected for next-generation sequencing were required to have (a) history of idiopathic DVT of the lower limbs, (b) age of disease onset < 55 years, (c) wild-type FVL and prothrombin G20210A genotypes, (d) absence of natural anticoagulant deficiencies, (e) negative search for anti-phospholipid autoantibodies, (f) been born in Lombardy, the 10 million people region of Italy that has Milan as a regional capital. Since 42 patients matched these criteria, patients were further prioritized based on age of onset, familial history of venous or arterial thrombosis, completeness of clinical information, DNA amount and quality. Patients included in the replication were all the remaining 719 patients with a first episode of idiopathic lower-limb DVT and available DNA. Controls included in the study were selected from a total of 1938 healthy Italian individuals recruited among friends and non-consanguineous relatives who accompanied patients to the Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center and agreed to be tested for thrombophilia. Previous arterial or venous thrombosis in the controls was excluded using a validated questionnaire [14]. Controls had similar age of the idiopathic DVT cases (± 5 years) and the same gender. Controls who underwent next-generation sequencing were matched with the patients for geographic provenience (born in Lombardy), in order to minimize population stratification. In case more than one control matched the same patient, control inclusion was random. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico and all subjects gave their informed consent. Patient recruitment, sampling and thrombophilia screening were carried out at the Angelo Bianchi Bonomi Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, Milan (Italy). Next-generation DNA analysis and replication PCR and Sanger sequencing and associated analyses were carried out at the Human Genome Sequencing Center (HGSC), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (USA).

Target area selection

The protein coding exons, 3' and 5' UTRs, and the intron-exon boundaries of 186 genes were chosen as target area. Target genes included all coagulation factor genes, anticoagulant genes and genes involved in fibrinolysis, platelet adhesion and aggregation, cell-cell interaction, endothelial activation and inflammation. The genomic coordinate intervals corresponding to the target area were obtained from the UCSC Genome Browser database and sent to NimbleGen for probe design. Probes were designed for all of the submitted intervals, with slightly different genomic coordinates (i.e. tiled regions). The final target area spanned 644, 472 bp. Probes were arrayed on Roche NimbleGen HD2 2.1 M-probe custom chips. The complete lists of target and tiled coordinate-intervals and of the target genes are in the Additional file 2 and Additional file 1 Table S1.

Experimental design

Two experiments were carried out. In the first experiment, genomic libraries from 4 DVT patients (DVT_P_01, DVT_P_02, DVT_P_03, DVT_P_04) and 4 controls (DVT_C_01, DVT_C_02, DVT_C_03, DVT_C_04) were captured on the same Roche NimbleGen HD2 chip and sequenced in the same ABI SOLiD 4 spot (one quarter of a slide). In the second, libraries from 8 cases (DVT_P_01, DVT_P_05, DVT_P_06, DVT_P_07, DVT_P_08, DVT_P_09, DVT_P_10, DVT_P_11) and 8 controls (DVT_C_05, DVT_C_06, DVT_C_07, DVT_C_08, DVT_C_09, DVT_C_10, DVT_C_11, DVT_C_12) were captured on one Roche NimbleGen HD2 chip and sequenced in two ABI SOLiD 4 spots. Sample DVT_P_11 failed capture during the second experiment. Patient DVT_P_01 was sequenced twice as a quality control procedure.

Genomic library preparation, barcoding and enrichment of target DNA sequences

Two micrograms of genomic DNA were used to prepare libraries of DNA fragments that were ligated with ABI SOLiD P1-and P2-adaptors [15]. Different modified P2-adaptors, each containing a specific DNA-tag sequence (molecular barcode), were used for each individual library. Libraries with barcodes were used to prepare equimolar DNA pools of 8 and 16 samples. Four micrograms of DNA from each pool were hybridized on one Roche NimbleGen HD2 chip.

ABI SOLiD 4 sequencing

Capture products underwent emulsion PCR with P1-adaptor mediated attachment of clonally-amplified templates to loading beads. Beads were covalently attached on glass slides at the P2-adaptor extremity. Sequencing by oligonucleotide ligation and detection (SOLiD) was performed on ABI SOLiD 4 platforms [15].

Read barcode assignment and mapping to the reference genome

Reads with the barcodes were assigned to the corresponding sample using custom Perl scripts and mapped to reference human genome, NCBI36/hg18, using BFAST software [16]. Reads that mapped on the same starting and end coordinates, considered likely to be PCR duplicates, were marked in the binary alignment/mapping (BAM) files, where mapping information was stored.

Genetic variant calls and quality control (QC)

Sorted BAM files were processed in a variant-calling pipeline consisting of a BAM filtering process and a variant calling process. In the first step, duplicate reads were eliminated from the BAM files, retaining only the read with the top mapping quality at each pair of start and end mapping coordinates. Also, reads with mapping quality score of less than 50 were expunged from the BAM files. In the variant-calling step, Samtools [17] was used to generate PILEUP files with read information at sites where mismatches from the reference sequence were detected. Consensus in the presence of mismatches, read- and base-quality parameters were used as criteria to distinguish genetic variants from sequencing errors, filtering high-quality calls. In a final QC process, this set of calls was further cleared from variants with an allele balance (variant allele reads/total number of reference plus variant allele reads) below 20% and/or with significant strand bias (i.e. sites at which the variant sequence did not appear on both forward and reverse reads) in spite of high variant quality.

Variant annotation

Genetic variants were annotated on RefSeq database, dbSNP129 and 1000 Genomes pilot release (March 2010) [18] using Annovar software [19]. Missense variants were also annotated on SIFT [20] and Polyphen 2 [21].

Association analysis

Several pieces of software have been developed to analyze genotyping result of commercially SNP-genotyping arrays (e.g. those used for GWAS), in particular the successful PLINK package [22]. On the other hand, few tools are available for genetic association analysis of next-generation sequencing datasets. For this reason we developed Nxtgen2plink.rb, a software capable of generating PLINK-compatible input files with phenotypic information on sequenced individuals and genotype calls at each site that was found to be variable in at least one of the sequenced individuals. The software uses read alignment and coverage information (BAM files), genetic-variant calls (PILEUP files) and quality control information on variants with low quality (also in the PILEUP file format) to generate genotype calls across all individuals. Details of the workflow of the Nxtgen2plink.rb software are presented in Additional file 1 Figure S2. Association analysis was the carried out by PLINK and custom Perl and Python scripts.

In our dataset we chose to carry out (a) association analysis by Fisher's exact test of all identified variants that had at least a minor allele frequency (MAF) of 8% in the entire dataset of cases plus controls (i.e. the threshold MAF enabling a variant to reach a statistical significance with p < 0.05 given the sample size) and a genotype missingness of less than 10% and (b) 'collapsing' analysis comparing the total number of nonsynonymous single nucleotide variants (SNVs) in coagulation factor and anticoagulant protein genes in DVT cases and controls.


We chose to carry over to replication in up to 719 idiopathic DVT patients and 719 matched controls the top-5 variants from the single-variant association analysis. Replication was carried out by PCR and Sanger sequencing, which were chosen as replication techniques given the high-throughput capacity of HGSC, their accuracy and their potential to reveal neighboring genetic variation in linkage disequilibrium with or with similar effect to that of the variant undergoing replication. Genotype calls were performed automatically by SNP-detector [23] and 10% of the calls were verified manually on chromatograms. Replication comprised two stages (1) initial replication in 284 individuals (2) full replication in 1438 individuals. We selected for stage 2 variants that given their allele frequency and effect size estimated in stage 1 had 80% chances to be replicated at p < 0.005 in the entire cohort of 1438 individuals. Genetic association was carried out by PLINK. The interaction of rs6050 with FVL and prothrombin G20210A was tested using PLINK with the epistasis option. Association of rs6050 with DVT after adjustment for covariates was assessed by multivariable logistic regression using STATA 10 software.


Patient selection and characteristics

After exclusion of patients who were non-Caucasian, refused to give consent, had insufficient DNA amount or low DNA quality (n = 374), 1765 patients with lower limb DVT were included in the selection of idiopathic cases for the study. Of these, 719 patients with idiopathic DVT were further selected for the replication stage of this study and another 11 patients were chosen for next-generation sequencing after prioritizing the list of the 42 eligible patients selected on the basis of pre-specified criteria (see 'Patients' in the Methods section). Of 1938 thrombosis-free Caucasian individuals recruited at the Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center in the same period, 1703 who had available DNA were included in the selection of controls. Twelve controls underwent next-generation sequencing and 719 participated to the replication stage of the study. The individual demographic, clinical and laboratory features of the patients and controls who underwent next-generation sequencing are in Additional file 1 Table S2. Table 1 reports the characteristics of the 1438 individuals that participated to the replication stage.

Table 1 Characteristics of the individuals included in the replication stages of the study.

Sequencing statistics

To sequence the 700-kilobase target area at an average depth of coverage of 42X (after removal of duplicate reads) in 22 samples, 12,040,000,000 bp and ~240 million reads of raw sequence data were generated. Reads were mapped on the human reference genome, NCBI36/hg18, and non-duplicate reads were retained and used for genotype calls. An average of 7% of the reads mapped to the target region, corresponding to an enrichment of more than 300-fold (the target area constitutes 0.02% of the 3-gigabase human genome). On average, 98, 4% of the target was covered at least once, 91% of the target area had at least the 10X coverage required for confident variant calls and 80% had coverage > 20X indicating homogeneous high coverage of the target area. Coverage statistics and representative histograms can be found in the Additional file 1 (Table S3 and S4; Figure S3).

Type and frequency of identified genetic variants

In the 22 samples, 458 SNVs and 8 indels per individual were identified in the target region. Additional file 1 Tables S5-S7 show the characteristics and annotation of identified SNVs and indels. A total of 1778 high-quality SNVs were identified. Of these, 487 were coding nonsynonymous SNVs, which included 102 SNVs not present in dbSNP129 and 1000 Genomes pilot release. A total of 5 different nonsense variants were found (p.G2969X and p.G3170X in COL6A3; p.R412X in KNG1; p.R88X in SERPINA10 and p.R615X in ZNF544). Ninety-eight indels were called. The most frequent indel was an intronic, single-nucleotide deletion in PLCG2 (chromosome 16, coordinate 80461934). Figure 1 shows the frequency distribution of identified variants. Consistent with previous observations [11, 18], the frequency interval between one observation and 5% yielded the highest number of variants, the highest nonsynonymous/synonymous ratio and the highest SIFT-predicted-damaging/SIFT-predicted-benign ratio. To verify the validity of variant calls and QC filters we (a) repeated the sequencing of one of the samples (DVT_P_01) (b) sequenced by PCR and Sanger all 22 samples at 35 sites where a SNV was found (c) verified by Pyrosequencing 19 genotypes at sites with variants that did not pass QC. Of 425 SNVs identified after QC in DVT_P_01 at the second sequencing experiment, 405 (95.3%) had been identified also in the first sequencing run of the same sample, showing the high reproducibility of next-generation sequencing. Of 765 genotypes available from both SOLiD and Sanger sequencing, 99.8% (697/698) of homozygous wild-type genotypes and 97% (65/67) of either heterozygous or homozygous variant genotypes were in agreement. None of the variants that did not pass QC was validated by Pyrosequencing.

Figure 1

Allele frequency distribution of single nucleotide variants with different functional annotation.

Disease-associated variants in the target genes

In order to search for the presence of disease-associated genetic variants, all identified SNVs were annotated on the human gene mutation database (HGMD®), a database that includes published mutations responsible for human diseases [24]. A total of 27 variants were present in HGMD® and are listed in Additional file 1 Table S8. Of these variants, 9 had been reported in association with thrombotic diseases (either venous or arterial thrombosis) and 7 in association with DVT or DVT-associated intermediate phenotypes (i.e. obesity and von Willebrand factor [VWF] levels). Among these variants were a missense variant of CYP4V2 gene (rs13146272) reported to protect from DVT [7] (allele count in DVT cases vs controls of this study: 3 vs 6), a 5'UTR-variant of FGA gene found to increase DVT risk (rs2070011) [25] (allele count in DVT cases vs controls: 12 vs 7) and a variant reported to decrease circulating VWF levels (rs216321) [26] (i.e. expected to have a protective effect since high VWF levels increase DVT risk [27]; allele count in DVT cases vs controls: 0 vs 3).

Nonsynonymous variation in coagulation genes

Because enhanced coagulation is one of the main pathogenic mechanisms in DVT, particular attention was paid to genetic variation in coagulation factor and anticoagulant genes. A total of 127 variants were identified in 18 genes (FGA, FGB, FGG, F2, F3, F5, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11, F12, F13A, F13B, PROC, SERPINC1, PROS1, PROZ). Of these, 41 were missense variants, including 12 novel. Twelve different missense variants were identified in the large F5 gene and novel missense variants were found in FGA (3), F7 (2), F12 (2), F5 (1), SERPINC1, PROC (2) and PROZ. All missense variants identified in anticoagulant and coagulation factor genes and their functional annotation are summarized in Additional file 1 Table S9. There was no significant difference in the burden of missense variants of coagulation factor genes in DVT cases vs controls, both at single-gene level and at collapsing analysis of all coagulation genes, even when considering in the analysis only variants that were predicted to produce deleterious substitutions by Polyphen 2 or SIFT (see Additional file 1 Table S9 for detailed allele counts). By contrast, DVT cases displayed a higher number of missense variants in anticoagulant genes compared to controls (Table 2; total count of 9 in cases vs 2 in controls, average 0.9 vs 0.18; binomial distribution probability, p = 0.01). Of 5 different missense variants identified in cases, 4 were novel (conversely, only 8/36 variants identified in coagulation factor genes were novel), 3 were predicted to be potentially damaging for protein function by either Polyphen 2 or SIFT and only one (the known SNP rs3024772) was detected also in the control group, suggesting that these missense variants are rare mutations with likely deleterious effect on the encoded proteins.

Table 2 Nonsynonymous single nucleotide variants in anticoagulant genes.

Association analysis of common variants

Nxtgen2plink.rb was used to generate PLINK input files from the BAM and PILEUP files of the 22 individuals that had successfully undergone sequencing. Average SNV-genotyping success was > 90%. Across the 1778 variable sites identified in the target area, we tested 576 variants that had allele frequency of at least 8% and genotyping success > 90% in a case-control association analysis. The top-5 variants were selected for replication (listed in Table 3). Of the 5 variants taken to replication stage 1 in 284 individuals, 2 were sequenced in 719 cases of idiopathic DVT of the lower limbs and 719 controls. The variants that passed stage 1 were a low-frequency missense polymorphism of PLCG2 (rs11548656, p.H244R) and a common polymorphism of FGA (rs6050, p.T331A). While PLCG2 p.H244R had no association after sequencing in > 1400 individuals, FGA p.T331A showed a statistically significant association with DVT in a crude association analysis (p = 1.9 × 10-5, OR 1.45; 95% CI, 1.22-1.72) and after adjustment for age and gender (p = 0.0081, OR 1.39; 95% CI, 1.10-1.74). PCR and Sanger sequencing also identified 7 missense variants in addition to those targeted at these two loci (6 at FGA and 1 at PLCG2). There was no association between these variants and DVT at both single-variant and collapsing case-control association analysis. Variant features are summarized in Additional file 1 Table S10. The association of rs6050 with DVT was further tested in multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for several covariates. The association between rs6050 and DVT remained statistically significant after adjustment for age, gender and plasmatic levels of fibrinogen (p = 0.0001, OR 1.39; 95% CI, 1.10-1.74); and for age, gender, fibrinogen levels, body mass index, FVL and prothrombin G20210A (p < 0.0001, OR 1.41; 95% CI, 1.10-1.81). We also tested the interaction (i.e. deviation of the cumulative effect from an additive model) between rs6050 and FVL and between rs6050 and prothrombin G20210A. Both tests were negative (p = 0.44 for interaction with FVL and p = 0.89 for interaction with prothrombin G20210A).

Table 3 Common variant association results.


This pilot study is one of the first applications of next-generation sequencing in DVT. Sequencing by oligonucleotide ligation and detection was used to resequence the protein-coding areas of 186 hemostatic/pro-inflammatory genes in cases and controls of DVT. This regional sequencing approach enabled the simultaneous analysis of several dozens of genes in many samples at a fraction of the cost and computation required for whole-exome and whole-genome analysis. At the current level of multiplexing (i.e. up to 64 samples per SOLiD slide, 16 per spot), the analysis of our target area in one sample costs one tenth of a high-coverage exome-sequencing and one hundredth of a high-coverage whole-genome sequencing, with similar proportions in the saving of computational time (3 hours for read mapping vs the few days of whole-exome or the more than 1 week of whole-genome datasets) and information storage-capacity requirements (300 MB per BAM file vs 40 GB per BAM for whole-exome or 400 GB for whole-genome sequencing). For these reasons, regional sequencing is ideal to interrogate relatively small genomic areas deemed of particular functional relevance in a disease. Potential applications of this approach are the sequencing of positional candidate genes or genomic loci identified by genome-wide linkage or association analysis [28], the large-scale replication of the initial findings of exome and whole-genome resequencing studies and the rapid screening of disease-genes in those Mendelian diseases that have several different causal genes [29].

In the field of DVT, the importance of being able to analyze all known hemostatic genes (i.e. the 'hemostateome') has been recently highlighted by Fechtel et al. [30]. The simultaneous sequencing of all hemostatic genes in affected individuals is ideal to study specific combinations of variants in the hemostatic pathway acting in synergy to confer DVT-predisposition. This type of approach has the potential to reveal new disease-predisposing mechanisms, besides the identification of isolated variants that show statistical association with the disease. In this study, the use of molecular barcoding allowed multiplexing without loss of individual sequence information, which is required to fully exploit the potential of sequence data. Sequencing of the 186 genes in 22 individuals yielded more than 1700 genetic variants of different functional type and frequency. Annotation of identified variants revealed several disease-associated variants, a proportion of which had already been reported in association with DVT. Many novel variants with potentially deleterious effect on the function of key hemostatic proteins were also found. These results are consistent with the recent report by Dewey et al. of the genome sequence of a family quartet in which the father had a history of DVT and pulmonary embolism [31]. In the study, the authors identified four different novel nonsynonymous variants in DVT-risk genes and other known thrombophilia associated variants.

In our study, we adopted different analytical approaches to reveal potential associations with the disease at both single-variant and gene/pathway levels. Although the number of analyzed individuals was very small, it was possible to find statistically significant and biologically plausible associations with DVT. An increased burden of rare missense mutations in anticoagulant genes was found in DVT cases compared to controls. Single-variant association analysis followed by replication genotyping in > 1400 individuals identified an association for the rs6050 SNP in FGA. The excess of rare missense mutations in anticoagulant genes in patients in whom the deficiencies of natural anticoagulants had been excluded with biochemical assays suggests that a fraction of idiopathic DVT cases might be affected by 'unrecognized' anticoagulant deficiencies, caused by mutations that impart functional effects to which currently used biochemical assays are not sensitive. The association of rs6050, already described by previous candidate SNP studies, was here identified by an agnostic screening of several dozen genes. The association of rs6050 was reported in 4 studies focusing on venous thromboembolism (VTE), therefore including cases of pulmonary embolism without a diagnosis of DVT [25, 3234]. Two of these studies were very small, with total sample size (cases and controls) of less than 500 individuals [25, 32]. Ours is the second largest of all the studies on rs6050 both in terms of DVT cases investigated and overall statistical power. Thus, along with previous reports, this study makes of rs6050 one of the most widely replicated variants in DVT. The mechanisms for the association of rs6050 with DVT/VTE are not fully understood. FGA rs6050 was reported to result in enhanced coagulation factor XIII-mediated cross-linking of fibrin alpha-chain [35] and to be associated with increased FGA transcription [32]. In this report we found no association of FGA rs6050 with plasmatic fibrinogen activity, but the fact that rs6050 is a missense SNP and that the amino acid substitution is considered as 'possibly damaging' by Polyphen 2 indeed suggest that the risk for DVT is conferred by an alteration of fibrinogen-alpha chain function.


The approach proposed in this study has limitations. The use of DNA target capture may introduce bias in the detection of genetic variants by allele-selective capture. Both the use of target capture and the short-read length of next-generation sequencing platforms constrain comprehensive analysis of copy number variation (CNV), an important source of genetic variability. However, these limitations can be minimized by increasing sequence coverage and by using complementary genetic analyses (e.g. array-based CNV-ascertainment). Restricting the analysis to a few hundred candidate genes may limit the chance to detect novel associations. On the other hand, the efficiency and cost effectiveness of regional sequencing are ideal for the thorough, large-scale analysis of genetic variation in specific biological pathways such as hemostasis. This approach may provide deep understanding of the mechanisms by which multiple variants in the same biological pathway shape individual predisposition to complex phenotypes.


Using a molecular-barcode based technique for sample multiplexing on next-generation DNA sequencing platforms we sequenced the coding areas of 186 hemostatic/proinflammatory genes in cases and controls of DVT. We were able to detect known disease-associated variants as well as novel potentially-deleterious variants in disease-associated genes. Our results illustrate the potential of next-generation gene sequencing for the discovery of genetic variation predisposing to common diseases and for the study of inherited thrombophilia.


  1. 1.

    Tapson VF: Acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2008, 358: 1037-52. 10.1056/NEJMra072753.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sørensen HT, Riis AH, Diaz LJ, Andersen EW, Baron JA, Andersen PK: Familial risk of venous thromboembolism: a nationwide cohort study. J Thromb Haemost. 2011, 9: 320-4. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.04129.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Souto JC, Almasy L, Borrell M, Blanco-Vaca F, Mateo J, Soria JM, Coll I, Felices R, Stone W, Fontcuberta J, Blangero J: Genetic susceptibility to thrombosis and its relationship to physiological risk factors: the GAIT study. Genetic Analysis of Idiopathic Thrombophilia. Am J Hum Genet. 2000, 67: 1452-9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Heit JA, Phelps MA, Ward SA, Slusser JP, Petterson TM, De Andrade M: Familial segregation of venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2004, 2: 731-6. 10.1111/j.1538-7933.2004.00660.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Larsen TB, Sørensen HT, Skytthe A, Johnsen SP, Vaupel JW, Christensen K: Major genetic susceptibility for venous thromboembolism in men: a study of Danish twins. Epidemiology. 2003, 14: 328-32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Dahlbäck B: Advances in understanding pathogenic mechanisms of thrombophilic disorders. Blood. 2008, 112: 19-27. 10.1182/blood-2008-01-077909.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bezemer ID, Bare LA, Doggen CJ, Arellano AR, Tong C, Rowland CM, Catanese J, Young BA, Reitsma PH, Devlin JJ, Rosendaal FR: Gene variants associated with deep vein thrombosis. JAMA. 2008, 299: 1306-14. 10.1001/jama.299.11.1306.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Trégouët DA, Heath S, Saut N, Biron-Andreani C, Schved JF, Pernod G, Galan P, Drouet L, Zelenika D, Juhan-Vague I, Alessi MC, Tiret L, Lathrop M, Emmerich J, Morange PE: Common susceptibility alleles are unlikely to contribute as strongly as the FV and ABO loci to VTE risk: results from a GWAS approach. Blood. 2009, 113: 5298-303. 10.1182/blood-2008-11-190389.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Morange PE, Bezemer I, Saut N, Bare L, Burgos G, Brocheton J, Durand H, Biron-Andreani C, Schved JF, Pernod G, Galan P, Drouet L, Zelenika D, Germain M, Nicaud V, Heath S, Ninio E, Delluc A, Münzel T, Zeller T, Brand-Herrmann SM, Alessi MC, Tiret L, Lathrop M, Cambien F, Blankenberg S, Emmerich J, Trégouët DA, Rosendaal FR: A follow-up study of a genome-wide association scan identifies a susceptibility locus for venous thrombosis on chromosome 6p24.1. Am J Hum Genet. 2010, 86: 592-5. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.02.011.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Morange PE, Tregouet DA: Deciphering the molecular basis of venous thromboembolism: where are we and where should we go?. Br J Haematol. 2010, 148: 495-506. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07975.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ng SB, Turner EH, Robertson PD, Flygare SD, Bigham AW, Lee C, Shaffer T, Wong M, Bhattacharjee A, Eichler EE, Bamshad M, Nickerson DA, Shendure J: Targeted capture and massively parallel sequencing of 12 human exomes. Nature. 2009, 461: 272-6. 10.1038/nature08250.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ng SB, Buckingham KJ, Lee C, Bigham AW, Tabor HK, Dent KM, Huff CD, Shannon PT, Jabs EW, Nickerson DA, Shendure J, Bamshad MJ: Exome sequencing identifies the cause of a mendelian disorder. Nat Genet. 2010, 42: 30-5. 10.1038/ng.499.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lupski JR, Reid JG, Gonzaga-Jauregui C, Rio Deiros D, Chen DC, Nazareth L, Bainbridge M, Dinh H, Jing C, Wheeler DA, McGuire AL, Zhang F, Stankiewicz P, Halperin JJ, Yang C, Gehman C, Guo D, Irikat RK, Tom W, Fantin NJ, Muzny DM, Gibbs RA: Whole-genome sequencing in a patient with Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy. N Engl J Med. 2010, 362: 1181-91. 10.1056/NEJMoa0908094.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Frezzato M, Tosetto A, Rodeghiero F: Validated questionnaire for the identification of previous personal or familial venous thromboembolism. Am J Epidemiol. 1996, 143: 1257-65.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.


  16. 16.

    Homer N, Merriman B, Nelson SF: BFAST: An alignment tool for large scale genome resequencing. PLoS ONE. 2009, 4: e7767-10.1371/journal.pone.0007767.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup: The Sequence alignment/map (SAM) format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009, 25: 2078-9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    1000 Genomes Project Consortium, Durbin RM, Abecasis GR, Altshuler DL, Auton A, Brooks LD, Durbin RM, Gibbs RA, Hurles ME, McVean GA: A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature. 2010, 467: 1061-73. 10.1038/nature09534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wang K, Li M, Hakonarson H: ANNOVAR: Functional annotation of genetic variants from next-generation sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Research. 2010, 38: e164-10.1093/nar/gkq603.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ng PC, Henikoff S: Accounting for human polymorphisms predicted to affect protein function. Genome Res. 2002, 12: 436-46. 10.1101/gr.212802.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, Kondrashov AS, Sunyaev SR: A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods. 2010, 7: 248-249. 10.1038/nmeth0410-248.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D, Maller J, Sklar P, de Bakker PI, Daly MJ, Sham PC: PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007, 81: 559-75. 10.1086/519795.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Zhang J, Wheeler DA, Yakub I, Wei S, Sood R, Rowe W, Liu PP, Gibbs RA, Buetow KH: SNPdetector: a software tool for sensitive and accurate SNP detection. PLoS Comput Biol. 2005, 1: e53-10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010053.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Stenson PD, Mort M, Ball EV, Howells K, Phillips AD, Thomas NS, Cooper DN: The Human Gene Mutation Database: 2008 update. Genome Med. 2009, 1: 13-10.1186/gm13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ko YL, Hsu LA, Hsu TS, Tsai CT, Teng MS, Wu S, Chang CJ, Lee YS: Functional polymorphisms of FGA, encoding alpha fibrinogen, are associated with susceptibility to venous thromboembolism in a Taiwanese population. Hum Genet. 2006, 119: 84-91. 10.1007/s00439-005-0102-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Vaidya D, Yanek LR, Herrera-Galeano JE, Mathias RA, Moy TF, Faraday N, Becker LC, Becker DM: A common variant in the Von Willebrand factor gene is associated with multiple functional consequences. Am J Hematol. 2010, 85: 971-3. 10.1002/ajh.21859.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Smith NL, Rice KM, Bovill EG, Cushman M, Bis JC, McKnight B, Lumley T, Glazer NL, van Hylckama Vlieg A, Tang W, Dehghan A, Strachan DP, O'Donnell CJ, Rotter JI, Heckbert SR, Psaty BM, Rosendaal FR: Genetic variation associated with plasma von Willebrand factor levels and the risk of incident venous thrombosis. Blood. 2011, 117: 6007-11. 10.1182/blood-2010-10-315473.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Momozawa Y, Mni M, Nakamura K, Coppieters W, Almer S, Amininejad L, Cleynen I, Colombel JF, de Rijk P, Dewit O, Finkel Y, Gassull MA, Goossens D, Laukens D, Lémann M, Libioulle C, O'Morain C, Reenaers C, Rutgeerts P, Tysk C, Zelenika D, Lathrop M, Del-Favero J, Hugot JP, de Vos M, Franchimont D, Vermeire S, Louis E, Georges M: Resequencing of positional candidates identifies low frequency IL23R coding variants protecting against inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Genet. 2011, 43: 43-7. 10.1038/ng.733.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Shearer AE, DeLuca AP, Hildebrand MS, Taylor KR, Gurrola J, Scherer S, Scheetz TE, Smith RJ: Comprehensive genetic testing for hereditary hearing loss using massively parallel sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010, 107: 21104-9. 10.1073/pnas.1012989107.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Fechtel K, Osterbur ML, Kehrer-Sawatzki H, Stenson PD, Cooper DN: Delineating the Hemostaseome as an aid to individualize the analysis of the hereditary basis of thrombotic and bleeding disorders. Hum Genet. 2011, 130: 149-66. 10.1007/s00439-011-0984-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Dewey FE, Chen R, Cordero SP, Ormond KE, Caleshu C, Karczewski KJ, Whirl-Carrillo M, Wheeler MT, Dudley JT, Byrnes JK, Cornejo OE, Knowles JW, Woon M, Sangkuhl K, Gong L, Thorn CF, Hebert JM, Capriotti E, David SP, Pavlovic A, West A, Thakuria JV, Ball MP, Zaranek AW, Rehm HL, Church GM, West JS, Bustamante CD, Snyder M, Altman RB, Klein TE, Butte AJ, Ashley EA: Phased whole-genome genetic risk in a family quartet using a major allele reference sequence. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7: e1002280-10.1371/journal.pgen.1002280.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Carter AM, Catto AJ, Kohler HP, Ariëns RA, Stickland MH, Grant PJ: alpha-fibrinogen Thr312Ala polymorphism and venous thromboembolism. Blood. 2000, 96 (3): 1177-9. Aug 1

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Rasmussen-Torvik LJ, Cushman M, Tsai MY, Zhang Y, Heckbert SR, Rosamond WD, Folsom AR: The association of alpha-fibrinogen Thr312Ala polymorphism and venous thromboembolism in the LITE study. Thromb Res. 2007, 121: 1-7. 10.1016/j.thromres.2007.02.008.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Arellano AR, Bezemer ID, Tong CH, Catanese JJ, Devlin JJ, Reitsma PH, Bare LA, Rosendaal FR: Gene variants associated with venous thrombosis: confirmation in the MEGA study. J Thromb Haemost. 2010, 8: 1132-4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Standeven KF, Grant PJ, Carter AM, Scheiner T, Weisel JW, Ariëns RA: Functional analysis of the fibrinogen alpha Thr312Ala polymorphism: effects on fibrin structure and function. Circulation. 2003, 107: 2326-30. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000066690.89407.CE.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

  1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

Download references


The authors would like to thank Dr. Luigi F Ghilardini for the help in drafting figures and tables, all the former and current members of HGSC MedSeq and Library laboratories for sample analysis, Kyle Chang, Jennifer Drummond and Nipun Kakkar for help in genetic variant calling and annotation, Yu-Ye Wen for help in study design. FP is recipient of Bayer Hemophilia Special Project Award 2011. LAL is recipient of the Bayer Hemophilia Clinical Training Award 2009 and of the Associazione Italiana Centri Emofilia (AICE) - De Biasi Prize. Financial support from the Italian Ministry of Health (Grant n. RF-2009-1530493) is gratefully acknowledged. This work has been supported by Fondazione Cariplo (Grant n. 2011-0524).

Author information



Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Richard A Gibbs or Flora Peyvandi.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

LAL, RAG and FP designed the research. LAL, YW, DMM and MW designed the experiments. IM, SMP, EP, MM, FP and PMM gathered samples and clinical information. LAL, DC, MNB, JY and FY analyzed the data. LAL, JY and FY wrote study-specific software. LAL, EP, MM, SES, LLL, HA conducted experiments and handled samples. LAL wrote the bulk of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lotta, L.A., Wang, M., Yu, J. et al. Identification of genetic risk variants for deep vein thrombosis by multiplexed next-generation sequencing of 186 hemostatic/pro-inflammatory genes. BMC Med Genomics 5, 7 (2012).

Download citation


  • Deep vein thrombosis
  • venous thromboembolism
  • next-generation sequencing
  • target capture
  • multiplexing
  • FGA
  • rs6025
  • heamostateome
  • DVT
  • VTE