Skip to main content
Download PDF

The circular RNA hsa_circ_000780 as a potential molecular diagnostic target for gastric cancer

BMC Medical Genomics volume 14, Article number: 282 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The present study aimed to identify a specific circular RNA (circRNA) for early diagnosis of gastric cancer (GC).

Methods

Totally 82 patients with GC, 30 with chronic nonatrophic gastritis and 30 with chronic atrophic gastritis were included in this study. Four of the 82 GC patients were selected for screening. Total RNA from malignant and adjacent tissue samples was extracted, and circRNAs in four patients were screened. According to the screening results, the eight most upregulated and downregulated circRNAs with a statistically significant association with GC were identified by real-time fluorescent quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Then, the most regulated circRNA was selected for further sensitivity and specificity assessments. CircRNA expression was examined by quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR in 78 GC (21 and 57 early and advanced GC, respectively) and adjacent tissue samples, as well as in gastric fluid samples from 30 patients with chronic nonatrophic gastritis, 30 with chronic atrophic gastritis, and 78 GC.

Results

A total of 445 circRNAs, including 69 upregulated and 376 downregulated circRNAs, showed significantly altered expression in GC tissue samples. Hsa_circ_000780 was significantly downregulated in 80.77% of GC tissue samples, with levels in GC tissue samples correlating with tumor size, tumor stage, T stage, venous invasion, carcinoembryonic antigen amounts, and carbohydrate antigen 19–9 levels. Strikingly, this circRNA was found in the gastric fluid of patients with early and advanced GC.

Conclusions

The present study uncovered a new circRNA expression profile in human GC, with hsa_circ_000780 significantly downregulated in GC tissue and gastric fluid specimens. These findings indicate that hsa_circ_000780 should be considered a novel biomarker for early GC screening.

Peer Review reports

Background

Gastric cancer (GC) ranks third in global cancer mortality, and is the most common cause of cancer deaths in China [1]. As GC is difficult to diagnose in the early stage, it is crucial to develop a noninvasive molecular diagnostic tool for GC detection [2]. Presently, the gold standard for early diagnosis of GC is gastroscopy. However, China has a large population, with inadequate awareness of cancer prevention and low compliance of gastroscopy screening; in addition, the number of digestive endoscopists cannot meet the needs of the general population for gastroscopy screening [3]. In recent years, robust advances in human genome sequencing, epigenetics, circular RNA (circRNA) assessment tools, and other molecular biological techniques have enabled the search for molecular diagnostic targets for GC. Gene molecular targets are widely distributed in the human body (blood, urine, feces, and various body fluids); additionally, the samples are easily obtainable, and the detection technology is mature. Among the various methods for studying gene mutations, circRNAs are a promising target for the molecular diagnosis of GC [4,5,6,7,8,9].

CircRNAs are closed circular genetic structures with no 3′-end poly-A structure and 5′-an end cap structure [10]. They range from hundreds to thousands of base pairs in length, and are not degraded by RNA exonuclease; circRNAs are stable in nature and exist widely in the biological community, with evolutionary conservatism [11]. Studies have reported that while circRNAs are widely considered miRNA sponges [12], not many of them own more predicted miR-binding sites than expected [13, 14]. Recent studies have shown abnormal circRNA expression in various tumor cells affects tumor occurrence, proliferation, and invasion [15,16,17]. Due to the stability of circular RNAs, they have been increasing investigated as potential tumor markers in recent years [18,19,20], especially in GC [21]. Scientist have observed that circ_002059, circ_0000745, circ_00000181, circ_0047905, circ_0014717, circ_0001017, and circ_0061276 are significantly downregulated in patients with GC, with good sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of GC [21,22,23,24,25,26]. However, no report has assessed circ_000780. Additionally, the role of microRNAs has been highlighted in the development and maintenance of drug resistance in GC, which is the most critical cause of GC treatment failure. CircRNAs act as miRNA sponges and affect gene regulation and expression [27, 28]. Although the global circRNA expression profile in human GC continues to be investigated, no circRNA with a clinical value in GC has been reported. Moreover, the role of circRNAs in early diagnosis of GC is not fully understood. Therefore, the present study aimed to identify a specific circRNA for early diagnosis of GC.

Methods

Sample collection

A total of 82 patients with GC admitted to the Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Hainan Medical College and examined in the endoscopy center from January 2017 to December 2018 were recruited in this study after institutional ethics clearance. Inclusion criterial were: (1) < 80 years of age; (2) complete clinical data available; (3) scheduled selective GC surgery; (4) no previous chemotherapy besides adjuvant treatment before operation; (5) no active gastrointestinal bleeding or obstruction. Exclusion criteria were: (1) uncontrolled diabetes or hypertension, coronary heart disease, stroke, cardiovascular, and/or cerebrovascular diseases; (2) severe underlying diseases such as pulmonary, liver, and/or kidney dysfunctions; (3) requiring resection of other organs. Of the 82 patients, four were selected for the circRNA chip screening study. They included two men (one with T3N1M0, moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma; one with T3N2M0, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma) and two women (one with T3N1M0, moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma; one with T3N2M0, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma). The average age, weight, and height of the four patients were 56.7 years, 58.3 kg, and 168 cm, respectively. The remaining 78 patients with GC (Table 1) were selected for endoscopic biopsy and gastric fluid sample collection. These patients were included in the validation study of differential circRNA expression. The diagnostic criteria for early GC (EGC) and advanced GC (AGC) were based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guidelines in oncology (version 3.2016). Additionally, 30 patients with chronic nonatrophic gastritis (CNAG) and 30 with chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) were randomly selected as the control group. The diagnostic criteria for CNAG and CAG were according to the consensus opinion of the 2012 Chinese Chronic Gastritis of Gastroenterology Branch of the Chinese Medical Association.

Table 1 Patient features
Full size table

GC specimens were obtained by cutting 0.5 cm3 of the whole layer of the GC tissue, whereas paracancerous tissue specimens were obtained by cutting 0.5 cm3 of the mucosa at least 5 cm away from the tumor body. The samples were separated from the body, quickly sliced to the required size, placed into storage tubes and stored in liquid nitrogen.

Endoscopic tissue and gastric juice samples were extracted from 78 patients with GC (21 patients with EGC and 57 with AGC), 30 with CNAG, and 30 with CAG. Table 1 illustrates the baseline characteristics of the patient and control groups. All specimens were collected and pretreated according to a previously described protocol and preserved at − 80 °C until RNA extraction [29].

Total RNA extraction and reverse transcription

Total RNA from tissue and gastric fluid samples were extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Life Technologies Inc., Germany). RNA concentration was measured by reading absorbance at 260 nm (OD260) on a NanoDrop ND-1000 instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, DE, USA). RNA integrity was verified by denaturing agarose gel electrophoresis. Finally, total RNA was transcribed into cDNA through the GoScript Reverse Transcription (RT) system (Promega, WI, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol.

Microarray hybridization of circRNAs

GC tissue samples and matched adjacent noncancerous tissue specimens were selected for circRNA expression profiling using Human circRNA Array v2 (Arraystar, MD, USA). Total RNA was digested with RNase R (20 U/μL, Epicentre, Inc., Madison, WI, USA) to remove linear RNAs and enrich circRNAs. The enriched circRNAs were amplified and transcribed into fluorescent cRNA by the random priming method (Super RNA Labelling Kit; Arraystar). Labeled cRNAs were hybridized onto Human circRNA Array v2 (8 × 15 K, Arraystar). Slides were incubated for 17 h at 65 °C in a hybridization oven (Agilent, CA, USA). After washing the slides, the arrays were scanned on an Agilent Scanner (G2505C). The scanned images were then imported into the Agilent Feature Extraction software for grid alignment and data extraction. Quantile normalization and subsequent data processing were performed with the R software package. The expression profile of circRNAs, identified through volcano plot filtering between GC and paired adjacent noncancerous tissue samples, was statistically significant [fold change (FC) ≥ 2.0 and P ≤ 0.05]. Hierarchical clustering was performed to depict the distinguishable expression pattern of circRNAs among samples. The circRNA/microRNA interaction was predicted using TargetScan [30] & miRanda [31].

Quantitative reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction

The eight most upregulated and downregulated circRNAs exhibiting the greatest differences in expression between groups were selected for quantitative reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (qRT–PCR) verification in the four GC specimens and their adjacent tissues. qRT–PCR was performed with GoTaq qPCR Master Mix (Promega) on an Mx3005P Real-Time PCR System (Stratagene, CA, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocols. Divergent primers of the top eight upregulated and downregulated circRNAs and convergent primers of β-actin (H) were designed and synthesized by Aksomics (Shanghai) Biotechnology Co. Ltd. The divergent primers could only amplify circRNA and differentiate contaminants from the linear isoforms. Table 2 lists the circRNA primer sequences used for this procedure.

Table 2 Primer sequences for the assessed circRNAs
Full size table

RT-PCR was performed as follows: 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s and 60 °C for 60 s for amplification; annealing at 95 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 60 s, and 95 °C for 15 s with slow heating from 60 to 99 °C (at 0.05 °C/s).

The target and housekeeping genes in each sample were analyzed by RT-PCR. According to the gradient dilution DNA standard curve, the expression levels of the target and housekeeping genes in each sample were directly generated on an Applied Biosystems ViiA™ 7 Real-Time PCR System (ThermoFisher Scientific, USA). Target gene concentration in each sample divided by that of the housekeeping gene was considered the relative expression level of the gene.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with the SPSS 22.0 software (SPSS, IL, USA). When comparing the GC and paired noncancerous tissue groups for profile differences, the “FC” (ratio of group averages) between the groups for each circRNA was computed. The statistical significance of the difference was estimated by the t test. CircRNAs with FCs ≥ 2.0 were considered to be significantly differentially expressed. The analysis outputs were filtered, and differentially expressed circRNAs were ranked according to characteristics such as FC value, P value, and chromosome location. Differences in hsa_circ_000780 levels between the GC and paired adjacent noncancerous tissues were assessed by the t test for paired data; multiple groups (CNAG, CAG, EGC, and AGC) were assessed by one-way analysis of variance with post-hoc LSD test. Correlations between hsa_circ_000780 levels and clinicopathological factors were further analyzed by the Analyze–Correlate–Bivariate menu of SPSS 22.0. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Profiles of circRNAs in GC

A total of 13,617 circRNAs were detected in the assessed GC and paired noncancerous samples by circRNA microarray analysis. Among them, 445 circRNAs were aberrantly expressed with statistical significance (P < 0.05 and FC > 2.0) between the GC and paired noncancerous tissues. FC filtering (Fig. 1a) or volcano plot filtering (Fig. 1b) was used to identify circRNAs whose differential expression was statistically significant. Hierarchical clustering was performed to depict the differential circRNA expression pattern among samples (Fig. 1c). Of the 445 circRNAs, 69 (15.51%) were significantly upregulated and 376 (84.49%) were significantly downregulated. The eight most upregulated and downregulated circRNAs, respectively, which were screened out and then validated in 4 pairs of gastric cancer and adjacent tissue samples are listed in Table 3. The expression of hsa_circ_000780 was the most altered in cancer tissue samples versus adjacent tissue specimens (P = 0.001240).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The circRNA expression profiles in GC and paired adjacent noncancerous tissues. a Scatter plots were used to compare circRNA expression levels between GC and paired adjacent noncancerous tissues. b Volcano plots were used to visualize the differential expression of circRNAs between GC and paired adjacent noncancerous tissues. The red and green points in the plot represent the differentially expressed circRNAs with statistical significance. c Hierarchical cluster analysis of circRNAs expressed in GC (red bar) and paired adjacent noncancerous (blue bars) samples

Full size image
Table 3 The eight most upregulated and eight most downregulated circRNAs in GC
Full size table

Expression of hsa_circ_000780 in GC

The sample size in this study was expanded to 78 patients with GC and their matched adjacent noncancerous tissues to verify the accuracy of the above microarray and qRT–PCR data. The expression levels of hsa_circ_000780 in these tissues were measured by qRT–PCR. The relative expression levels of hsa_circ_000780 in GC and matched adjacent noncancerous tissue samples were 6.87 × 10–4 ± 3.12 × 10–4 and 11.67 × 10–4 ± 2.29 × 10–4, respectively (P < 0.001). The distribution of hsa_circ_000780 is shown in Fig. 2. Taking the mean value of hsa_circ_000780 expression in paracancerous tissues as the critical value for GC diagnosis, hsa_circ_000780 expression was considered to be low in 80.77% (63/78) of GC specimens, versus only 7.69% (6/78) in the paracancerous group.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Relative level distribution of hsa_circ_000780 in GC and adjacent tissue specimens

Full size image

The PPV and NPV were 91.3% and 82.76%, respectively. Moreover, bioinformatics analysis predicted that hsa_circ_000780 could interact with hsa_miRNA_522-3p, hsa_miRNA_381-3p, hsa_miRNA_300, and hsa_miRNA_15a-3p (Fig. 3). Subsequently, correlations between hsa_circ_000780 expression and clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed. As shown in Table 4, hsa_circ_000780 expression levels in GC tissue samples were significantly correlated with tumor size (P = 0.020), tumor stage (P = 0.001), T stage (P = 0.029), venous invasion (P = 0.042), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels (P = 0.001), and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels (P = 0.001). However, they were not significantly associated with other clinicopathological factors such as sex, age, tumor location, pathological diagnosis, lymphatic metastasis, distal metastasis, and cell differentiation (P > 0.05).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Bioinformatics analysis predicting hsa_circ_000780 interaction with A hsa_miR_522-3p, B hsa_miR_381-3p, C hsa_miR_300, and D hsa_miR_15a-3p

Full size image
Table 4 Associations of hsa_circ_000780 levels with clinicopathological characteristics in GC
Full size table

Amounts of hsa_circ_000780 in gastric juice specimens

Next, hsa_circ_000780 levels in gastric fluid samples from 30 patients with CNAG, 30 with CAG, 21 with EGC, and 57 with AGC were assessed by qRT–PCR. The values for the CNAG, CAG, EGC, and AGC groups were (15.63 ± 2.44) × 10–4, (12.59 ± 2.13) × 10–4, (4.28 ± 0.98) × 10–4, and (4.39 ± 1.15) × 10–4, respectively (Fig. 4). The expression levels of hsa_circ_000780 significantly differed in the CNAG and CAG groups compared with the EGC and AGC groups (P < 0.001). The hsa_circ_000780 levels were significantly decreased in the gastric fluid of the GC group. No significant difference in hsa_circ_000780 levels was found between the AGC and EGC groups (P > 0.05) or between the CNAG and CAG groups (P > 0.05). Taking the mean value of hsa_circ_000780 expression in CNAG, CAG and GC gastric juice specimens as the critical level for GC diagnosis, hsa_circ_000780 expression was considered to be low in 100% (78/78) of GC juice specimens, versus 0% (0/60) in the gastritis group. The PPV and NPV were both 100%.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Relative expression levels of hsa_circ_000780 in gastric juice samples. Hsa_circ_000780 levels in the gastric juice at various stages of GC, including CNAG (n = 30), CAG (n = 30), EGC (n = 21), and AGC (n = 57), were detected by qRT-PCR (***P < 0.001)

Full size image

Discussion

Several studies have demonstrated the involvement of circRNAs in the proliferation, apoptosis, invasion, and metastasis of human tumors [21, 26, 32]. Huang et al. [33] reported 16 upregulated and 84 downregulated circRNAs in GC. Of these, only hsa_circ_0000026 was downregulated by a fold change of 2.8 in GC as detected by qRT-PCR, and this difference was significant. Dang et al. [34] examined the expression profiles of five pairs of GC and matched non-GC tissues, and found 713 differentially expressed circRNAs in GC, including 191 and 522 upregulated and downregulated, respectively. Shen et al. [32] performed circRNA microarray analysis and stated that 347 upregulated and 603 downregulated circRNAs were observed in GC compared with normal gastric tissue. Of 20 randomly selected circRNAs, 10 were confirmed to have differential expression. The circRNA microarray results in the present study revealed a new circRNA expression profile in human GC, and the differentially expressed circRNAs detected above showed a significant difference compared with those reported in other studies [26, 34]. This study showed that 445 circRNAs were significantly dysregulated in GC. Of these, 15.51% were upregulated and 84.49% were downregulated. The trend of downregulated circRNA expression observed in this study was similar to that reported in other studies. However, through reverse verification in GC tissues and paired adjacent tissues, the expression levels of has_circ_000780, has_circ_047478, has_ circ_404798 and has_circ_104293 were significantly different. A literature search of the PubMed database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PubMed/) until November 8, 2019 did not retrieve these circRNAs in GC. These results suggested the genetic heterogeneity of GC. In addition, most differentially expressed circRNAs in this study were found on human chr1, chr3, chr4, chr6, and chr11. Shao et al. [26] observed that the differentially expressed circRNAs were mainly transcribed from chr1 and chr3, suggesting that despite the great heterogeneity in the genetic mechanism of GC, there are overlaps in the expression of circRNAs. This finding may provide a direction for further investigation of GC pathogenesis and diagnostic targets.

The circRNA expression profiles in GC further confirmed that circRNAs are closely associated with GC. However, only few circRNAs have been shown to regulate carcinogenesis in GC [35,36,37,38]. In the present study, hsa_circ_000780 was selected as a target circRNA to validate the accuracy of microarray results. The results revealed that hsa_circ_000780 was significantly downregulated in 80.77% of GC tissue samples. Bioinformatics analysis predicted that hsa_circ_000780 could interact with hsa_miRNA_522-3p, hsa_miRNA_381-3p, hsa_miRNA_300, and hsa_miRNA_15a-3p. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of small noncoding RNAs of 20–22 nucleotides in length, which play an important role in regulating gene expression by directly binding to the 3’-untranslated regions (3’-UTRs) of target mRNAs [39]. It has been demonstrated in a number of studies that miRNAs are among the pivotal factors in many biological processes, including cell differentiation, cell proliferation, apoptosis, and energy metabolism [40]. Moreover, recent studies have revealed that miRNAs play a dual role in oncology either by enhancing carcinogenesis through inhibiting tumor suppressors or acting as tumor suppressors to downregulate oncogenes. MiR-522-3p up-regulation negatively regulates BLM, with upregulation of c-myc, CDK2 and cyclin E, thereby promoting the proliferation of human CRC cells [41]. MiR-522-3p is an oncogene in glioblastoma by targeting SFRP2 through the Wnt/β-catenin pathway [42]. The miR-381-3p/RAB2A axis induces cell proliferation and inhibits cell apoptosis in bladder cancer [43]. MiR-381-3p targeted and suppressed the NASP gene, and reduced viability, migration, invasion and EMT in HNSCC cells [44]. MiR-300/FA2H affects gastric cancer cell proliferation and apoptosis. The OIP5-AS1/miR-300/YY1 feedback loop facilitates cell growth in HCC by activating the WNT pathway [45, 46]. MiR-15a-3p may contribute to adenoma-to-carcinoma progression. MiR-15a-3p and miR-16–1-3p negatively regulate Twist1 to repress gastric cancer cell invasion and metastasis [47, 48]. The literature suggests that circular RNAs can regulate the occurrence, growth and metastasis of tumors through a variety of signaling pathways. Additionally, hsa_circ_000780 expression levels in GC were significantly associated with tumor size, stage, degree of invasion, and CEA and CA19-9 expression levels, suggesting that hsa_circ_000780 has the potential to predict clinical prognosis. The gastric juice is a good sample for use in the diagnosis of gastric diseases. In the present study, we further evaluated the expression of hsa_circ_000780 in gastric juice samples from patients with CNAG, CAG, EGC, and AGC. Although hsa_circ_000780 levels in the gastric juice of GC patients were obviously decreased, there was no significant difference between the EGC and AGC groups. This finding indicates that hsa_circ_000780 could be detected in the gastric juice, and has the potential for use as a biomarker for early GC screening.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the present study found a new expression profile of circRNAs in GC. Among the circRNAs detected, hsa_circ_000780 was significantly downregulated in GC, suggesting that it might be involved in the occurrence of GC. The level of this circRNA was related to some clinicopathological characteristics of GC patients. However, its role and mechanism in the occurrence of GC must be further investigated. Interestingly, hsa_circ_000780 could be detected in the gastric juice in early GC, with a significant difference compared with the control group. Therefore, this circRNA has the potential to be used as a novel biomarker for the screening of early GC. However, the sample size of the current study was not large enough, and the research conclusions still need to be further verified.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the [GEO, GSE184882] repository, [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gds/?term=GSE184882/].

Abbreviations

circRNA:

Circular RNA

GC:

Gastric cancer

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

EGC:

Early gastric cancer

AGC:

Advanced gastric cancer

NCCN:

National Comprehensive Cancer Network

CNAG:

Chronic nonatrophic gastritis

RT:

Reverse Transcription

FC:

Fold change

qRT-PCR:

Quantitative reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction

References

  1. 1.

    Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Yao K, Uedo N, Kamada T, Hirasawa T, Nagahama T, Yoshinaga S, Oka M, Inoue K, Mabe K, Yao T, et al. Guidelines for endoscopic diagnosis of early gastric cancer. Dig Endosc. 2020;32(5):663–98.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Cai Q, Zhu C, Yuan Y, Feng Q, Feng Y, Hao Y, Li J, Zhang K, Ye G, Ye L, et al. Gastrointestinal Early Cancer Prevention & Treatment Alliance of China (GECA). Development and validation of a prediction rule for estimating gastric cancer risk in the Chinese high-risk population: a nationwide multicentre study. Gut. 2019;68(9):1576–87.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Majewski IJ, Kluijt I, Cats A, Scerri TS, de Jong D, Kluin RJC, Hansford S, Hogervorst FBL, Bosma AJ, Hofland I, et al. An α-E-catenin (CTNNA1) mutation in hereditary diffuse gastric cancer. J Pathol. 2013;229(4):621–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Park H, Cho S-Y, Kim H, Na D, Han JY, Chae J, Park C, Park O-K, Min S, Kang J, et al. Genomic alterations in BCL2L1 and DLC1 contribute to drug sensitivity in gastric cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(40):12492–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wang Z, Dai J, Hu N, Miao X, Abnet CC, Yang M, Freedman ND, Chen J, Burdette L, Zhu X, et al. Identification of new susceptibility loci for gastric non-cardia adenocarcinoma: pooled results from two Chinese genome-wide association studies. Gut. 2017;66(4):581–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Song M-y, Pan K-f, Su H-j, Zhang L, Ma J-l, Li J-y, Yuasa Y, Kang D, Kim YS, You W-c. Identification of serum microRNAs as novel non-invasive biomarkers for early detection of gastric cancer. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(3):e33608–e33608.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Huang Y-K, Yu J-C. Circulating microRNAs and long non-coding RNAs in gastric cancer diagnosis: an update and review. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(34):9863–86.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Yang Z, Guo X, Li G, Shi Y, Li L. Long noncoding RNAs as potential biomarkers in gastric cancer: opportunities and challenges. Cancer Lett. 2016;371(1):62–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Patop IL, Wüst S, Kadener S. Past, present, and future of circRNAs. EMBO J. 2019;38(16):e100836.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Memczak S, Jens M, Elefsinioti A, Torti F, Krueger J, Rybak A, Maier L, Mackowiak SD, Gregersen LH, Munschauer M, et al. Circular RNAs are a large class of animal RNAs with regulatory potency. Nature. 2013;495(7441):333–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hansen TB, Jensen TI, Clausen BH, Bramsen JB, Finsen B, Damgaard CK, Kjems J. Natural RNA circles function as efficient microRNA sponges. Nature. 2013;495(7441):384–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Guo JU, Agarwal V, Guo H, Bartel DP. Expanded identification and characterization of mammalian circular RNAs. Genome Biol. 2014;15(7):409.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Militello G, Weirick T, John D, Döring C, Dimmeler S, Uchida S. Screening and validation of lncRNAs and circRNAs as miRNA sponges. Brief Bioinform. 2017;18(5):780–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Song X, Zhang N, Han P, Moon B-S, Lai RK, Wang K, Lu W. Circular RNA profile in gliomas revealed by identification tool UROBORUS. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(9):e87–e87.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Zhao Z-J, Shen J. Circular RNA participates in the carcinogenesis and the malignant behavior of cancer. RNA Biol. 2017;14(5):514–21.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Su H, Lin F, Deng X, Shen L, Fang Y, Fei Z, Zhao L, Zhang X, Pan H, Xie D, et al. Profiling and bioinformatics analyses reveal differential circular RNA expression in radioresistant esophageal cancer cells. J Transl Med. 2016;14(1):225–225.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Dudekula DB, Panda AC, Grammatikakis I, De S, Abdelmohsen K, Gorospe M. CircInteractome: a web tool for exploring circular RNAs and their interacting proteins and microRNAs. RNA Biol. 2016;13(1):34–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Meng S, Zhou H, Feng Z, Xu Z, Tang Y, Li P, Wu M. CircRNA: functions and properties of a novel potential biomarker for cancer. Mol Cancer. 2017;16(1):94.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wang Y, Mo Y, Gong Z, Yang X, Yang M, Zhang S, Xiong F, Xiang B, Zhou M, Liao Q, et al. Circular RNAs in human cancer. Mol Cancer. 2017;16(1):25.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Huang M, He YR, Liang LC, Huang Q, Zhu ZQ. Circular RNA hsa_circ_0000745 may serve as a diagnostic marker for gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(34):6330–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Li P, Chen S, Chen H, Mo X, Li T, Shao Y, Xiao B, Guo J. Using circular RNA as a novel type of biomarker in the screening of gastric cancer. Clin Chim Acta. 2015;444:132–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Lai Z, Yang Y, Yan Y, Li T, Li Y, Wang Z, Shen Z, Ye Y, Jiang K, Wang S. Analysis of co-expression networks for circular RNAs and mRNAs reveals that circular RNAs hsa_circ_0047905, hsa_circ_0138960 and has-circRNA7690-15 are candidate oncogenes in gastric cancer. Cell Cycle. 2017;16(23):2301–11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Li T, Shao Y, Fu L, Xie Y, Zhu L, Sun W, Yu R, Xiao B, Guo J. Plasma circular RNA profiling of patients with gastric cancer and their droplet digital RT-PCR detection. J Mol Med (Berl). 2018;96(1):85–96.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Zhao Q, Chen S, Li T, Xiao B, Zhang X. Clinical values of circular RNA 0000181 in the screening of gastric cancer. J Clin Lab Anal. 2018;32(4):e22333–e22333.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Shao Y, Li J, Lu R, Li T, Yang Y, Xiao B, Guo J. Global circular RNA expression profile of human gastric cancer and its clinical significance. Cancer Med. 2017;6(6):1173–80.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Riquelme I, Letelier P, Riffo-Campos AL, Brebi P, Roa JC. Emerging role of miRNAs in the drug resistance of gastric cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(3):424.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Panda AC. Circular RNAs Act as miRNA Sponges. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1087:67–79.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Virgilio E, Giarnieri E, Giovagnoli MR, Montagnini M, Proietti A, D’Urso R, Mercantini P, Balducci G, Cavallini M. Long non-coding RNAs in the gastric juice of gastric cancer patients. Pathol Res Pract. 2018;214(9):1239–46.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Enright AJ, John B, Gaul U, Tuschl T, Sander C, Marks DS. MicroRNA targets in Drosophila. Genome Biol. 2003;5(1):R1–R1.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Pasquinelli AE. MicroRNAs and their targets: recognition, regulation and an emerging reciprocal relationship. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13(4):271–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Chen L-L. The biogenesis and emerging roles of circular RNAs. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016;17(4):205–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Huang Y-S, Jie N, Zou K-J, Weng Y. Expression profile of circular RNAs in human gastric cancer tissues. Mol Med Rep. 2017;16(3):2469–76.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Dang Y, Ouyang X, Zhang F, Wang K, Lin Y, Sun B, Wang Y, Wang L, Huang Q. Circular RNAs expression profiles in human gastric cancer. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):9060–9060.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Shen Y, Zhang J, Fu Z, Zhang B, Chen M, Ling X, Zou X. Gene microarray analysis of the circular RNAs expression profile in human gastric cancer. Oncol Lett. 2018;15(6):9965–72.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Sui W, Shi Z, Xue W, Ou M, Zhu Y, Chen J, Lin H, Liu F, Dai Y. Circular RNA and gene expression profiles in gastric cancer based on microarray chip technology. Oncol Rep. 2017;37(3):1804–14.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Vidal AF, Ribeiro-Dos-Santos AM, Vinasco-Sandoval T, Magalhães L, Pinto P, Anaissi AKM, Demachki S, de Assumpção PP, Dos Santos SEB, Ribeiro-Dos-Santos Â. The comprehensive expression analysis of circular RNAs in gastric cancer and its association with field cancerization. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):14551–14551.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Gu W, Sun Y, Zheng X, Ma J, Hu X-Y, Gao T, Hu M-J. Identification of gastric cancer-related circular RNA through microarray analysis and bioinformatics analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:2381680–2381680.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116(2):281–97.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Calin GA, Croce CM. MicroRNA signatures in human cancers. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6(11):857–66.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Shuai F, Wang B, Dong SX. miR-522-3p promotes tumorigenesis in human colorectal cancer via targeting bloom syndrome protein. Oncol Res. 2018;26(7):1113–21.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Zhang L, Zhang P, Tan Y, Feng Q, Zhao R. MicroRNA-522-3p plays an oncogenic role in glioblastoma through activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway via targeting SFRP2. NeuroReport. 2021;32(2):88–98.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Sun X, Hu X, Wang X, Jiang X. MiR-381–3p/RAB2A axis activates cell proliferation and inhibits cell apoptosis in bladder cancer. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2020;66(6):117–20.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Kong F, Li L, Wang C, Zhang Q, He S. MiR-381-3p suppresses biological characteristics of cancer in head-neck squamous cell carcinoma cells by targeting nuclear autoantigenic sperm protein (NASP). Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2020;84(4):703–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Shen Z, Li C, Zhang K, Yu W, Xiao H, Li B, Liu T. The up-regulation of miR-300 in gastric cancer and its effects on cells malignancy. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(5):6773–83.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Wang Y, Dou L, Qin Y, Yang H, Yan P. OIP5-AS1 contributes to tumorigenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma by miR-300/YY1-activated WNT pathway. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20:440.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    de Groen FL, Timmer LM, Menezes RX, Diosdado B, Hooijberg E, Meijer GA, Steenbergen RD, Carvalho B. Oncogenic role of mir-15a-3p in 13q amplicon-driven colorectal adenoma-to-carcinoma progression. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(7):e0132495.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Wang T, Hou J, Li Z, Zheng Z, Wei J, Song D, Hu T, Wu Q, Yang JY, Cai JC. miR-15a-3p and miR-16-1-3p negatively regulate Twist1 to repress gastric cancer cell invasion and metastasis. Int J Biol Sci. 2017;13(1):122–34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the Key Research and Development Projects of Social Development of Hainan Science and Technology Department (No. ZDYF2017118 and ZDKJ202005). The funding bodies had a role in study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation, and manuscript writing.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jian Song, Shuyong Yu, and Dunjing Zhong have contributed equally to this work

Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 570123, China

    Jian Song, Dunjing Zhong, Guihong Yuan, Ping Li, Ronglin Zhang, Yini Li & Zhaowei Chen

  2. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 570123, China

    Shuyong Yu

  3. Department of Digestive Endoscopy, The Affiliated Second Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 570100, China

    Weizhong Yang

  4. Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 570123, China

    Zhen Jia

  5. Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 570123, China

    Guobing Zhong

Authors
  1. Jian Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shuyong Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dunjing Zhong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Weizhong Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhen Jia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Guihong Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ping Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ronglin Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yini Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Guobing Zhong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Zhaowei Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JS was responsible for study design, main research issues, and paper writing; SY and DZ have made substantial contributions to the design of the work, the acquisition and analysis of data; WY, ZJ, GY, PL, RZ, YL, GZ, and ZC were responsible for material supply, experiments, and data collation and analysis. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Song.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the human medicine research ethics committee of Hainan Cancer Hospital (No. 2017011003). All participants provided written informed consent. The hospital academic committee approved my research team members to access the clinical/personal patient data used in our research.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, J., Yu, S., Zhong, D. et al. The circular RNA hsa_circ_000780 as a potential molecular diagnostic target for gastric cancer. BMC Med Genomics 14, 282 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-021-01096-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-021-01096-6

Keywords

  • Circular RNA
  • Gastric cancer
  • hsa_circ_000780

BMC Medical Genomics

ISSN: 1755-8794

Contact us