Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

A comprehensive analysis of adiponectin QTLs using SNP association, SNP cis-effects on peripheral blood gene expression and gene expression correlation identified novel metabolic syndrome (MetS) genes with potential role in carcinogenesis and systemic inflammation

  • 1, 2Email author,
  • 3,
  • 4,
  • 5,
  • 1, 2,
  • 2, 5,
  • 1, 2,
  • 3,
  • 3,
  • 3,
  • 3,
  • 3,
  • 3,
  • 3 and
  • 1, 2
BMC Medical Genomics20136:14

https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-8794-6-14

©  Zhang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

  • Received: 17 December 2012
  • Accepted: 23 April 2013
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is an aberration associated with increased risk for cancer and inflammation. Adiponectin, an adipocyte-produced abundant protein hormone, has countering effect on the diabetogenic and atherogenic components of MetS. Plasma levels of adiponectin are negatively correlated with onset of cancer and cancer patient mortality. We previously performed microsatellite linkage analyses using adiponectin as a surrogate marker and revealed two QTLs on chr5 (5p14) and chr14 (14q13).

Methods

Using individuals from 85 extended families that contributed to the linkage and who were measured for 42 clinical and biologic MetS phenotypes, we tested QTL-based SNP associations, peripheral white blood cell (PWBC) gene expression, and the effects of cis-acting SNPs on gene expression to discover genomic elements that could affect the pathophysiology and complications of MetS.

Results

Adiponectin levels were found to be highly intercorrelated phenotypically with the majority of MetS traits. QTL-specific haplotype-tagging SNPs associated with MetS phenotypes were annotated to 14 genes whose function could influence MetS biology as well as oncogenesis or inflammation. These were mechanistically categorized into four groups: cell-cell adhesion and mobility, signal transduction, transcription and protein sorting. Four genes were highly prioritized: cadherin 18 (CDH18), myosin X (MYO10), anchor protein 6 of AMPK (AKAP6), and neuronal PAS domain protein 3 (NPAS3). PWBC expression was detectable only for the following genes with multi-organ or with multi-function properties: NPAS3, MARCH6, MYO10 and FBXL7. Strong evidence of cis-effects on the expression of MYO10 in PWBC was found with SNPs clustered near the gene’s transcription start site. MYO10 expression in PWBC was marginally correlated with body composition (p= 0.065) and adipokine levels in the periphery (p = 0.064). Variants of genes AKAP6, NPAS3, MARCH6 and FBXL7 have been previously reported to be associated with insulin resistance, inflammatory markers or adiposity studies using genome-wide approaches whereas associations of CDH18 and MYO10 with MetS traits have not been reported before.

Conclusions

Adiponectin QTLs-based SNP association and mRNA expression identified genes that could mediate the association between MetS and cancer or inflammation.

Keywords

  • Adiponectin
  • Metabolic syndrome
  • Cancer risk
  • Inflammation

Background

MetS is a cluster of phenotypes characterized by preferential deposition of fat in the abdominal/visceral region, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, increased blood pressure and increased plasma levels of adipokines/cytokines [1]. Its complications include increased blood pressure/hypertension, glucose intolerance and type 2 diabetes. MetS has been associated with several forms of cancer including breast, endometrial, cervical, ovarian, esophageal, colon, rectal, pancreatic, hepatic, biliary and kidney cancers [2]. Overweight/obesity by itself accounts for 14% of cancer deaths in men and 20% in women [2]. Childhood cancer survivors are also known to present features of the MetS in later life [3].

Adiponectin is an adipocyte-produced kinin encoded by the gene apM1 (adipose most abundant transcript 1) at chr3q27 [4]. Adiponectin circulates in two forms, the low molecular weight (LMW) dimers, and the high molecular weight (HMW) oligomers. Tissue specificity of adiponectin n-mers is determined by their relative affinity for receptors (AdipoR1 and R2). AdipoR1 has a higher affinity for HMW. It is ubiquitously expressed but highly enriched in skeletal muscle. AdipoR2 can bind both forms and is mainly expressed in the liver [5]. Adiponectin has been shown to enhance insulin sensitivity and to exert anti-diabetogenic and anti-atherogenic functions as well as anti-inflammatory and anti-angiogenic activities [6–8]. Its plasma levels are inversely correlated with increased risk for obesity-related malignancies [9].

To explore possible genetic mechanisms linking MetS pathways with severe adverse outcomes such as development of cancer, we previously conducted a genome-wide linkage study using microsatellite markers at approximately 10 centiMorgan (cM) intervals in 1,100 individuals from 170 nuclear families (out of 85 extended families) of predominantly Northern European ancestry. This study identified two highly significant quantitative trait loci (QTLs) on chr5p14 and chr14q13 [10]. In the present study, we tested for genes harbored within these QTLs that could account for the association between MetS and carcinogenesis or systemic inflammation. For this purpose, we evaluated 1,137 individuals from the 85 extended families that contributed to the original linkage signals and who were phenotyped for 42 clinical and/or biological MetS traits (described in Results). We then performed QTL-focused SNP association and PWBC target gene expression analyses to identify those genes predisposing for this association.

Methods

Subjects and phenotypes

The present study cohort included 1,137 individuals from 85 extended families. Details of their recruitment and ascertainment traits procedures have been previously described [11, 12]. Recruitment was initiated via an obese proband (BMI ≥ 30) with minimal availability of one obese and one never-obese (BMI ≤ 27) siblings and at least one, preferably both, parents. The clinical phenotypic components, which included weight, height, BMI, waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC), waist to hip ratio (WHR), fasting glucose (FG), fasting insulin (FI), insulin to glucose ratio (IGR), homeostasis model assessment (HOMA), plasma triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), LDL-cholesterol (LDL-c) and calculated LDL-cholesterol levels (cal. LDL-c), HDL-cholesterol (HDL-c), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (sBP and dBP) and pulse, as described [11]. The biological traits included total fat mass both in kilogram and percentage (Fatkg and Fatpct) and total fat free mass both in kilograms and as percentage of total body mass (Leankg and Leanpct) by DXA (Dual-emission X-ray absorptiometry) [13]; total abdominal, visceral and subcutaneous fat size (TAF, VF and SubQF) by computed tomography (CT) scans of the fourth lumbar spine [14]; respiratory quotient (RQ) and resting energy expenditure (REE) measured in resting subjects using a Deltatrac Indirect Calorimeter (Sensor Medics, VIASYS Healthcare, Conshohocken, PA) after a 10 hr fast; insulin/glucose responsiveness indices: insulin sensitivity (SI), glucose effectiveness (SG), acute insulin response to glucose (AIRG) and disposition index (DI) by Minimal Model [15]; lipids/lipoprotein sizing [HDL median diameter (HMED), LDL-cholesterol median diameter (LMEDn), LDL-cholesterol dominant peak diameter (LDLppd) and apoB-containing non-HDL median diameter (BMED) which includes VLDL, ILDL, LPα and LDL] measured by polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis [16]; circulating levels of adiponectin, leptin by a double antibody, equilibrium RIA (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA); and TNF-alpha, interleukin-1beta (IL-1β) and interleukin-6 (IL-6)] measured as described [17]. All study procedures for adults and children were approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the Medical College of Wisconsin and Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin, respectively. Informed consent was obtained from the participating subjects or guardians of participating minors.

SNP genotyping and data cleaning

Genomic DNA was extracted and prepared from whole blood using commercial kits (Puregene, Minneapolis, MN). Genome-wide SNP genotyping was performed using Affymetrix Genome-Wide Human SNP 6.0 arrays and SNP calls were generated by Genotype Console 3.2. Individuals with fewer than 95% of all available markers called were excluded. 869,222 autosomal SNPs were prepared by Preswalk and checked for Mendelian consistency with SimWalk2. A SNP was eliminated if: 1) fewer than 95% of the cohort were typed successfully; 2) the SNP was monoallelic; 3) the SNP had more than two alleles; 4) fewer than five copies of the SNP existed in the current study cohort. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was tested for each SNP using SOLAR [18]; SNPs with excessive deviation from HWE (p < 10-8) were excluded. Missing SNP data were imputed with MERLIN [19].

Transcriptional profiling

Genome-wide transcriptional profiles of a subset of the SNP genotyping cohort (369 individuals from 55 nuclear families) were obtained as previously described [20] with modifications. Briefly, for each individual 2.5 ml blood was collected into a PAXgene® Blood RNA Tube (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ) following an overnight fast. Total RNA was isolated from each tube using the PAXgene Blood RNA Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and anti-sense RNA (aRNA) was synthesized using the MessageAmp II-Biotin aRNA kit (Ambion, Austin, TX). A total of 1.5 μg aRNA was hybridized to Illumina HumanWG-6 version 2 or version 3 chips (Illumina, San Diego, CA) and expression detected on the Illumina® BeadArray™ 500GX Reader. Illumina GenomeStudio software (version 2010.3) was used for preliminary data analysis with standard background normalization. The data discussed in this publication have been deposited in NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus [21] and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE45987 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE45987).

Statistical analysis

Measured genotype analysis

In SOLAR, each SNP genotype was converted to a covariate measure equal to 0, 1 or 2 copies of the minor allele (or, for missing genotypes, a weighted covariate based on imputation). These covariates were included in variance-components mixed models for measured genotype analyses [22] versus null models that incorporated the random effect of kinship and fixed effects such as age, age2, sex and their interactions. Individual scores from a principal components analysis of representative SNPs were also included to correct for possible population stratification [23].

Within chromosomal regions showing the strongest prior evidence of linkage (as logarithm of odds, LOD, score) with MetS traits in our MRC-OB cohort, we selected all available SNPs on the Affymetrics 6.0 array that mapped within a 1-LOD confidence interval of the maximum LOD score in each region. Each SNP covariate was tested independently in a 1 degree of freedom likelihood ratio test. To take into account the linkage disequilibrium between SNPs in each region, we calculated the effective number of independent SNPs (Neff) using the method of Moskvina & Schmidt [24]. Critical p-values were calculated using Bonferroni/Šidák correction for each linkage region based on its Neff.

Gene expression analysis

Microarray data were available in two batches, one based on Version 2 arrays (48,701 probes, 307 samples) and the other on Version 3 (48,803 probes, 230 samples). To guard against possible batch effects and probe differences, each batch was analyzed separately: The number of probe transcripts detectable at p≤0.05 by BeadStudio software was counted, a false discovery rate (FDR) was computed across all probes, and transcripts detectable at 5% FDR were retained. Expression levels were log2 transformed and inverse-quartile normalized. Transformed and normalized expression levels for probes that mapped to the 1-LOD QTL regions were tested for association with phenotypes of interest in models that included the random effect of kinship. Gene-centric p-values were calculated by combining independent p-values from the two microarray batches and multiple probes using Stouffer’s weighted Z-score method [25] implemented in R.

Results

Intercorrelation between plasma adiponectin levels and MetS phenotypes

Based on their attributes in different biological pathways, we categorized our 42 measured MetS phenotypes into five groups: body composition, insulin responsiveness, lipids/lipoprotein profiles, cardiovascular performance, and adipokine and cytokines (Table 1). Means ± SD of the 42 MetS phenotypes and levels of their heritability have been previously described [26]. We found that plasma adioponectin levels were highly heritable (additive heritability, h2 = 0.48) in our study cohort. Intercorrelation analysis of leading MetS component phenotypes revealed significant phenotypic correlations to varied degrees (See the Additional file 1: Table S1). Plasma adiponectin is also significantly correlated with the majority of tested phenotypes (29 out of 41, nominal p<0.05). In particular, it is highly correlated with the MetS-defining [27, 28] phenotypes WC (correlation p-value=1.86×10-22), FG (7.8×10-4), plasma TG (1.3×10-8), plasma HDL-c (5.2×10-12), sBP (1.55×10-6) and dBP (7.1×10-3). Overall, levels of adiponectin inversely correlate with a phenotypes representing adverse adipose distribution (weight, BMI, WC, HC, WHR, Fatkg, Fatpct and SubQF, VF and TAF), elevated fasting glucose levels and insulin resistance indices (FG, FI, IGR and HOMA), dyslipidemia (TG), cardiovascular malfunction (sBP, dBP and pulse) and leptin. On the contrary, adiponectin levels correlate positively with several phenotypes indexing leanness (Leanpct), insulin sensitivity (SI and SG) and HDL-c. These results indicate that adiponectin is a reliable and significant phenotypic surrogate of both the clinical and biological traits of MetS in our cohort.
Table 1

Correlations of plasma adiponectin with the other MetS phenotypes in our cohort

 

Phenotype

Correlation p-value

Inter-correlation (ρ)

Body composition

Weight, kg

7.37×10-17

−0.29

Height, cm

0.030

−0.08

BMI, kg/m2

4.22×10-16

−0.29

Waist circumference (WC), cm

1.90×10-22

−0.34

Hip circumference (HC), cm

4.80×10-16

−0.29

Waist to Hip ratio (WHR)

0.000025

−0.15

Total Fat Mass (Fatkg), kg

0.00078

−0.17

Total Fat Mass (Fatpct),%

0.032

−0.11

Total Lean Mass (Leankg), kg

0.00013

−0.20

Total Lean Mass (Leanpct), %

0.026

0.11

Subcutaneous Fat (SubQF), g

0.0012

−0.18

Visceral Fat (VF), g

2.04×10-8

−0.30

Total Abdominal Fat (TAF), g

0.000039

−0.23

Respiratory Quotient (RQ)

0.78

0.02

Resting Energy Expenditure (REE), kcal/24 hrs

8.15×10-7

−0.26

REE/weight, kcal/24hrs/kg

0.29

0.06

 

REE/Lean mass (REE/LM), kcal/24hrs/kg

0.16

−0.08

Insulin responsiveness

Fasting Glucose (FG), mmol/l

0.00078

−0.12

Fasting Insulin (FI),pmol/l

8.85×10-8

−0.18

Insulin/glucose (IGR)

6.63×10-6

−0.15

Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA)

3.40×10-8

−0.19

Insulin Sensitivity (SI), (× 10-4/min/μU/ml)

1.28×10-6

0.26

Glucose Effectiveness (SG), min-1

0.068

0.10

Acute Insulin Response to glucose (AIRG), μU/ml × 10min

0.45

−0.04

 

Disposition Index (DI), AUC (Insulin0-10 min) × SI

0.012

0.14

Lipids/lipoprotein profiles

Triglycerides (TG), mmol/l

1.30×10-8

−0.20

Total Cholesterol (TC), mmol/l

0.50

−0.02

LDL-cholesterol (LDL-c), mmol/l

0.42

−0.03

Calculated LDL-C (cal. LDL-c), mmol/l

0.92

0.00

HDL-cholesterol (HDL-c), mmol/l

5.17×10-12

0.25

HMED, nm

0.000020

0.18

LMEDn, nm

0.000851

0.14

LDLppd, nm

4.43×10-6

0.19

 

BMED, nm

0.058

0.08

Cardiovascular performance

Systolic Blood Pressure (sBP), mmHg

1.55×10-6

−0.16

Diastolic Blood Pressure (dBP), mmHg

0.0071

−0.09

 

Pulse, beats/min

0.023

−0.08

Adipokine and cytokines

Leptin, ng/ml

5.64×10-11

−0.23

TNF-alpha, pg/ml

0.24

0.04

Interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), pg/ml

0.89

0.01

 

Interleukin-6 (IL-6), pg/ml

0.81

−0.01

The pair-wise intercorrelation (ρ) and its respective significance (p-value) between plasma adiponectin levels and each of the other MetS phenotypes are shown. Inter-correlations that passed the nominal significance cutoff (p<0.05) are depicted in bold italic.

SNP genotype/phenotype association

Consistent with common practice, we defined confidence regions for the previously defined adiponectin linkage peaks as the physical positions adjacent to the peak showing linkage evidence of at least LOD score - 1: 5p14 [peak LOD=4.1; chr5: 9,792,000-23,021,100bp (NCBI36/hg18)] and 14q13 [peak LOD=3.2; chr14: 23,131,000-36,761,868bp (NCBI36/hg18)]. Haplotype-tagging SNPs located within these regions were tested for statistical association with each of the 42 MetS phenotypes. To account for multiple testing within QTLs while accounting for linkage disequilibrium (LD) among SNPs, QTL-specific significance thresholds were calculated based upon Bonferroni/Šidák correction for the effective number of independent SNPs at 5p14 (nSNPs =3540, neffective= 2429.61, pα=0.05= 2.11×10-5) and 14q13 (nSNPs=3794, neffective =2760.37, pα=0.05=1.86×10-5). SNPs that passed region-specific significance thresholds for respective traits and/or the highest nominally significant SNP of each trait for each trait are shown in Tables 2 and 3.
Table 2

MetS SNP association with phenotypes and their gene annotation at 5p14 QTL

Variant

Minor allele

MAF

-LOG(p)

Associated phenotypes

Nearest gene

Location

Annotation

rs10061119

T

0.26

5.07

Weight

CDH18

intron

Cell Cell adhesion

rs13357704

A

0.26

5.07

Weight

CDH18

intron

Cell Cell adhesion

rs10805723

G

0.25

5.03

Weight

CDH18

intron

Cell Cell adhesion

rs16887308

T

0.26

5.03

Weight

CDH18

intron

Cell Cell adhesion

rs4386736

A

0.26

5.03

Weight

CDH18

intron

Cell Cell adhesion

rs6879762

C

0.26

5.03

Weight

CDH18

intron

Cell Cell adhesion

rs10062513

G

0.25

4.68

Weight

CDH18

intron

Cell Cell adhesion

rs13355121

C

0.25

4.68

Weight

CDH18

intron

Cell Cell adhesion

rs10062864

A

0.25

4.57

Weight

CDH18

intron

Cell Cell adhesion

rs163282

A

0.26

4.27

Height

FAM134B

intron

Neuron maintenance

rs10061119

T

0.26

4.82

BMI

CDH18

intron

Cell Cell adhesion

rs13357704

A

0.26

4.82

BMI

CDH18

intron

Cell Cell adhesion

rs10805723

G

0.25

4.77

BMI

CDH18

intron

Cell Cell adhesion

rs16887308

T

0.26

4.77

BMI

CDH18

intron

Cell Cell adhesion

rs4386736

A

0.26

4.77

BMI

CDH18

intron

Cell Cell adhesion

rs6879762

C

0.26

4.77

BMI

CDH18

intron

Cell Cell adhesion

rs13355121

C

0.25

4.52

BMI

CDH18

intron

Cell Cell adhesion

rs10062864

A

0.25

4.43

BMI

CDH18

intron

Cell Cell adhesion

rs10061119

T

0.26

4.66

WC

CDH18

intron

Cell Cell adhesion

rs13357704

A

0.26

4.66

WC

CDH18

intron

Cell Cell adhesion

rs10805723

G

0.25

4.57

WC

CDH18

intron

Cell Cell adhesion

rs16887308

T

0.26

4.57

WC

CDH18

intron

Cell Cell adhesion

rs4386736

A

0.26

4.57

WC

CDH18

intron

Cell Cell adhesion

rs6879762

C

0.26

4.57

WC

CDH18

intron

Cell Cell adhesion

rs995021

C

0.49

3.57

HC

CDH18

intron

Cell Cell adhesion

rs1864220

G

0.07

3.45

WHR

FBXL7

intron

Protein sorting

rs860545

T

0.16

2.89

Fatkg

MARCH11

intergenic

Protein sorting

rs10223312

T

0.01

3.52

Fatpct

mRNA BC033144

intergenic

unknown function

rs17707882

A

0.04

4.47

Leankg

MYO10

intron

Cell Cell adhesion

rs10223312

T

0.01

3.54

Leanpct

mRNA BC033144

intergenic

unknown function

rs1840870

C

0.44

2.44

SubQF

EST BG220738

intergenic

unknown function

rs11134371

T

0.33

4.04

VF

LOC285692

intron

unknown function

rs17275322

G

0.03

2.82

TAF

LOC285692

intron

unknown function

rs12652510

C

0.19

3.11

RQ

CDH18

intron

Cell Cell adhesion

rs10065719

G

0.14

2.74

REE

AY330599

intergenic

tumor antigen

rs6859862

C

0.41

3.61

REE/weight

DNAH5

intron

motor protein

rs1809880

G

0.06

3.16

REE/Lean

ROPN1L

intron

sperm protein

rs7721328

G

0.17

3.57

FG

mRNA TAG1

intron

tumor antigen

rs2582660

C

0.18

2.88

FI

MARCH11

intergenic

Protein sorting

rs16902967

A

0.03

3.77

IGR

DNAH5

intergenic

motor protein

rs4327597

A

0.14

3.25

HOMA

TAG

intron

tumor antigen

rs831657

G

0.14

3.23

SI

MARCH11

intergenic

protein sorting

rs1551936

T

0.15

3.44

SG

FAM134B

intron

Neuron maintenance

rs2929724

C

0.50

3.30

AIR

LOC285696

intron

unknown function

rs10805650

G

0.33

3.11

DI

EST BM682321

intergenic

unknown function

rs16887451

C

0.07

3.10

TG

mRNA BC028204

intron

unknown function

rs17839277

T

0.03

3.55

TC

mRNA BC028204

intergenic

unknown function

rs12659663

A

0.25

4.17

LDL-c

mRNA BC028204

intron

unknown function

rs12659663

A

0.25

3.87

cal. LDL-c

mRNA BC028204

intron

unknown function

rs6883134

G

0.06

3.25

HDL-c

TRIO mRNA

intron

protein interaction

rs10065719

G

0.14

4.48

HMED

AY330599

intergenic

tumor antigen

rs10079252

G

0.49

4.30

LMEDn

mRNA U92022

intergenic

transposon Hsmar2

rs10073730

C

0.01

3.77

LDLppd

MYO10

intron

Cell Cell adhesion

rs6894869

C

0.01

5.13

BMED

CTNND2

intron

Cell Cell adhesion

rs5745297

A

0.07

3.58

sBP

DAP

3’ UTR

cell death

rs6450583

G

0.21

3.27

dBP

mRNA BC028204

intergenic

unknown function

rs1971391

A

0.44

3.10

Pulse

mRNA AK130861

intergenic

unknown function

rs31509

G

0.28

3.33

Adiponectin

MYO10

intron

Cell Cell adhesion

rs404639

G

0.06

4.29

Leptin

CDH12

intron

Cell Cell adhesion

rs6893920

G

0.22

4.04

TNF-alpha

mRNA U92022

intergenic

transposon Hsmar2

rs7730897

T

0.10

3.47

IL-1β

MARCH11

intergenic

protein sorting

rs17707882

A

0.04

3.77

IL-6

MYO10

intron

Cell Cell adhesion

SNPs within 1 LOD reduction from the linkage peak were tested for associations against the 42 phenotypes. Annotated genes and their known function were derived from the NCBI build 36 human genome assembly. Annotations were determined at the position and within 250kb up- and downstream of the associated SNP. Data shown in column “-Log10(p)” are levels of the highest association. SNP associations that exceed statistical QTL-specific significance threshold are bolded.

Table 3

MetS SNP association with phenotypes and their gene annotation at 14q13 QTL

Variant

Minor allele

MAF

-LOG(p)

Associated phenotypes

Nearest gene

Location

Annotation

rs1955850

G

0.33

2.95

Weight

NOVA1

intergenic

post-transcription regulation

rs2332524

G

0.10

2.87

Height

STXBP6

intergenic

exocytosis

rs1955850

G

0.33

3.75

BMI

NOVA1

intergenic

post-transcription regulation

rs6574794

A

0.06

3.08

WC

NOVA1

intergenic

post-transcription regulation

rs1956993

C

0.09

2.92

HC

AKAP6

intergenic

signal transduction

rs17096124

G

0.03

3.81

WHR

PRKD1

intron

signal transduction

rs8007613

G

0.28

2.88

Fatkg

NPAS3

intron

Transcription regulation

rs41449149

T

0.07

3.45

Fatpct

PRKD1

intergenic

signal transduction

rs1111533

C

0.05

3.53

Leankg

NPAS3

intron

Transcription regulation

rs41449149

T

0.07

3.55

Leanpct

PRKD1

intergenic

signal transduction

rs10137682

G

0.37

3.35

SubQF

NPAS3

intron

Transcription regulation

rs12888531

C

0.06

3.59

VF

SLC25A21

intron

solute carrier

rs10137682

G

0.37

3.39

TAF

NPAS3

intron

Transcription regulation

rs11623278

G

0.46

4.16

RQ

AKAP6

intergenic

signal transduction

rs11161057

A

0.42

3.42

REE

MIR548AI

intergenic

mircoRNA

rs10137682

G

0.37

3.50

REE/weight

NPAS3

intron

Transcription regulation

rs17414154

A

0.05

3.43

REE/Lean

AKAP6

intron

signal transduction

rs17112354

A

0.08

2.95

FG

BC148262/MIR4307/LOC100505967/NOVA1

intergenic

cDNA clone/mircoRNA/non coding RNA/paraneoplastic disease antigens

rs2105274

G

0.39

3.40

FI

NOVA1

intergenic

paraneoplastic disease antigens

rs1626390

C

0.11

3.48

IGR

EGLN3

intergenic

Transcription regulation

rs2105274

G

0.39

3.47

HOMA

NOVA1

intergenic

paraneoplastic disease antigens

rs1951758

T

0.36

3.21

SI

MIR4307 / LOC100505967 / NOVA1

intergenic

mircoRNA/non-coding RNA/paraneoplastic disease antigens

rs17114954

A

0.04

3.32

SG

MIR548AI

downstream

mircoRNA

rs8012040

G

0.46

3.53

AIR

BC148262 /LOC100505967/ NOVA1

intergenic

cDNA clone / non coding RNA/paraneoplastic disease antigens

rs10483452

C

0.27

3.82

DI

PPP2R3C

intron

signal transduction

rs8006023

A

0.05

4.60

TG

NPAS3

intron

transcription regulation

rs8004607

C

0.10

4.44

TC

NPAS3

intron

transcription regulation

rs712300

C

0.26

4.09

LDL-c

EGLN3

intergenic

transcription regulation

rs8004607

C

0.10

3.71

cal. LDL-c

NPAS3

intron

transcription factor

rs10136818

T

0.02

3.63

HDL-c

STXBP6

intergenic

exocytosis

rs12886242

G

0.12

2.61

HMED

NPAS3

intron

Transcription regulation

rs17103757

G

0.05

3.84

LMEDn

BRMS1L

intergenic

transcription regulation

rs847501

C

0.35

3.29

LDLppd

BRMS1L

intergenic

transcription regulation

rs10134570

C

0.02

3.83

BMED

NPAS3

intron

Transcription regulation

rs1951039

A

0.45

4.26

sBP

STXBP6/NOVA1

intergenic

exocytosis/paraneoplastic disease antigens

rs10498306

C

0.13

4.17

dBP

MIR548AI/PRKD1

intergenic

microRNA/signal transduction

rs8007613

G

0.28

3.04

Pulse

NPAS3

intron

Transcription regulation

rs9322942

A

0.33

3.43

Adiponectin

SRP54

intron

signal recognition particle 54kDal

rs17427680

C

0.05

3.12

Leptin

G2E3

intergenic

protein sorting

rs1440983

A

0.04

3.64

TNF-alpha

PRKD1

intergenic

signal transduction

rs11849533

C

0.17

3.67

IL-1B

NPAS3

intron

Transcription regulation

rs17406989

T

0.09

2.87

IL-6

NPAS3

intron

Transcription regulation

SNPs within 1 LOD reduction from the linkage peak were tested for associations against the 42 phenotypes. Annotated genes and their known function were derived from the NCBI build 36 human genome assembly. Annotations were determined at the position and within 250kb up- and downstream of the associated SNP. Data shown in column “-Log10(p)” are levels of the highest association. SNP associations that exceed statistical QTL-specific significance threshold are bolded.

QTL5p14

Fine-mapping of this region identified QTL-wide significant SNP associations with body composition phenotypes, including weight and BMI (Figure 1A and 1B). As shown in Table 2, 7 SNPs led by rs10061119 are mapped to an intronic region of the gene encoding cadherin 18 (CDH18). In addition, SNPs annotated near myosin X (MYO10), showed nominally significant associations with plasma adiponectin (Table 2 and Figure 1C). The second strongest SNP association cluster with adiponectin (Figure 1C, pointed by a red arrow) is intergenic and is approximately 400kb 5’ to the transcription start site of the cadherin-18 gene CDH18 (Figure 1C, framed in green).
Figure 1
Figure 1

Manhattan plots of SNP associations with MetS phenotypes within adiponectin QTL at 5p14. Dark blue dots depict levels of association of identifier phenotypes with all SNPs in the region determined from 1 LOD reduction from the peak [chr5: 9,792,000-23,021,100 (NCBI36/hg18)]. Vertical axis represents minus logarithm of the p-values and horizontal represents the chromosomal position (Mb). Levels of QTL-wide significance thresholds are shown by the dash lines. Red lines indicate the significant level (pα=0.05= 2.11×10-5) and blue lines indicate suggestive level pα=0.1= 4.11×10-5). A) Association patterns of all the SNPs of the region with weight phenotype. Transcripts defined by UCSC genome browser (31, 32) are shown below the Manhattan plot, by blue bars. SNPs that show highest association with weight are located in gene CDH18 (framed in orange). B) SNP associations with BMI. C) SNP associations with plasma levels of adiponectin. SNPs with strongest associations are mapped to MYO10, shown framed in the lower panel and the blown-up picture. The second locus of peak signals (pointed by an arrow) is mapped to be 400kb upstream of CDH18, framed in green.

SNPs mapped to CDH18 (cadherin 18) were also nominally associated with other MetS phenotypes including WC, HC and RQ. SNP rs404639 mapped to an intron of CDH12, another member of the cadherin family, and was associated with plasma leptin. SNP rs6894869 was significantly associated with lipid particle size phenotype BMED and mapped to an intron of CTNND2, which functions in the same pathway as cadherins, plays a crucial role in CNS development [29] and is a partner of the Alzheimer disease-associated gene presenilin-1 [30]. MYO10 was also nominally associated with Leankg, LDLppd and IL-6. For the other MetS traits the strongest associations were with SNPs near several other genes with biological relevance to cancer. SNPs near TAG, a tumor antigen gene, were associated with HMED (high density lipid particle sizing), REE (resting energy expenditure), and insulin phenotypes FG and HOMA. SNPs mapped to MARCH11 and FBXL7, two ubiquitin ligases involved in the pro-inflammation pathways, were associated with total fat mass, FI, SI and pro-inflammation marker IL-1beta (MARCH11), and with lean body mass (FBXL7).

QTL14q13

This QTL region has a high density of genes with regulatory functions including signal transduction, transcription and post-transcription processing. Our fine-mapping identified SNPs associated with each of the 42 MetS phenotypes. Table 3 summarizes the SNPs most highly associated with each trait, the attributes of the variants, and the gene ontology of their annotated genes. Variants of NPAS3, a neuronal transcription factor thought to be involved in brain tumor suppression, were found to be associated with 11 of the MetS phenotypes (Fatkg, Leankg, SubQF, TAF, REE, TG, TC, LDL-c, pulse, IL1b and IL-6), suggesting a pleitropic effect (Table 3). Two of these associations (TG and TC) were borderline significant, marginally reaching the regional threshold (Table 3 and Figure 2A). SNPs near BRMS1L, a breast cancer suppressor gene, was associated with LMEDn and LDLppd. SNPs of EGLN3, a regulator of transcription factor HIF that affects apoptosis in hemangioblastoma and clear cell renal cancer, were associated with IGR and LDL-c. SNPs of NOVA1, a post-transcription processing of the GnRH paraneoplastic antigen, were associated at nominal significance with several phenotypes including weight, BMI, WC, FG, FI, HOMA, SI, AIR, and sBP.
Figure 2
Figure 2

Manhattan plots of SNP associations with MetS phenotypes within adiponectin QTL at 14q13. Dark Blue dots depict levels of association of identifier phenotypes with all SNPs in the region determined from 1 LOD reduction from the peak [chr14: 23,131,000-36,761,868 (NCBI36/hg18)]. Vertical axis represents minus logarithm of the p-values and horizontal represents the chromosomal position (Mb). Levels of QTL-wide significance thresholds are shown by the dash lines. Red lines indicate the significant level (pα=0.05= pα=0.05=1.86×10-5) and blue lines indicate suggestive level pα=0.1= 3.72×10-5). A) Association patterns of all the SNPs of the region with RQ phenotype. Transcripts defined by UCSC genome browser (31, 32) are shown below the Manhattan plot, by blue bars. SNPs that show highest association with weight are located in gene AKAP6 (framed in red). B) SNP associations with triglycerides. SNPs that show highest associations with triglycerides are mapped to the transcription factor gene NPAS3.

Prominent SNP associations in this region were mapped to genes for signal transducers include kinases and kinase-related proteins AKAP6 and PRKD1 and the phosphotase PPP2R3C. SNPs of the gene encoding AKAP6, an anchor protein for AMPK, which may connect MetS with cancer, were associated with HC, RQ and REE/leanmass. SNPs of PRKD1, a kinase that phosphorylates and therefore activates E-cadherin functions, were associated with WHR, Fatpct, Leanpct, and TNF-alpha. SNPs of PPP2R3C, a protein phosphatase, were associated with DI. SNP rs9322942 of SRP54, the gene for a signal recognition particle protein, is associated with adiponectin. Figure 2 shows the SNP association patterns with phenotypes RQ and TG at this QTL.

The cis-SNP effects on gene expression

To test the function of the interrogated SNPs of the two adiponectin QTLs, we evaluated the effect of each variant on the levels of transcripts produced from the genes located within these two regions. We surveyed transcripts that were robustly detectable after filtering through our quality control procedures (see Methods). We then assessed the association between QTL-specific SNPs and each transcript annotated to the same locus.

Figure 3 shows the effects of SNPs of the chr5 locus on expression of MYO10. We found strong signals clustering in proximity to the transcription start site (TSS) of MYO10. SNPs exhibiting the strongest cis-effects (lowest p-value=5.43×10-6) are in high linkage disequilibrium (data not shown) and span a 17 kb region that has been shown previously to be highly important for transcription initiation [31–34].
Figure 3
Figure 3

Cis-effects of tagging SNPs located at chr5p14 on PWBC expression of MYO10 gene. Association significance level (shown by –log10 p-value) with MYO10 gene expression of each tagging-SNP of the 1 LOD-score drop of adiponectin QTL at chr5: 9,792,000-23,021,100bp (NCBI36/hg18) is plotted against its respective genomic position using LocusZoom [35]. The position of each typed SNPs is also depicted in black bars above the plot. Red horizontal line shows the significance cutoff after Bonferoni-correction (pα=0.05=1.4×10-5). The color of the dot that represents each SNP on the plot shows the degree of correlation with rs2434960, the variant with the highest significance levels of cis-effect on MYO10 expression. Correlation (r2) scale is depicted on the right. Genes mapped to this region are shown below the plot, with their directionality on the chromosome strand depicted. MYO10 gene is framed in orange. In the blow-up figure on the right, functional genomics data from ENCODE consortium [33, 34] of the region with the strongest cis-effect evidence in our analysis is shown in the UCSC Genome Browser view [31, 32]. The four SNPs with the highest significance levels of cis-effects are labeled as red dots on MYO10 gene track. ENCODE functional genomics tracks shown include evidence of enhancer- and promoter-associated histone modifications (H3K4Me1, H3K4Me3 and H3K27Ac), DNase hypersensitivity clusters and transcription factor binding assays.

We further analyzed the relationship between MYO10 gene expression patterns in PWBC and key MetS phenotypes for which we had found evidence of SNP-phenotype associations (Table 2). Table 4 shows the levels of the correlations between the level of MYO10 gene expression and MetS traits. We found positive correlations of MYO10 expression with measures of adiposity. MYO10 expression correlated negatively with plasma levels of adiponectin (although this did not reach statistical significance) and was positively correlated with plasma leptin at
Table 4

Correlation (standardized beta ± SE) of PWBC expression levels of MYO10 transcript

 

MetS phenotype

MYO10(β±SE)

Body Composition

Total Fat Mass (Fatkg), kg

0.04 ± 0.11

Total Fat Mass (Fatpct), %

0.20 ± 0.11*

Total Lean Mass (Leankg), kg

−0.06 ± 0.10

 

Total Lean Mass (Leanpct), %

−0.20 ± 0.11*

Adipokines

Adiponectin, ng/mL

−0.02 ± 0.09

 

Leptin, ng/mL

0.16 ± 0.09*

*Correlations with suggestive significance (p<0.1).

Summary of candidate gene prioritization

Table 5 summarizes all the biologically relevant cancer or pro-inflammation genes, annotated by the SNP associations and gene expression correlations with MetS phenotypes under the adiponectin QTL peaks of 5p14 and 14q13. Figures 1 and 2 show SNP/phenotype association plots of SNPs located within these QTLs that we consider to be of the highest priority based on their biological relevance, in relation to the phenotypes from which the top candidate gene was identified.
Table 5

Summary of prioritized genes associating MetS with cancer or inflammation

Biological mechanism

Annotated genes

Biological function

Association identifier phenotype

Relevance to cancer and/or inflammation

Evidence

Cell cell adhesion and cell motility

CDH18

A member of Calcium-dependent cell adhesion molecules subfamily type 2 N-cadherin, affects morphogenesis, growth and tissue homeostasis.

weight, BMI, WC, HC and RQ

Formation, growth, invasion and migration of malignant tumors, including Crohn’s disease and prostate cancer. Ectopic expression in breast cancer cells promotes motility, invasion and metastasis.

SNP associations

CDH12

A member of the cadherin family.

leptin

Its homologue, CDH11, promotes synovial fibroblasts to secret pro-inflammatory cytokines.

SNP associations

CTNND2

A partner molecule in the cadherin complex. It is a transcription activator.

BMED

Involvement in cancer as above

SNP associations

 

MYO10

An associate of the cadherin-catenin complex

Leankg, LDLppd, adiponectin, IL-6

Function unclear, presumably involved in cancer as above

SNP associations, SNP cis-effects on gene expression, expression/MetS phenotype correlations

Signal transduction

AKAP6

An anchor protein for the AMP-activated protein kinase, a regulator of glycogen, sugar and lipid metabolism.

HC, RQ and REE/Lean

It might be involved in any cancer biology that is mediated through p53

SNP associations

PRKD1

A protein kinase that exerts its function by phosphorylating target proteins.

WHR, Fatpct, Leanpct, and TNF-alpha

It is involved in prostate cancer through E-cadherin phosphorylation

SNP associations

 

PPP2R3C

It encodes the regulatory component of the protein ser/thr metallo-phosphatase. May regulate MCM3AP, which is a phosphorylation-dependent DNA replication initiation enzyme. Its homologue also play a role in the activation-induced cell death of B-cells.

DI

It may presumably be involved in cancer biology that relates MCM3. These include brain and thyroid cancer. It may also be involved in inflammation through its hypothetical function in B cell apoptosis.

SNP associations

Transcription

TAG

A novel tumor antigen gene that is immunogenic.

REE,FG, HOMA, HMED

Testis cancer, skin melanoma and myelogenous leukemia.

SNP associations

NPAS3

A transcription factor which regulates neurogenesis, glucose metabolism and the linkage of the two.

Fatkg, Leankg, SubQF, TAF, REE/weight, TG, TC, cal. LDL-c, pulse, IL-1β, IL-6

It is a brain tumor suppressor and a marker for survival.

SNP associations,

    

SNP cis-effects on gene expression

NKX2-8

A homeobox transcription factor

Weight and height

Fetal liver and hepatocellular carcinoma and lung cancer

SNP associations

BRMS1L

A homologue to transcription factor BRMS1, which functions in a histone acetylase complex that repress target genes

LMEDn and LDLppd

Breast cancer progression and melanoma metastasis

SNP associations

NOVA1

It is a neuron-specific tumor antigen that has RNA-binding activity and functions to ensure correct pre-mRNA splicing of target RNA

BMI, WC, FG, FI, SI, AIR, HMED and sBP

It is involved in the paraneoplastic motor disorder

SNP associations

 

EGLN3

It is a hydroxylase for target transcription factor HIF and mediates apoptosis in neuronal cells under development

IGR and LDL-c

It is involved in hemangioblastoma, clear cell renal carcinoma and formation of pheochromocytoma

SNP associations

Protein sorting

MARCH11

An ubiquitin ligase that is implicated in protein sorting and transport from trans-Golgi network to multivascular body.

Fatkg, FI, SI and IL-1β

Might be involved in pro-inflammatory cardiomyopathy.

SNP associations

 

FBXL7

Another ubiquitin ligase specific for phosphorylated protein degradation.

WHR

Might be involved in pro-inflammation as above

SNP associations, SNP cis-effects on gene expression

Discussion

As previously seen in other studies [36, 37] plasma adiponectin was significantly correlated with several of the clinical outcome and biologic precursor phenotypes of MetS in our cohort. It correlated with BMI, total body fat mass, visceral vs. subcutaneous fat distribution, insulin to glucose response indices, levels of plasma lipids/lipoprotein density profiles, and circulating levels of leptin and cytokines (Table 1). As expected, the key clinical traits of MetS are also inter-correlated with each other in our subjects (Additional file 1: Table S1). Using adiponectin level as a surrogate for MetS, we previously identified two adiponectin-linked QTLs (5p14 and 14q13) in our study population. We now have used SNP association and the cis-effects of local SNPs on PWBC expression to discover MetS-related genes within these two QTLs. By doing so, we were able to identify multiple novel genes that have significant associations with individual MetS phenotypes. These genes can be mechanistically grouped into four categories (Table 5): (1) cell-cell adhesion and mobility (CDH18, CDH12, CTNND2 and MYO10) (2) signal transduction (AKAP, PRKD1 and PPP2R3C); (3) transcription (NPAS3, BRMS1, Nova-1, EGLN3 and TAG); and (4) protein sorting (MARCH11 and FBXL7). It is interesting that many of these genes are known to play a role in cancer biology. The link between MetS and increased cancer risk is well known [38] thus our prioritized genes provide a possible explanation for the observed association between MetS and cancer.

Our strongest SNPs associations on the chr5 QTL clustered around genes in the cell-cell adhesion pathways (Table 2 and Figure 1). Cell to cell adhesion is a key event in major cellular processes including proliferation, mobility, differentiation and cell death. It is also a basic mechanism facilitating the paracrine communication between cells. CDH18 is a cadherin that is expressed in multiple tissues, most prominently in the CNS [39] and is one of several cadherin genes located in this region of chromosome 5. The CDH18 gene was most strongly associated with weight, BMI, waist circumference and RQ in our cohort, indicating a possible role in the development of body composition. Mechanistically this could be mediated via a role in CNS but since cell adhesion is a phenomenon that is integral to the regional expansion of adipose tissue it is possible that the gene may play a direct role in the preferential deposition of fat into the visceral abdominal region, a fundamental phenotype of MetS. Aberrations leading to alteration of cell adhesion are linked with several tumor types. N-cadherins specifically have been reported to play a role in the formation, growth, invasion [40] and migration of malignant tumors in various settings, including Crohn’s disease [41] and prostate cancer [42, 43]. Deletions in the region of the chromosome 5 cadherin cluster have been specifically associated with risk of some malignancies [44]. Thus it is possible that the CDH18 gene and other nearby genes identified in cohort (including CTNND2, CDH12 and MYO10) play a mechanistic role in the observed connection between MetS and cancer risk.

Our strongest SNP association signals for plasma adiponectin levels clustered near the gene MYO10 on chr5. MYO10 protein is a member of the myosin family and has a role in trafficking adhesion molecules including integrins and adherins [45]. It is essential for the initiation, stability and formation of filopodia, a “finger-like” cellular protrusion that can sense environmental cues and a key structure for cell motility including cancer cells [46]. In a recent study of breast cancer with poor prognosis, expression of MYO10 is significantly increased in patients with breast cancer. The expression of MYO10 also differentially clustered with clinocopathological markers including p53 mutation, estrogen receptor (ER), tumor grade and patient survival [46]. In our analysis, variants in MYO10 also associated with lean body mass, LDL diameter and IL-6, thus reflecting pleiotropy in its role in MetS, possibly via modulation of adiponectin levels. No data has shown that MYO10 directly transports CDH18, however our data suggest that these two genes might work together in a biological pathway that predisposes individuals with MetS for carcinogenesis or high risk of metastasis. Our evaluation of the function of these tagging SNPs (or SNPs in LD with these) suggested strong cis-effects of variants near the TSS of MYO10. This region thus may harbor causal SNP(s) that directly affect binding of transcription factors. Results from human cell lines recently published by the ENCODE project has demonstrated that this 17 kb region is marked with transcription-activating histone modifications, is highly accessible to protein binding, and can be bound by multiple transcription factors in chromatin immunoprecipitation assays (Figure 3) [33, 34]. Our approach therefore is able to efficiently identify genetic elements that can function in influencing genes important for our traits of interest.

At the QTL on chr14, SNP associations clustered near genes that function as signal transducers like AKAP6 and transcription factors like NPAS3 (Table 3 and Figure 2). The protein encoded by AKAP6 is an anchor protein for the well-characterized protein kinase A (PKA), also known as AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). AKAPs compartmentalize AMPK, thereby regulating AMPK’s biological functions. AKAPs by themselves may also function as integrators of AMPK-related signal transduction pathways [47]. AMPK is a key regulator sensing cellular energy status and systemic energy balance [48] and mediates the effects of adipose tissue kinins including adiponectin and leptin in regulating body weight, glucose and lipid homeostasis [48]. It may also play a role in cancer via several processes including arresting of cell cycle progression, triggering inhibition of protein synthesis, and cell growth required in cell proliferation [49]. AMPK is also known to overcome growth factor signaling from a variety of stimuli mediated by the proto-oncogenes Akt and ERK. The AMPK signaling network also contains a number of tumor suppressor genes including p53, which is a universal tumor suppressor [50]. AMPK is thus one of the most prominent biological molecules proposed to connect metabolic pathways of MetS to cancer [50].

NPAS3, associated with several lipid and cytokine phenotypes in our cohort, encodes a neuronal basic helix-loop-helix (Per, Arnt, Sim) domain transcription factor, belonging to a family that has been reported to be crucial for neuronal development and maintenance [51] and exerts a regulatory role in neurogenesis and brain glucose metabolism [52]. Brain tissue of an NPAS3 knockout mouse model shows altered levels of the glycolysis metabolites, the pentose phosphate shunt and Krebs cycle components, and aberrant behavior in mice. Glucose sensing by the brain is known to have effects on feeding, behavior, weight, weight control and associated metabolic consequences, as in MetS. NPAS3 can also modulate cell cycle proliferation, apoptosis, migration and cell invasion and exhibits features of a tumor suppressor. Absence of NPAS3 expression in astrocytomas is a negative prognostic marker for survival [53].

Increasing evidence has suggested that peripheral blood can be used to reveal the relative differences in gene expression among individuals [54, 55]. Obtaining gene expression information using peripheral blood is simple and minimally invasive, making it possible to assay a large number of our subjects. Furthermore, obesity can be considered as a low-grade inflammation state [56], due to long-term low-level immune response triggered by accumulation of macrophages in visceral adipose tissue, chronic insulin resistance, adiponkine and cytokine production and malfunctional cardiovascular performance [57, 58]. Profiling gene expression in peripheral blood therefore may capture changes in the expression of genes important for components of MetS such as visceral adiposity. In our analysis, we found some significant signals of SNP associations near pro-inflammatory genes. MARCH11 (associated with fat, FI, SI and IL-1beta in our cohort) and FBXL7 (associated with WHR in our cohort) belong to the family of ubiquitin ligases that are engaged in the process of protein sorting and transport of deformed ones from the trans-Golgi network [59, 60]. MARCH11 expression was shown in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database to be higher in patients with inflammatory dilated cardiomyopathy. FBXL7, an F-box protein family member, is specific for sorting of phosphorylated proteins and their degradation. Thus MARCH11 and FBXL7 may be involved in inflammation, a characteristic phenotype of MetS.

We do acknowledge that PWBC can reveal only a portion of the total gene expression information and that profiling it in other focal tissues like adipose and liver might reveal complementary genomic information. Further exploration of the expression levels of the other genes associated with MetS (and known to play a role in cancer biology) in other target tissues might help to reveal their gene expression correlations with MetS traits.

Our study has identified several novel as well as previously reported genes whose SNP variants are associated with phenotypes that are important components of MetS. e.g. genome-wide study of the genetic basis of insulin resistance reported that a variant of AKAP6 was associated with BMI-adjusted fasting insulin (5×10-7) in a meta-analysis cohort of European descent [61]. NPAS3 was found in the current study to be associated with a multitude of phenotypes including two inflammatory markers IL-1β and IL-6. Interestingly, in a recent report of a genome-wide search for associations between SNPs and biomarkers of systemic inflammation before and after an anti-inflammatory drug treatment, a variant of NPAS3 was found to be one of the two most significantly associated gene loci with levels of C-reactive protein [62], and studies of visceral adiposity and BMI identified FBXL7, MARCH6 and PRKD1 as candidate loci [63–65].

Conclusions

In the present study of a family cohort of Northern European origin, we conducted a comprehensive analysis using both SNP associations and gene expression correlations on two previously identified adiponectin QTLs and identified 14 novel genes associated with various metabolic syndrome traits. We found that many of these genes are involved in fundamental cellular functions that could provide a mechanistic link between the development of metabolic syndrome and cancer biology as well as systemic inflammation. Further studies are needed to elucidate the roles these genes play in the development of metabolic syndrome and its relationship with cancer biology. Eventually this could lead to the design of novel diagnostic markers and/or pharmaceutical agents for the prevention and treatment of MetS patients who are at higher risks for developing cancer and systemic inflammation.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Dr. Ahmed Kissebah, the senior author of this work, was fully involved in the preparation of this report up to his death on 17 May 2012. We are saddened by his loss and deeply respectful of his long and distinguished career in obesity research.

We acknowledge the contribution of Roland James (Medical College of Wisconsin), the project manager of TOPS Center for Obesity and Metabolic Research, for his extensive effort in recruitment, phenotyping and database management; Jacqueline Marks (Medical College of Wisconsin) for her supervision of all biochemical procedures; Melena Zelembaba and Regina Cole (Medical College of Wisconsin) for their technical assistance in the Affymetrix chips genotyping procedures; and Ruth Gielow (TOPS Club, Inc.) and her assistants in the recruitment process. Finally, we are most grateful to all the members of TOPS Club, Inc. and their families who volunteered for this study. This work is supported by grants from the NIH (DK071895-03 and DK65598-01) to A.H.K and by TOPS (Take Off Pounds Sensibly) Club, Inc.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
TOPS Obesity and Metabolic Research Center, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
(2)
Human and Molecular Genetics Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
(3)
Department of Genetics, Texas Biomedical Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas, USA
(4)
Department of Physiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
(5)
Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA

References

  1. Day C: Metabolic syndrome, or What you will: definitions and epidemiology. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2007, 4 (1): 32-38. 10.3132/dvdr.2007.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Russo A, Autelitano M, Bisanti L: Metabolic syndrome and cancer risk. Eur J Cancer. 2008, 44 (2): 293-297. 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.11.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Talvensaari KK, Lanning M, Tapanainen P, Knip M: Long-term survivors of childhood cancer have an increased risk of manifesting the metabolic syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996, 81 (8): 3051-3055. 10.1210/jc.81.8.3051.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chandran M, Phillips SA, Ciaraldi T, Henry RR: Adiponectin: more than just another fat cell hormone. Diab Care. 2003, 26: 2442-2450. 10.2337/diacare.26.8.2442.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Pajvani UB, Hawkins M, Combs TP, Rajala MW, Doebber T, Berger JP, Wagner JA, Wu M, Knopps A, Xiang AH, Utzschneider KM, Kahn SE, Olefsky JM, Buchanan TA, Scherer PE: Complex distribution, not absolute amount of adiponectin, correlates with thiazolidinedione-mediated improvement in insulin sensitivity. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 12152-12162.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ouchi N, Walsh K: Adiponectin as an anti-inflammatory factor. Clin Chim Acta. 2007, 380 (1–2): 24-30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Kubota N, Terauchi Y, Yamauchi T, Kubota T, Moroi M, Matsui J, Eto K, Yamashita T, Kamon J, Satoh H, Yano W, Froguel P, Nagai R, Kimura S, Kadowaki T, Noda T: Disruption of adiponectin causes insulin resistance and neointimal formation. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277 (29): 25863-25866. 10.1074/jbc.C200251200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Magge SN, Stettler N, Koren D, Levitt Katz LE, Gallagher PR, Mohler ER, Rader DJ: Adiponectin is associated with favorable lipoprotein profile, independent of BMI and insulin resistance, in adolescents. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011, 96 (5): 1549-1554. 10.1210/jc.2010-2364.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Kelesidis I, Kelesidis T, Mantzoros CS: Adiponectin and cancer: a systematic review. Br J Cancer. 2006, 94 (9): 1221-1225. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603051.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Comuzzie AG, Funahashi T, Sonnenberg G, Martin LJ, Jacob HJ, Black AE, Maas D, Takahashi M, Kihara S, Tanaka S, Matsuzawa Y, Blangero J, Cohen D, Kissebah A: The genetic basis of plasma variation in adiponectin, a global endophenotype for obesity and the metabolic syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001, 86 (9): 4321-4325. 10.1210/jc.86.9.4321.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kissebah AH, Sonnenberg GE, Myklebust J, Goldstein M, Broman K, James RG, Marks JA, Krakower GR, Jacob HJ, Weber J, Martin L, Blangero J, Comuzzie AG: Quantitative trait loci on chromosomes 3 and 17 influence phenotypes of the metabolic syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000, 97 (26): 14478-14483. 10.1073/pnas.97.26.14478.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Sonnenberg GE, Krakower GR, Martin LJ, Olivier M, Kwitek AE, Comuzzie AG, Blangero J, Kissebah AH: Genetic determinants of obesity-related lipid traits. J Lipid Res. 2004, 45 (4): 610-615. 10.1194/jlr.M300474-JLR200.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Svendsen OL, Haarbo J, Heitmann BL, Gotfredsen A, Christiansen C: Measurement of body fat in elderly subjects by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, bioelectrical impedance, and anthropometry. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991, 53 (5): 1117-1123.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Peiris AN, Hennes MI, Evans DJ, Wilson CR, Lee MB, Kissebah AH: Relationship of anthropometric measurements of body fat distribution to metabolic profile in premenopausal women. Acta Med Scand Suppl. 1988, 723: 179-188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bergman RN: Toward physiological understanding of glucose tolerance. Minimal-model approach. Diabetes. 1989, 38: 1512-1527. 10.2337/diabetes.38.12.1512.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Rainwater DL, Moore PH, Shelledy WR, Dyer TD, Slifer SH: Characterization of a composite gradient gel for the electrophoretic separation of lipoproteins. J Lipid Res. 1997, 38 (6): 1261-1266.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Dupont NC, Wang K, Wadhwa PD, Culhane JF, Nelson EL: Validation and comparison of luminex multiplex cytokine analysis kits with ELISA: determinations of a panel of nine cytokines in clinical sample culture supernatants. J Reprod Immunol. 2005, 66 (2): 175-191. 10.1016/j.jri.2005.03.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Almasy L, Blangero J: Multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in general pedigrees. Am J Hum Genet. 1998, 62 (5): 1198-1211. 10.1086/301844.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Burdick JT, Chen W-M, Abecasis GR, Cheung VG: In silico method for inferring missing genotypes in pedigrees. Nat Genet. 2006, 38: 1002-1004. 10.1038/ng1863.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Göring HH, Curran JE, Johnson MP, Dyer TD, Charlesworth J, Cole SA, Jowett JBM, Abraham LJ, Rainwater DL, Comuzzie AG, Mahaney MC, Almasy L, MacCluer JW, Kissebah AH, Collier GR, Moses EK, Blangero J: Discovery of expression QTLs using large-scale transcriptional profiling in human lymphocytes. Nat Genet. 2007, 39 (10): 1208-1216. 10.1038/ng2119.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Edgar R, Domrachev M, Lash AE: Gene expression omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30 (1): 207-210. 10.1093/nar/30.1.207.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Boerwinkle E, Chakraborty R, Sing CF: The use of measured genotype information in the analysis of quantitative phenotypes in man. I. Models and analytical methods. Ann Hum Genet. 1986, 50: 181-194. 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1986.tb01037.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, Weinblatt ME, Shadick NA, Reich D: Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2006, 38: 904-909. 10.1038/ng1847.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Moskvina V, Schmidt KM: On multiple testing correction in genome-wide association studies. Genet Epidemiol. 2008, 32: 567-573. 10.1002/gepi.20331.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Whitlock MC: Combining probability from independent tests: the weighted Z-method is superior to Fisher’s approach. J Evol Biol. 2005, 18: 1368-1373. 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00917.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhang Y, Kent JW, Olivier M, Ali O, Broeckel U, Abdou RM, Dyer TD, Comuzzie AE, Curran JE, Carless MA, Rainwater DL, Goring HHH, Blangero J, Kissebah AH: QTL-based association analyses reveal novel genes influencing pleiotropy of Metabolic Syndrome (MetS). Obesity. 2013, acceptedGoogle Scholar
  27. May Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP): Expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III). JAMA. 2001, 285 (19): 2486-2497. 10.1001/jama.285.19.2486.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ, Cleeman JI, Donato KA, Fruchart JC, James WP, Loria CM, Smith SC, International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; Hational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; International Association for the Study of Obesity: Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the international diabetes federation task force on epidemiology and prevention; national heart, lung, and blood institute; American heart association; world heart federation; international atherosclerosis society; and international association for the study of obesity. Circulation. 2009, 120 (16): 1640-1645. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192644.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ho C, Zhou J, Medina M, Goto T, Jacobson M, Bhide PG, Kosik KS: Delta-catenin is a nervous system-specific adherens junction protein which undergoes dynamic relocalization during development. J Comp Neurol. 2000, 420 (2): 261-276. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(20000501)420:2<261::AID-CNE8>3.0.CO;2-Q.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhou J, Liyanage U, Medina M, Ho C, Simmons AD, Lovett M, Kosik KS: Presenilin 1 interaction in the brain with a novel member of the Armadillo family. Neuroreport. 1997, 8 (8): 2085-2090. 10.1097/00001756-199705260-00054.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kent WJ, Sugnet CW, Furey TS, Roskin KM, Pringle TH, Zahler AM, Haussler D: The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 2002, 12 (6): 996-1006.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. UCSC Genome Database. http://genome.ucsc.edu/.
  33. Myers RM, Stamatoyannopoulos J, Snyder M, Dunham I, Hardison RC, Bernstein BE, Gingeras TR, Kent WJ, Birney E, ENCODE Project Consortium: A user’s guide to the encyclopedia of DNA elements (ENCODE). PLoS Biol. 2011, 9 (4): e1001046-10.1371/journal.pbio.1001046.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Rosenbloom KR, Dreszer TR, Long JC, Malladi VS, Sloan CA, Raney BJ, Cline MS, Karolchik D, Barber GP, Clawson H, Diekhans M, Fujita PA, Goldman M, Gravell RC, Harte RA, Hinrichs AS, Kirkup VM, Kuhn RM, Learned K, Maddren M, Meyer LR, Pohl A, Rhead B, Wong MC, Zweig AS, Haussler D, Kent WJ: ENCODE whole-genome data in the UCSC genome browser: update 2012. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 40 (Database issue): 1-6.Google Scholar
  35. Pruim RJ, Welch RP, Sanna S, Teslovich TM, Chines PS, Gliedt TP, Boehnke M, Abecasis GR, Willer CJ: LocusZoom: Regional visualization of genome-wide association scan results. Bioinformatics. 2010, 26 (18): 2336-2337. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq419.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Koh SB, Yoon J, Kim JY, Yoo BS, Lee SH, Park JK, Choe KH: Relationships between serum adiponectin with metabolic syndrome and components of metabolic syndrome in non-diabetic Koreans: ARIRANG study. Yonsei Med J. 2011, 52 (2): 234-241. 10.3349/ymj.2011.52.2.234.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Patel DA, Srinivasan SR, Xu JH, Chen W, Berenson GS: Adiponectin and its correlates of cardiovascular risk in young adults: the Bogalusa heart study. Metabolism. 2006, 55 (11): 1551-1557. 10.1016/j.metabol.2006.06.028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Esposito K, Chiodini P, Colao A, Lenzi A, Giugliano D: Metabolic syndrome and risk of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2012, 35 (11): 2402-2411. 10.2337/dc12-0336.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Gene Expression Atlas at the European Bioinformatics Institute. http://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/gene/ENSG00000145526?ef=cell_type.
  40. Hazan RB, Phillips GR, Qiao RF, Norton L, Aaronson SA: Exogenous expression of N-cadherin in breast cancer cells induces cell migration, invasion, and metastasis. J Cell Biol. 2000, 148 (4): 779-790. 10.1083/jcb.148.4.779.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Burke JP, Cunningham MF, Sweeney C, Docherty NG, O’Connell PR: N-cadherin is overexpressed in Crohn‘s stricture fibroblasts and promotes intestinal fibroblast migration. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011, 17 (8): 1665-1673. 10.1002/ibd.21543.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Gravdal K, Halvorsen OJ, Haukaas SA, Akslen LA: A switch from E-cadherin to N-cadherin expression indicates epithelial to mesenchymal transition and is of strong and independent importance for the progress of prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2007, 13 (23): 7003-7011. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1263.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Tanaka H, Kono E, Tran CP, Miyazaki H, Yamashiro J, Shimomura T, Fazli L, Wada R, Huang J, Vessella RL, An J, Horvath S, Gleave M, Rettig MB, Wainberg ZA, Reiter RE: Monoclonal antibody targeting of N-cadherin inhibits prostate cancer growth, metastasis and castration resistance. Nat Med. 2010, 16 (12): 1414-1420. 10.1038/nm.2236.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Kajikawa Y, Ikeda M, Takemoto S, Tomoda J, Ohmaru N, Kusachi S: Association of circulating levels of leptin and adiponectin with metabolic syndrome and coronary heart disease in patients with various coronary risk factors. Int Heart J. 2011, 52 (1): 17-22. 10.1536/ihj.52.17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Almagro S, Durmort C, Chervin-Pétinot A, Heyraud S, Dubois M, Lambert O, Maillefaud C, Hewat E, Schaal JP, Huber P, Gulino-Debrac D: The motor protein myosin-X transports VE-cadherin along filopodia to allow the formation of early endothelial cell-cell contacts. Mol Cell Biol. 2010, 30 (7): 1703-1717. 10.1128/MCB.01226-09.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Arjonen A, Kaukonen R, Ivaska J: Filopodia and adhesion in cancer cell motility. Cell Adh Migr. 2011, 5 (5): 421-430. 10.4161/cam.5.5.17723.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Michel JJ, Scott JD: AKAP mediated signal transduction. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2002, 42: 235-257. 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.42.083101.135801.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Kahn BB, Alquier T, Carling D, Hardie DG: AMP-activated protein kinase: ancient energy gauge provides clues to modern understanding of metabolism. Cell Metab. 2005, 1 (1): 15-25. 10.1016/j.cmet.2004.12.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Carretero J, Medina PP, Blanco R, Smit L, Tang M, Roncador G, Maestre L, Conde E, Lopez-Rios F, Clevers HC, Sanchez-Cespedes M: Dysfunctional AMPK activity, signalling through mTOR and survival in response to energetic stress in LKB1-deficient lung cancer. Oncogene. 2007, 26 (11): 1616-1625. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209951.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Motoshima H, Goldstein BJ, Igata M, Araki E: AMPK and cell proliferation–AMPK as a therapeutic target for atherosclerosis and cancer. J Physiol. 2006, 574: 63-71. 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.108324.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Rutter J, Reick M, Wu LC, McKnight SL: Regulation of clock and NPAS2 DNA binding by the redox state of NAD cofactors. Science. 2001, 293 (5529): 510-514. 10.1126/science.1060698.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Sha L, Macintyre L, Machell JA, Kelly MP, Porteous DJ, Brandon NJ, Muir WJ, Blackwood DH, Watson DG, Clapcote SJ, Pickard BS: Transcriptional regulation of neurodevelopmental and metabolic pathways by NPAS3. Mol Psychiatry. 2012, 17: 267-279. 10.1038/mp.2011.73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Moreira F, Kiehl TR, So K, Ajeawung NF, Honculada C, Gould P, Pieper RO, Kamnasaran D: NPAS3 demonstrates features of a tumor suppressive role in driving the progression of Astrocytomas. Am J Pathol. 2011, 179 (1): 462-476. 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.03.044.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Charlesworth JC, Curran JE, Johnson MP, Göring HHH, Dyer TD, Diego VP, Kent JW, Mahaney MC, Almasy L, MacCluer JW, Moses EK, Blangero J: Transcriptomic epidemiology of smoking: the effect of smoking on gene expression in lymphocytes. BMC Medical Genomics. 2010, 3: 29-10.1186/1755-8794-3-29.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Yamaoka M, Maeda N, Nakamura S, Kashine S, Nakagawa Y, Hiuge-Shimizu A, Okita K, Imagawa A, Matsuzawa Y, Matsubara K, Funahashi T, Shimomura I: A pilot investigation of visceral fat adiposity and gene expression profile in peripheral blood cells. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (10): e47377-10.1371/journal.pone.0047377.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Scarpellini E, Tack J: Obesity and metabolic syndrome: an inflammatory condition. Dig Dis. 2012, 30 (2): 148-153. 10.1159/000336664.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Hotamisligil GS: Endoplasmic reticulum stress and the inflammatory basis of metabolic disease. Cell. 2010, 140: 900-917. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.034.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Neels JG, Olefsky JM: Inflamed fat: what starts the fire?. J Clin Invest. 2006, 116: 33-35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Morokuma Y, Nakamura N, Kato A, Notoya M, Yamamoto Y, Sakai Y, Fukuda H, Yamashina S, Hirata Y, Hirose S: MARCH-XI, a novel transmembrane ubiquitin ligase implicated in ubiquitin-dependent protein sorting in developing spermatids. J Biol Chem. 2007, 282 (34): 24806-24815. 10.1074/jbc.M700414200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Cenciarelli C, Chiaur DS, Guardavaccaro D, Parks W, Vidal M, Pagano M: Identification of a family of human F-box proteins. Curr Biol. 1999, 9 (20): 1177-1179. 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)80020-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Manning AK, Hivert MF, Scott RA, Grimsby JL, Bouatia-Naji N, Chen H, Rybin D, Liu CT, Bielak LF, Prokopenko I, Amin N, Barnes D, Cadby G, Hottenga JJ, Ingelsson E, Jackson AU, Johnson T, Kanoni S, Ladenvall C, Lagou V, Lahti J, Lecoeur C, Liu Y, Martinez-Larrad MT, Montasser ME, Navarro P, Perry JR, Rasmussen-Torvik LJ, Salo P, Sattar N: A genome-wide approach accounting for body mass index identifies genetic variants influencing fasting glycemic traits and insulin resistance. Nat Genet. 2012, 44 (6): 659-669. 10.1038/ng.2274.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Aslibekyan S, Kabagambe EK, Irvin MR, Straka RJ, Borecki IB, Tiwari HK, Tsai MY, Hopkins PN, Shen J, Lai CQ, Ordovas JM, Arnett DK: A genome-wide association study of inflammatory biomarker changes in response to fenofibrate treatment in the genetics of lipid lowering drug and diet network. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2012, 22 (3): 191-197. 10.1097/FPC.0b013e32834fdd41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Fox CS, Liu Y, White CC, Feitosa M, Smith AV, Heard-Costa N, Lohman K, Johnson AD, Foster MC, Greenawalt DM, Griffin P, Ding J, Newman AB, Tylavsky F, Miljkovic I, Kritchevsky SB, Launer L, Garcia M, Eiriksdottir G, Carr JJ, Gudnason V, Harris TB, Cupples LA, Borecki IB, GIANT Consortium; MAGIC Consortium; GLGC Consortium: Genome-wide association for abdominal subcutaneous and visceral adipose reveals a novel locus for visceral fat in women. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8 (5): e1002695-10.1371/journal.pgen.1002695.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Wang KS, Liu X, Zheng S, Zeng M, Pan Y, Callahan K: A novel locus for body mass index on 5p15.2: a meta-analysis of two genome-wide association studies. Gene. 2012, 500 (1): 80-84. 10.1016/j.gene.2012.03.046.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Speliotes EK, Willer CJ, Berndt SI, Monda KL, Thorleifsson G, Jackson AU, Lango Allen H, Lindgren CM, Luan J, Mägi R, Randall JC, Vedantam S, Winkler TW, Qi L, Workalemahu T, Heid IM, Steinthorsdottir V, Stringham HM, Weedon MN, Wheeler E, Wood AR, Ferreira T, Weyant RJ, Segrè AV, Estrada K, Liang L, Nemesh J, Park JH, Gustafsson S, Kilpeläinen TO: Association analyses of 249,796 individuals reveal 18 new loci associated with body mass index. Nat Genet. 2010, 42 (11): 937-948. 10.1038/ng.686.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

    66. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1755-8794/6/14/prepub

Copyright

© Zhang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

BMC Medical Genomics

ISSN: 1755-8794

Contact us